Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (28)
- Supreme Court of the United States (6)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (4)
- Business Organizations Law (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
-
- Law and Society (3)
- Securities Law (3)
- Common Law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- International Law (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Sexuality and the Law (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Economic Policy (1)
- Election Law (1)
- European Law (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (10)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- BLR (4)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (4)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (3)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- George Washington University Law School (2)
- SelectedWorks (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (6)
- William & Mary Law Review (5)
- ExpressO (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Scholarly Works (3)
-
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (3)
- Articles (2)
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Brannon P. Denning (1)
- College of Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Duke Law Journal (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- John F. Stinneford (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Publications (1)
- Ronald F. Wright (1)
- SJD Dissertation Abstracts (1)
- Saint Louis University Law Journal (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- Supreme Court Preview (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 53 of 53
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Wisdom We Have Lost: Sentencing Information And Its Uses, Marc L. Miller, Ronald F. Wright
The Wisdom We Have Lost: Sentencing Information And Its Uses, Marc L. Miller, Ronald F. Wright
Ronald F. Wright
Both federal and state experience in sentencing over the last three decades suggest that sentencing data and knowledge most often lead to wisdom when they are collected with particular uses and users in mind. Ironically, greater reliance on data and expertise can democratize the making and testing of sentencing policy. When data are collected and published with many different users in mind, a variety of participants in the sentencing process can join the Commission as creators of sentencing wisdom, including Congress, state legislatures, state sentencing commissions, sentencing judges, and scholars.
Under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, Congress envisioned federal …
What Hath Raich Wrought? Five Takes, Brannon P. Denning, Glenn H. Reynolds
What Hath Raich Wrought? Five Takes, Brannon P. Denning, Glenn H. Reynolds
Brannon P. Denning
Written for a paper symposium on Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), we describe the effects of the decision on what had seemed a renewed interest on the part of the Court to limit federal power.
Sarbanes-Oxley, Corporate Federalism, And The Declining Significance Of Federal Reforms On State Director Independence Standards, Lisa M. Fairfax
Sarbanes-Oxley, Corporate Federalism, And The Declining Significance Of Federal Reforms On State Director Independence Standards, Lisa M. Fairfax
Faculty Scholarship
Commentators have argued that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley” or the “Act”) raises federalism concerns because it regulates the internal affairs of a corporation, including the composition of, and qualifications for, corporate boards, in a manner traditionally reserved to states. This Article responds to those claims, arguing that the Act reflects a relatively minimal intrusion into state law, particularly with regard to issues of director independence. This Article further argues that the Act’s failure to disturb state law on these issues may impede its ability to tighten director independence standards and by extension may undermine its ability to improve …
Political Bargaining And Judicial Intervention In Constitutional And Antitrust Federalism, Jim Rossi
Political Bargaining And Judicial Intervention In Constitutional And Antitrust Federalism, Jim Rossi
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Federal judicial deference to state and local regulation is at the center of contentious debates regarding the implementation of competition policy. This Article invokes a political process bargaining framework to develop a principled approach for addressing the appropriate level of judicial intervention under the dormant commerce clause and state action immunity from antitrust enforcement. Using illustrations from network industries, it is argued that, at core, these two independent doctrines share a common concern with political (not only market) failure by focusing on the incentives faced by powerful stakeholders in state and local lawmaking. More important, they share the common purpose …
Preparing The Groundwork For A Responsible Debate On Stem Cell Research And Human Cloning, O. Carter Snead
Preparing The Groundwork For A Responsible Debate On Stem Cell Research And Human Cloning, O. Carter Snead
Journal Articles
The debate over both cloning and stem cell research has been intense and polarizing. It played a significant role in the recently completed presidential campaign, mentioned by both candidates on the stump, at both parties' conventions, and was even taken up directly during one of the presidential debates. The topic has been discussed and debated almost continuously by the members of the legal, scientific, medical, and public policy commentariat. I believe that it is a heartening tribute to our national polity that such a complex moral, ethical, and scientific issue has become a central focus of our political discourse. But, …
The Use Of Hiring Preferences By Alaska Native Corporations After Malabed V. North Slope Borough, James P. Mills
The Use Of Hiring Preferences By Alaska Native Corporations After Malabed V. North Slope Borough, James P. Mills
Seattle University Law Review
This article argues that Native corporations can provide employment preferences for Alaska Natives, so long as they are appropriately tailored to provide employment preferences to that corporation's shareholders or those closely related to the shareholders. Moreover, a hiring preference based on shareholder status is not a preference based on race and, as such, does not violate Alaska state law.24 But even if the Alaska Supreme Court found that these hiring preferences did violate the state constitution, given the federal government's unique relationship with Native corporations 25 and Congress's clear intent for Native corporations to favor Alaska Natives in their hiring …
Discussion: Focus On Federalism, Erwin Chemerinsky, Jeffrey B. Morris, Martin A. Schwartz
Discussion: Focus On Federalism, Erwin Chemerinsky, Jeffrey B. Morris, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dual Constitutions And Constitutional Duels: Separation Of Powers And State Implementation Of Federally Inspired Regulatory Programs And Standards, Jim Rossi
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Frequently, state-wide executive agencies and localities attempt to implement federally-inspired programs. Two predominant examples are cooperative federalism programs and incorporation of federal standards in state-specific law. Federally-inspired programs can bump into state constitutional restrictions on the allocation of powers, especially in states whose constitutional systems embrace stronger prohibitions on legislative delegation than the weak restrictions at the federal level, where national goals and standards are made. This Article addresses this tension between dual federal/state normative accounts of the constitutional allocation of powers in state implementation of federally-inspired programs. To the extent the predominant ways of resolving the tension come from …
Moving Public Law Out Of The Deference Trap In Regulated Industries, Jim Rossi
Moving Public Law Out Of The Deference Trap In Regulated Industries, Jim Rossi
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This Article argues that public law has fallen into what I call a deference trap in addressing conflicts in deregulated industries, such as telecommunications and electric power. The deference trap describes a judicial reluctance to intervene in disputes involving political institutions, such as regulatory agencies and states. By reassessing the deference trap across the legal doctrines that are effecting emerging telecommunications and electric power markets, public law can deliver much more for deregulated markets. The deference trap poses a particular cost as markets are deregulated, one that may not have been present during previous regulatory eras in which public and …
Federalism And The Allocation Of Sovereignty Beyond The State In The European Union, Ronald A. Brand
Federalism And The Allocation Of Sovereignty Beyond The State In The European Union, Ronald A. Brand
Articles
Any discussion of federalism necessarily runs headlong into concepts of sovereignty, with both terms being subject to Tocqueville's statement that, in discussing federalism, "the human understanding more easily invents new things than new words." Thus, just as systems previously considered to have been "federal" at the dawn of the United States of America were something much different from what was developed for our nation at that time, so is the "federal" system of today's United States different from anything to which we make comparisons.
This article reviews a paper by Professor Peter Tettinger's, and extends his analysis. As Professor Tettinger …
The Supreme Court, Rule 10b-5, And The Federalization Of Corporate Law, Mark J. Loewenstein
The Supreme Court, Rule 10b-5, And The Federalization Of Corporate Law, Mark J. Loewenstein
Publications
This Article examines Supreme Court jurisprudence since 1997 under the federal securities laws in light of the Court's earlier securities law decisions and in light of its recent decisions construing the Constitution and federal statutes as they relate to the regulation of business. These post-1977 cases strongly suggest that the much-heralded new federalism philosophy of the Supreme Court is not a factor in securities law cases or in business cases generally. Indeed, the opposite seems to be the case. In this context, new federalism cases appear to be an anomaly, with the reality being that the Court is still as …
Is Morrison Dead? Assessing A Supreme Drug (Law) Overdose, Jonathan H. Adler
Is Morrison Dead? Assessing A Supreme Drug (Law) Overdose, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
There was little doubt that the federal government would prevail in Gonzales v. Raich. What was, perhaps, unexpected was so expansive a repudiation of enforceable judicial limitations on federal power. In upholding the constitutionality of the Controlled Substances Act as applied to the non-commercial intrastate possession and consumption of marijuana for medical purposes as authorized under California law, the Supreme Court hollowed out the core of contemporary commerce clause jurisprudence. Insofar as United States v. Morrison had stood for the propositions that only intrastate economic activities could be aggregated for purposes of the "substantial effects" test, that attenuated connections between …
Judicial Federalism And The Future Of Federal Environmental Regulation, Jonathan H. Adler
Judicial Federalism And The Future Of Federal Environmental Regulation, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
This article assesses the current and likely impact of the Supreme Court's federalism cases on federal environmental regulation. As a result of this assessment, the article seeks to make four points: (1) Thus far, the Supreme Court's federalism cases have had a limited impact on federal regulation, as federal courts have not used these cases as a basis for limiting the reach of federal regulatory authority. (2) Notwithstanding this limited impact, the underlying logic of the Supreme Court's cases does pose a challenge for federal regulation, particularly in the Commerce Clause context. (3) The thrust of the federalism cases makes …
Jurisdictional Mismatch In Environmental Federalism, Jonathan H. Adler
Jurisdictional Mismatch In Environmental Federalism, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
Jurisdictional mismatch plagues contemporary environmental law and policy. The division of authority and responsibility for environmental protection between the federal and state governments lacks any cohesive rationale or justification. The federal government regulates in many areas where there is no clear analytical basis for federal involvement. At the same time, the federal government is relatively absent where a stronger federal presence could be justified. Conversely, states are precluded, discouraged or otherwise inhibited from adopting environmental protections where state efforts would be worthwhile. At the same time, state intervention seeps into areas where a dominant federal role would be more defensible. …
Looking Ahead To The 2005-06 Term (2005), Jonathan H. Adler
Looking Ahead To The 2005-06 Term (2005), Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
This essay surveys the upcoming 2005-06 term of the Supreme Court, a term that may be as notable for what it says about the future direction of the Supreme Court as it is for specific decisions in any particular cases. This does not mean the term lacks important cases. To the contrary, this coming year the Court will consider the constitutionality of the Solomon Amendment, address the application of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to religious use of drugs, and determine whether the federal government can effectively preempt Oregon's decision to legalize doctor-assisted suicide. It will revisit contemporary federalism and …
Federalism In Brazil, Keith S. Rosenn
The Federal Marriage Amendment: To Protect The Sanctity Of Marriage Or Destroy Constitutional Democracy?, Joan Schaffner
The Federal Marriage Amendment: To Protect The Sanctity Of Marriage Or Destroy Constitutional Democracy?, Joan Schaffner
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
For the several years, primarily as a political ploy, the President and Republican Congress, proposed an amendment to the US Constitution to prohibit marriage between people of the same sex - the Federal Marriage Amendment. This article analyzed this proposed amendment in light of the constitutional principles that govern our society, individual rights, federalism, separation of powers, and judicial review. The article concludes that the FMA is itself constitutionally suspect and is more destructive, on balance, of the basic democratic constitutional principles than any amendment previously adopted or proposed. The amendment violates every tenet of constitutional democracy by: (1) expressly …
Sarbanes-Oxley, Corporate Federalism, And The Declining Significance Of Federal Reforms On State Director Independence Standards, Lisa M. Fairfax
Sarbanes-Oxley, Corporate Federalism, And The Declining Significance Of Federal Reforms On State Director Independence Standards, Lisa M. Fairfax
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
Commentators have argued that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley" or the "Act") raises federalism concerns because it regulates the internal affairs of a corporation, including the composition of, and qualifications for, corporate boards, in a manner traditionally reserved to states. This Article responds to those claims, arguing that the Act reflects a relatively minimal intrusion into state law, particularly with regard to issues of director independence. This Article further argues that the Act's failure to disturb state law on these issues may impede its ability to tighten director independence standards and by extension may undermine its ability to improve …
What Hath Raich Wrought? Five Takes, Glenn Harlan Reynolds
What Hath Raich Wrought? Five Takes, Glenn Harlan Reynolds
Scholarly Works
The Court's decision in Gonzales v. Raich provides an opportunity to reflect on the Rehnquist Court's apparent run at establishing a judicially-enforceable federalism. Two of the most visible symbols of this effort were the decisions in United States v. Lopez and United States v. Morrison, in which the Court twice struck down acts of Congress as beyond the scope of its commerce power. Now, nearly ten years after Lopez and five years after Morrison, Raich leaves many wondering whether the Court provided an answer to John Nagle's question whether Lopez was destined to be a watershed or a "but see …
What Hath Raich Wrought? Five Takes, Brannon Denning, Glenn Reynolds
What Hath Raich Wrought? Five Takes, Brannon Denning, Glenn Reynolds
College of Law Faculty Scholarship
Written for a paper symposium on Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), we describe the effects of the decision on what had seemed a renewed interest on the part of the Court to limit federal power.
Rock, Paper, Scissors: Choosing The Right Vehicle For Federal Corporate Governance Initiatives, Joan Macleod Heminway
Rock, Paper, Scissors: Choosing The Right Vehicle For Federal Corporate Governance Initiatives, Joan Macleod Heminway
Scholarly Works
This article acknowledges the trend toward federalizing aspects of corporate governance (as evidenced by, among other things, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) and offers a model for institutional choice in federal corporate governance rulemaking. Specifically, the article suggests a way to determine whether the components of a specific substantive rule of corporate governance should be legislated by Congress, regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or established by the federal courts. Both the thesis of the article and the specific analytical framework it promotes are foundational in corporate governance scholarship and draw from previous research and scholarship in law (including …
Discussion: A Focus On Federalism, Jeffrey B. Morris
Discussion: A Focus On Federalism, Jeffrey B. Morris
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Subsidiarity, Federalism, And Federal Prosecution Of Street Crime, John F. Stinneford
Subsidiarity, Federalism, And Federal Prosecution Of Street Crime, John F. Stinneford
John F. Stinneford
No abstract provided.