Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Communications Policy For The Next Four Years, Conrad Burns
Communications Policy For The Next Four Years, Conrad Burns
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Four More Years... Of The Status Quo? How Simple Principles Can Lead Us Out Of The Regulatory Wilderness, Adam Thierer
Four More Years... Of The Status Quo? How Simple Principles Can Lead Us Out Of The Regulatory Wilderness, Adam Thierer
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Time For Change On Media Cross-Ownership Regulation, John F. Sturm
Time For Change On Media Cross-Ownership Regulation, John F. Sturm
Federal Communications Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Pitfalls Of International Integration: A Comment On The Bush Proposal And Its Aftermath, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah
The Pitfalls Of International Integration: A Comment On The Bush Proposal And Its Aftermath, Reuven S. Avi-Yonah
Articles
In January 2003, the Bush Administration proposed a new system for taxing corporate dividends, under which domestic shareholders in U.S. corporations would not be taxed on dividends they received, provided the corporation distributed these dividends out of after-tax earnings (the “Bush Proposal”). The Bush Proposal was introduced in Congress on February 27, 2003. Ultimately, however, Congress balked at enacting full-?edged dividend exemption. Instead, in the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (“JGTRRA”) as enacted on May 28, 2003, a lower rate of 15% was adopted for dividends paid by domestic and certain foreign corporations,1 and the capital …
“While Dangers Gather”: The Bush Preemption Doctrine, Battered Women, Imminence And Anticipatory Self-Defense, Jane Campbell Moriarty
“While Dangers Gather”: The Bush Preemption Doctrine, Battered Women, Imminence And Anticipatory Self-Defense, Jane Campbell Moriarty
Jane Campbell Moriarty
Since the Bush Administration issued its controversial Preemption Doctrine, which claims to permit the United States to unilaterally and preemptively attack a putative enemy deemed to be a threat to national security, I have been rethinking the concept of self-defense as it applies to battered women who kill their abusers. When President George W. Bush spoke about the peril of not taking action “while dangers gather,” I thought about the thousands of battered women in the grip of domestic terrorists who must also make decisions about when and whether to use violence to save their own lives. This article concludes …