Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Federalist Dimension Of Regulatory Takings Jurisprudence, Stewart E. Sterk Nov 2004

The Federalist Dimension Of Regulatory Takings Jurisprudence, Stewart E. Sterk

Articles

Conventional wisdom teaches that the Supreme Court's takings doctrine is a muddle. Appearances, however, are deceiving. The "property" protected by the Takings Clause is defined not by a single sovereign, but by the legislative enactments and judicial pronouncements of fifty separate states. As a result, federalism concerns - underappreciated in the takings literature - do and should play an important role in shaping the Court's takings doctrine. In particular, these concerns make it inappropriate for the Court to use the Takings Clause as a vehicle for articulating a comprehensive theory of the limits on government power to regulate land. This …


Eminent Domain Actions Targeting First Amendment Land Uses, Shelley Ross Saxer Jun 2004

Eminent Domain Actions Targeting First Amendment Land Uses, Shelley Ross Saxer

Missouri Law Review

This Article advocates that courts should distinguish between typical land use regulation and should impose stricter constitutional limitations on the eminent domain power. Under our current concept of public welfare the potential for government abuse of its eminent domain power is great. The government's attempt to eliminate an undersirable, but constitutionally protected, use from its community through condemnation must be carefully scrutinized to ensure that there is not an impermissible motive behind the action. Eminent domain actions targeting land uses protected by the First Amendment should be subject to heightened scrutiny.


Public Ruses, James E. Krier, Christopher Serkin Jan 2004

Public Ruses, James E. Krier, Christopher Serkin

Articles

The public use requirement of eminent domain law may be working its way back into the United States Constitution. To be sure, the words "public use" appear in the document-and in many state constitutions as well, but the federal provision applies to the states in any event-as one of the Fifth Amendment's limitations on the government's inherent power to take private property against the will of its owners. (The other limitation is that "just compensation" must be paid, of which more later.) Any taking of private property, the text suggests, must be for public use. Those words, however, have amounted …


Public Ruses, Christopher Serkin, James E. Krier Jan 2004

Public Ruses, Christopher Serkin, James E. Krier

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

The Fifth Amendment's public use requirement - a dead letter for decades - has recently been resurrected by the Michigan Supreme Court, overruling Poletown, and by the United States Supreme Court, granting certiorari in Kelo v. City of New London. At issue in these cases is the government's ability to condemn property from one private property owner and retransfer it to another, usually with a justification of more-or-less indirect economic benefits to the community. This Essay first argues the legitimacy of these government actions exists on a spectrum from true public uses, to public ruses that primarily benefit private interests …


The Police Power And The Takings Clause, D. Benjamin Barros Jan 2004

The Police Power And The Takings Clause, D. Benjamin Barros

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.


Private Lands Conservation In The Federated States Of Micronesia, Kevin Doran, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Jan 2004

Private Lands Conservation In The Federated States Of Micronesia, Kevin Doran, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Books, Reports, and Studies

74 p. ; 28 cm


Making Eminent Domain Humane, Ralph Nader, Alan Hirsch Jan 2004

Making Eminent Domain Humane, Ralph Nader, Alan Hirsch

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.