Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (33)
- Suffolk University (14)
- University of Colorado Law School (14)
- BLR (11)
- SelectedWorks (8)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- Selected Works (5)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Mercer University School of Law (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (4)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Litigation (13)
- Practice and Procedure (11)
- Courts (6)
- Surface water (6)
- Dispute Resolution (5)
-
- Judges (5)
- Propiedad Industrial - Trademarks, Patents & Copyright (5)
- Water quality (5)
- Class action (4)
- Groundwater (4)
- Jurisdiction (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Civil procedure (3)
- Colorado (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (3)
- Derecho de la Competencia - Antitrust (3)
- Due process (3)
- ESA (3)
- Empirical studies (3)
- Evidence (3)
- Federal Circuit decisions (3)
- Government Contracts (3)
- Hydrology (3)
- International Law (3)
- Irrigation (3)
- Kansas (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Pumping (3)
- Publication
-
- UIC Law Review (32)
- Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy (14)
- ExpressO (11)
- Groundwater in the West (Summer Conference, June 16-18) (10)
- Gabriel Martinez Medrano (8)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Articles (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- American University Law Review (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Materials from All Student Organizations (4)
- Mercer Law Review (4)
- NYLS Law Review (4)
- Oklahoma Law Review (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Introduction to the Legal Foundation of Federal Land Management (December 1-3) (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Publications (2)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- Alan D. Minuskin (1)
- Alani Golanski (1)
- Articles & Book Chapters (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 166
Full-Text Articles in Law
Agenda: Introduction To The Legal Foundation Of Federal Land Management, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: Introduction To The Legal Foundation Of Federal Land Management, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Introduction to the Legal Foundation of Federal Land Management (December 1-3)
Materials prepared for the course held at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado on December 1-3, 2004
Course instructors: Charles Wilkinson; Sarah Krakoff; Kathryn Mutz; Ann Morgan; Maggie Fox
Contents:
Introduction -- Agenda -- Summaries of laws -- Case studies. Travel management; Oil and gas development; Timber/fuels reduction -- How to influence agency decision makers -- Natural resource related legal and policy resources for the non-legal professional
Introduction To The Legal Foundation Of Federal Land Management, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Introduction To The Legal Foundation Of Federal Land Management, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Introduction to the Legal Foundation of Federal Land Management (December 1-3)
1 v. (various pagings) : ill., maps ; 28 cm
Materials prepared for the course held at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado on December 1-3, 2004
Course instructors: Charles Wilkinson; Sarah Krakoff; Kathryn Mutz; Ann Morgan; Maggie Fox
Contents:
Introduction -- Agenda -- Summaries of laws -- Case studies. Travel management; Oil and gas development; Timber/fuels reduction -- How to influence agency decision makers -- Natural resource related legal and policy resources for the non-legal professional
Uberregulation Without Economics: The World Trade Organization's Decision In The U.S.-Mexico Arbitration On Telecommunications Services, General Agreement On Trade In Services, Gats, J. Gregory Sidak, Hal J. Singer
Uberregulation Without Economics: The World Trade Organization's Decision In The U.S.-Mexico Arbitration On Telecommunications Services, General Agreement On Trade In Services, Gats, J. Gregory Sidak, Hal J. Singer
Federal Communications Law Journal
In April 2004, a World Trade Organization ("WTO") arbitration panel found that Mexico had violated its commitments under the Annex on Telecommunications to the General Agreement on Trade in Services ("GATS") by failing to ensure that Telmex, Mexico's largest supplier of basic telecommunications services, provide interconnection to U.S. telecommunications carriers at international settlement rates that were costoriented. The WTO panel deemed long run average incremental cost ("LRAIC") to be the appropriate cost standard for setting settlement rates. Mexico thus became obliged to change its domestic telecommunications regulations or face trade sanctions. The decision is the first WTO arbitration to deal …
Appellate Practice And Procedure, Roland F. L. Hall
Appellate Practice And Procedure, Roland F. L. Hall
Mercer Law Review
This Article surveys noteworthy decisions addressing appellate practice and procedure handed down by the Georgia appellate courts. The reviewed decisions fall into the following categories: (1) appellate jurisdiction; (2) preserving the record; (3) notice of appeal; (4) timeliness of appeal; and (5) miscellaneous cases of interest. Although there were no dramatic developments during the survey period, the courts addressed several topics of interest to the practitioner, particularly in the areas of preserving issues for appeal and correctly drafting the notice of appeal.
Trial Practice And Procedure, Jason L. Crawford, J. Clay Fuller, Dustin T. Brown, Kate S. Cook
Trial Practice And Procedure, Jason L. Crawford, J. Clay Fuller, Dustin T. Brown, Kate S. Cook
Mercer Law Review
During this survey period, the Georgia Supreme Court and Georgia Court of Appeals issued several noteworthy opinions on topics of interest to practitioners. This Article will address these judicial opinions that cover, among other topics, the issues of damages, immunity, the attorney-client relationship, indemnification, jurisdiction and venue, statutes of limitation, standing, and trial procedure. This Article will also address several developments in Georgia's statutory law impacting trial practice and procedure.
Government Corruption And The Right Of Access To Courts, Una A. Kim
Government Corruption And The Right Of Access To Courts, Una A. Kim
Michigan Law Review
This Note addresses the question left unanswered in Harbury: whether these denial of access-to-courts cases, which Justice Souter termed "backward-looking" access claims, are valid exercises of a constitutional right. Backward-looking access claims such as Harbury's differ from traditional denial of access-to-courts claims in that their aim is not to remove impediments to bringing causes of action in the future. Rather, backward-looking access claims allege that a suit that could have been filed in the past was not brought or was not litigated effectively, because access to the courts was at that time denied or obstructed by government officials. …
A Post-Vieth Strategy For Litigating Partisan Gerrymandering Claims, James A. Gardner
A Post-Vieth Strategy For Litigating Partisan Gerrymandering Claims, James A. Gardner
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
Procedural Due Process Aspects Of District Of Columbia Eviction Procedures, Lynn E. Cunningham
Procedural Due Process Aspects Of District Of Columbia Eviction Procedures, Lynn E. Cunningham
ExpressO
The District of Columbia Superior Court, Landlord and Tenant Branch, administers the local Forcible Entry and Detainer statute in a manner that arguably violates standards of adequate notice under the Due Process Clause.
Comparison To Criminal Sanctions In The Constitutional Review Of Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Comparison To Criminal Sanctions In The Constitutional Review Of Punitive Damages, Colleen P. Murphy
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Appeal Rates And Outcomes In Tried And Nontried Cases: Further Exploration Of Anti-Plaintiff Appellate Outcomes, Theodore Eisenberg
Appeal Rates And Outcomes In Tried And Nontried Cases: Further Exploration Of Anti-Plaintiff Appellate Outcomes, Theodore Eisenberg
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Federal data sets covering district court and appellate court civil cases for cases terminating in fiscal years 1988 through 2000 are analyzed. Appeals are filed in 10.9 percent of filed cases, and 21.0 percent of cases if one limits the sample to cases with a definitive judgment for plaintiff or defendant. The appeal rate is 39.6 percent in tried cases compared to 10.0 percent of nontried cases. For cases with definitive judgments, the appeal filing rate is 19.0 percent in nontried cases and 40.9 percent in tried cases. Tried cases with definitive judgments are appealed to a conclusion on the …
Pretext, Transparency And Motive In Mass Restitution Litigation, Anthony J. Sebok
Pretext, Transparency And Motive In Mass Restitution Litigation, Anthony J. Sebok
Vanderbilt Law Review
On February 23, 1993 The Washington Post published an article entitled, "Tobacco's Last Gasp? Towards a Smoke-Free Society." The article tested the hypothesis that in the near future no one would smoke in the United States. Its focus was on means: how would America reach a point when virtually no one smoked? The predictions ran the usual gamut of policy devices. Although their order of appearance may be random, the list was as follows: legal prohibitions on smoking in public, taxes, social pressure, increased health insurance costs to smokers, and (finally) litigation.
The Washington Post article noted that just one …
Mitigation And The Americans With Disabilities Act, Jill Elaine Hasday
Mitigation And The Americans With Disabilities Act, Jill Elaine Hasday
Michigan Law Review
It is an open question whether the prohibition on employment discrimination in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects plaintiffs who have not attempted to mitigate the effect of their disability on their ability to work. Suppose, for example, that a job applicant has severely impaired vision because of a corneal disease. He can have corneal transplant surgery that his doctors recommend and expect will allow him to see much more clearly, but he does not want to have the surgery because of the complications sometimes associated with the operation and the possibility that the surgery will not work. He …
Doing Good, Doing Well, Howard M. Erichson
Doing Good, Doing Well, Howard M. Erichson
Vanderbilt Law Review
On the fiftieth anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education,' it is fitting that we should take account not only of what has become of school desegregation but also of the heroic public interest lawyer figure embodied by Thurgood Marshall. For his role as "the chief litigator for the civil rights movement," Marshall is widely regarded as a preeminent role model for public interest lawyers. Descriptions of Marshall's career as a public interest advocate emphasize not only his ability to "use the legal system as a tool for social change," but also his personal sacrifice as a lawyer who persevered …
Why Do Plaintiffs Sue Private Parties Under Section 1983, Jack M. Beermann
Why Do Plaintiffs Sue Private Parties Under Section 1983, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
The subject of this article is why people make federal cases, under section 1983,' out of claims they have against private parties. Section 1983 provides a cause of action against "any person" who, while acting "under color of' state law, subjects or causes the plaintiff to be subjected to a violation of federal constitutional or statutory rights. The requirement that the defendant act under color of law means that the typical section 1983 claim is brought against state and local government officials or entities, not against private individuals or entities. However, there are situations in which a private party (i.e. …
Electronic Discovery Sanctions In The Twenty-First Century, Shira A. Scheindlin, Kachana Wangkeo
Electronic Discovery Sanctions In The Twenty-First Century, Shira A. Scheindlin, Kachana Wangkeo
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
At the federal level, the Civil Rules Advisory Committee has responded to the "unique and necessary feature of computer systems--the automatic recycling, overwriting, and alteration of electronically stored information"--with a proposed amendment to Rule 37. The proposed Rule 37(f) would shield litigants from sanctions for the destruction of electronic data if the party "took reasonable steps to preserve the information after it knew or should have known the information was discoverable in the action" and "the failure resulted from the loss of the information because of the routine operation of the party's electronic information system." The safe harbor provision would …
Fear-Mongering Torts And The Exaggerated Death Of Diving, Carl Bogus
Fear-Mongering Torts And The Exaggerated Death Of Diving, Carl Bogus
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
My First Appellate Argument: It Can Only Get Better, Jon O. Newman
My First Appellate Argument: It Can Only Get Better, Jon O. Newman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Minnesota's Pro Bono Appellate Program: A Simple Approach That Achieves Important Objectives, Thomas H. Boyd
Minnesota's Pro Bono Appellate Program: A Simple Approach That Achieves Important Objectives, Thomas H. Boyd
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Opt-Outs And Objectors In Class Action Litigation: Theoretical And Empirical Issues, Theodore Eisenberg, Geoffrey P. Miller
The Role Of Opt-Outs And Objectors In Class Action Litigation: Theoretical And Empirical Issues, Theodore Eisenberg, Geoffrey P. Miller
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Effects Of Malpractice Tort Reform On Defensive Medicine, Katherine D. Hennesy, Heather M. O'Neill
The Effects Of Malpractice Tort Reform On Defensive Medicine, Katherine D. Hennesy, Heather M. O'Neill
Business and Economics Faculty Publications
Positive defensive medicine occurs when physicians order additional tests or procedures primarily to avoid malpractice liability. This paper shows the degree of defensive medicine occurring across states is related to the malpractice environment in the states. As the environment changes due to malpractice tort reform, defensive medicine practices also change. This paper shows the existence of positive defensive medicine and how it adds to total health care expenditures for head trauma victims in 23 states in 2000. Moreover, given different malpractice environments across states, we witness variations in defensive medicine practices leading to differences in health care expenditures.
The Public And Private Faces Of Derivative Lawsuits, Robert B. Thompson, Randall S. Thomas
The Public And Private Faces Of Derivative Lawsuits, Robert B. Thompson, Randall S. Thomas
Vanderbilt Law Review
Are shareholder derivative suits at death's door? Once described as "the most important procedure the law has yet developed to police the internal affairs of corporations,"' derivative suits are today regularly portrayed as nuisance suits whose "principal beneficiaries ... are attorneys." Even if these critics are wrong, there may now be less need for derivative suits, as other forms of representative suits have grown up that do much of their work. Federal securities fraud class actions increasingly address legal claims that raise issues about management care, and fiduciary duty class actions under state law are the principal litigation vehicle to …
How Like A Winter? The Plight Of Absent Class Members Denied Adequate Representation, Susan P. Koniak
How Like A Winter? The Plight Of Absent Class Members Denied Adequate Representation, Susan P. Koniak
Faculty Scholarship
Class actions assume absent class members. 2 Notices in class actions tell class members that they need not show up in the courthouse, although they may if they choose.3 Class members are told that class counsel and the named class representatives will look out for them, although if they choose to hire their own lawyer, she may appear on their behalf.4 They are also routinely told that once the decision in the class action becomes final they will be bound by it, losing any and all right to protest the resolution of their claims by the class action …
Taking Adequacy Seriously: The Inadequate Assessment Of Adequacy In Litigation And Settlement Classes, Linda S. Mullenix
Taking Adequacy Seriously: The Inadequate Assessment Of Adequacy In Litigation And Settlement Classes, Linda S. Mullenix
Vanderbilt Law Review
In the past decade, the debate over settlement classes has moved considerably beyond the "sturm und drang" inspired by the epic settlement classes in Amchem Products, Incorporated. v. Windsor' and Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corporation. Whereas Amchem asked whether and on what terms federal courts were authorized to approve settlement classes, and Ortiz asked whether a mandatory, limited- fund global asbestos settlement was sustainable, the settlement class issue du jour focuses on the ability of litigants to collaterally attack settlements in remote forums and at remote times.
Because the collateral attack problem is so vital to the sanctity of settlement classes, …
Will The Ninth Circuit Be Reversed In Banaitis V. Commissioner?, Richard Mason
Will The Ninth Circuit Be Reversed In Banaitis V. Commissioner?, Richard Mason
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Rise Of Managerial Judging In International Criminal Law, Maximo Langer
The Rise Of Managerial Judging In International Criminal Law, Maximo Langer
ExpressO
Abstract This article puts the procedure of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in a completely new and previously unexplored light. Rejecting the predominant view of ICTY procedure as a hybrid between the adversarial system of the U.S. and the inquisitorial system of civil law jurisdictions, this article shows that ICTY procedure is best described through a third procedural model that does not fit in either of the two traditional systems. This third procedural model is close to the managerial judging system that has been adopted in U.S. civil procedure. The article then explores some of the …
Another Limit On Federal Court Jurisdiction? Immigrant Access To Class-Wide Injunctive Relief, Jill E. Family
Another Limit On Federal Court Jurisdiction? Immigrant Access To Class-Wide Injunctive Relief, Jill E. Family
ExpressO
This article examines a statute that may embody another limit on the power of the federal courts. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) implemented sweeping changes that substantially restrict federal court review of administrative immigration decisions. One provision implemented as a part of IIRIRA, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f)(1), appears, at least at first glance, to prohibit courts from issuing class-wide injunctive relief in immigration cases. Such a restriction would be significant because federal courts have issued class-wide injunctions in the past to stop unconstitutional immigration practices and policies of the federal government. The Supreme Court …
Good Faith In The Cisg: Interpretation Problems In Article 7, Benedict C. Sheehy
Good Faith In The Cisg: Interpretation Problems In Article 7, Benedict C. Sheehy
ExpressO
ABSTRACT: This article examines the dispute concerning the meaning of Good Faith in the CISG. Although there are good reasons for arguing a more limited interpretation or more limited application of Good Faith, there are also good reasons for a broader approach. Regardless of the correct interpretation, however, practitioners and academics need to have a sense of where the actual jurisprudence is going. This article reviews every published case on Article 7 since its inception and concludes that while there is little to suggest a strong pattern is developing, a guided pattern while incorrect doctrinally is preferable to the current …
Dead Men Telling Tales - A Policy-Based Proposal For Survivability Of Qui Tam Actions Under The Civil False Claims Act, Vickie J. Williams
Dead Men Telling Tales - A Policy-Based Proposal For Survivability Of Qui Tam Actions Under The Civil False Claims Act, Vickie J. Williams
ExpressO
The civil False Claims Act is a powerful tool used by both the federal government and private citizens, under the statutes "qui tam" or "whistleblower" provisions, to fight fraud against the government. Use of the statute has continually risen in recent years, and recoveries under the statute are in the billions of dollars. The unique relationship between a private citizen whistleblower and the government who both have an interest in the case raises many interesting procedural and substantive issues of federal law. This article proposes an answer to one of these questions. The article proposes that a whistleblower suit survives …
Moot Court Executive Board And Teams 2004-2005, Kellie Casey Monk
Moot Court Executive Board And Teams 2004-2005, Kellie Casey Monk
Materials from All Student Organizations
No abstract provided.
Settling Significant Cases, Jeffrey R. Seul
Settling Significant Cases, Jeffrey R. Seul
Washington Law Review
Negotiation, mediation, and other consensus-based alternatives to litigation are most often studied and defended in the context of ordinary disputes, in which liability and distributive issues are contested, but the background norms that govern the outcome of a lawsuit are not. Many consider adjudication to be the only acceptable process for addressing "significant cases": disputes about abortion, school prayer, the environment, and other value-laden issues in which background norms are contested. I argue that this perspective is ironic because litigation, like negotiation, entails compromise. Litigation is a lottery in which the substantive values a party seeks to defend, and which …