Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Intellectual Property Law (14)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (3)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Business (1)
-
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Economic Policy (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- International Law (1)
- International Trade Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Life Sciences (1)
- Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Research Methods in Life Sciences (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Technology and Innovation (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 20 of 20
Full-Text Articles in Law
35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6—Means For Better Patent Protection, Bryan K. Wheelock, Evan R. Sotiriou
35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6—Means For Better Patent Protection, Bryan K. Wheelock, Evan R. Sotiriou
Saint Louis University Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Use Of Neutral Fact-Finding To Preserve Exclusive Rights And Uphold The Disclosure Purpose Of The Patent System, Brian Panka
Use Of Neutral Fact-Finding To Preserve Exclusive Rights And Uphold The Disclosure Purpose Of The Patent System, Brian Panka
Journal of Dispute Resolution
This comment proposes the use of neutral fact-finding as a precursor to litigation of patent disputes. Section II begins with a brief introduction to the concept of patents and the system used in the United States for granting and protecting exclusive rights associated with patent grants. Then, Section III discusses traditional ADR processes available to resolve patent disputes and sets forth reasons those processes are not widely used. Finally, Section IV offers neutral factfinding as a solution to both litigation and traditional ADR process concerns with respect to resolving patent disputes
Resolving The Patent-Antitrust Paradox Through Tripartite Innovation, Michael A. Carrier
Resolving The Patent-Antitrust Paradox Through Tripartite Innovation, Michael A. Carrier
Vanderbilt Law Review
The issues presented by-the intersection of the patent system and the antitrust laws have never been as pressing as they are today. The number of issued patents is skyrocketing. Companies are more frequently entering into arrangements with competitors not only to recover their investment from creating patented products but also to avoid the patent landmines that line the path of innovation. They form patent pools for laser eye surgery, MPEG-2 video compression technology, and DVD formatting; enter into alliances, mergers, and settlements in the biopharmaceutical industry; refuse to license their patented products in various industries; and cross-license their patents in …
Can't We All Get Along? The Case For A Workable Patent Model, Srividhya Ragavan
Can't We All Get Along? The Case For A Workable Patent Model, Srividhya Ragavan
Faculty Scholarship
The global move towards a trade regime has been impeded by challenges of poverty and health crisis for the developing nations. Until now, the developed nations have touted the establishment of a trade regime as envisaged under TRIPS as the solution for the national challenges. This paper examines the effectiveness of TRIPS as a mechanism to move towards a trade regime. It argues that the patent policy in TRIPS cannot gear the world towards patent harmonization but can potentially adversely impact the developed nations and the post-world war trade structure. The impediments affecting the effectiveness of TRIPS as a harmonizing …
Panel I: The End Of Equivalents? Examining The Fallout From Festo, J. Michael Jakes, Herbert Michael Schwartz, Harold C. Wegner
Panel I: The End Of Equivalents? Examining The Fallout From Festo, J. Michael Jakes, Herbert Michael Schwartz, Harold C. Wegner
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Festering Questions After Festo, Harold C. Wegner
Festering Questions After Festo, Harold C. Wegner
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Advancing Science While Protecting Developing Countries From Exloitation Of Their Resources And Knowledge, Elizabeth Longacre
Advancing Science While Protecting Developing Countries From Exloitation Of Their Resources And Knowledge, Elizabeth Longacre
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Patently Unconstitutional: The Geographical Limitation On Prior Art In A Small World, Margo A. Bagley
Patently Unconstitutional: The Geographical Limitation On Prior Art In A Small World, Margo A. Bagley
Faculty Articles
Part I of this Article provides an overview of § 102 of the Patent Act, the role of prior art in the patentability analysis, and the origin of the limitation on relevant non-patent, nonpublished art to that existing "in this country." Part II then analyzes the constitutional deficiency of the limitation in light of the express and implied purposes of the Intellectual Property Clause as informed by judicial decisions, technological changes, global contraction, and expanded notions of inventive research sources. Policy concerns are the focus of Part III, which discusses how § 102's geographical limitation facilitates forms of "biopiracy," conflicts …
Tailoring Patent Policy To Specific Industries, Dan L. Burk
Tailoring Patent Policy To Specific Industries, Dan L. Burk
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Mr. Burk illustrates that federal courts have diverged along industry-specific paths when deciding patent cases. Burk highlights courts' disparate treatment of the biotechnology and computer software industries within the uniform patent statute. Due to industries' differing requirements for innovation and development, Professor Burk argues that the currently general patent statute and its incentive to innovate may be improved by tailoring it to specific industries. Burk creates a dialogue on what kinds of statutory schemes promote innovation. Citing the Supreme Court's statement in Diamond v. Chakrabarty that the patent statute is meant to cover anything under the sun made by man, …
The Role Of Intellectual Property Rights In Negotiating And Planning A Research Joint Venture, Kurt M. Saunders
The Role Of Intellectual Property Rights In Negotiating And Planning A Research Joint Venture, Kurt M. Saunders
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
This Article considers the role of intellectual property rights in research joint ventures. Professor Saunders begins by outlining the various advantages of pursuing research in a joint venture business form, including the sharing of expertise and investment costs. The author identifies and elucidates the intellectual property issues, as well as related licensing and antitrust implications, that arise in the joint venture context. Most notably, Saunders articulates the different intellectual property concerns that surface at each separate stage-from negotiation and planning, to termination of the collaboration.
Stemming The Stem Cell Setback, Patrick J. Fleis
Stemming The Stem Cell Setback, Patrick J. Fleis
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
This Comment highlights the recent federal funding setbacks in the biotechnology industry and considers the resulting challenges to future research collaboration. After providing a historical background to stem cell technology, Mr. Fleis examines the passionately opposed public responses to the technology's use of embryos and to its future applications. Fleis continues by noting past legislative initiatives that have accelerated the ease of patenting biotechnology and research findings in general. The Comment addresses several possible solutions to the tension between limited government funding and continued stem cell research, such as the adoption of a more relaxed experimental use standard. Stem cell …
Are The U.S. Patent Priority Rules Really Necessary?, Colleen Chien, Mark Lemley
Are The U.S. Patent Priority Rules Really Necessary?, Colleen Chien, Mark Lemley
Faculty Publications
In this Article, we study U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) interference proceedings and court cases in which the parties dispute who is first to invent. We find that the first person to file is usually, but by no means always, also the first to invent. In over 40% of the cases, the first to invent is last to file. We also find that the long-standing rule that discriminated against foreign inventors by requiring proof of inventive activity in the U.S. had surprisingly little effect on outcomes; that a large number of priority disputes involve near-simultaneous invention; and that the …
Pharmacogenomics, Genetic Tests, And Patent-Based Incentives, Michael J. Meurer
Pharmacogenomics, Genetic Tests, And Patent-Based Incentives, Michael J. Meurer
Faculty Scholarship
Pharmacogenomics promises to revolutionize medicine by using genetic information to guide drug therapy. Genetic tests will help doctors improve drug safety and efficacy by better matching patients and drugs. This Article evaluates the effectiveness of patent-based incentives to create genetic tests, and the optimal mix of public and private sector pharmacogenomic R&D. Drug patent owners have a strong incentive to develop genetic tests that predict adverse drug reactions and allow them to market drugs that otherwise would be shelved. Incentives are also strong for genetic tests that are created as part of the drug development process. Incentives tend to be …
How Dewey Classify Oclc's Lawsuit, Roger V. Skalbeck
How Dewey Classify Oclc's Lawsuit, Roger V. Skalbeck
Law Faculty Publications
In order to understand the nature of the rights asserted here, it is important to properly classify the Dewey Decimal lawsuit. To these ends, this article presents analysis aimed to better define its scope and legal framework. This is not an analysis of the merits of the claims, let alone a prediction as to the outcome. The issues are considered in the following three sections. In closing, I offer a lighthearted suggestion as to how this suit might be resolved outside of litigation or settlement.
Anticompetitive Settlement Of Intellectual Property Disputes, Mark D. Janis, Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Mark A. Lemley
Anticompetitive Settlement Of Intellectual Property Disputes, Mark D. Janis, Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Mark A. Lemley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Anticompetitive Settlement Of Intellectual Property Disputes, Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Mark D. Janis, Mark A. Lemley
Anticompetitive Settlement Of Intellectual Property Disputes, Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Mark D. Janis, Mark A. Lemley
All Faculty Scholarship
The overwhelming majority of intellectual property lawsuits settle before trial. These settlements involve agreements between the patentee and the accused infringer, parties who are often competitors before the lawsuit. Because these competitors may agree to stop competing, to regulate the price each charges, and to exchange information about products and prices, settlements of intellectual property disputes naturally raise antitrust concerns. In this paper, we suggest a way to reconcile the interests of intellectual property law and antitrust law in evaluating intellectual property settlements. In Part I, we provide background on the issue. Part II argues that in most cases courts …
The Case For Registering Patents And The Law And Economics Of Present Patent-Obtaining Rules, F. Scott Kieff
The Case For Registering Patents And The Law And Economics Of Present Patent-Obtaining Rules, F. Scott Kieff
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
The legal rules for determining whether an inventor is entitled to a patent are presently enforced in the first instance by the Patent Office through ex parte examination of patent applications. Critics of various aspects of the patent system suggest that these rules should be ratcheted up in some way, subjecting patents to more scrutiny during Patent Office examination. Departing from existing literature, this paper offers a hypothetical model system under which patent applications are merely registered, not examined, to show how hard look approaches like examination increase social costs over soft look approaches like registration. The paper presents a …
Controlling Opportunistic And Anti-Competitive Intellectual Property Litigation, Michael J. Meurer
Controlling Opportunistic And Anti-Competitive Intellectual Property Litigation, Michael J. Meurer
Faculty Scholarship
It is useful to think of intellectual property (IP) law both as a system of property rights that promotes the production of valuable information and as a system of government regulation that unintentionally promotes socially harmful rent-seeking. This Article analyzes methods of controlling rent-seeking costs associated with opportunistic and anti-competitive IP lawsuits. My thinking is guided to some extent by the analysis of procedural measures for controlling frivolous litigation, and analysis of antitrust reforms designed to control strategic abuse of antitrust law. These analogies lead me to focus on pre-trial and post-trial control measures that reduce the credibility of weak …
Intellectual Property Law, Wendy J. Gordon
Intellectual Property Law, Wendy J. Gordon
Faculty Scholarship
This chapter for the OXFORD HANDBOOK ON LEGAL STUDIES provides an overview of the theoretical literature in Intellectual Property, and suggests directions for further study. The emphasis is on economic analysis, but effort is made to embrace other perspectives as well.
An Incentives Approach To Patent Settlements: A Commentary On Hovenkamp, Janis & Lemley, Maureen A. O'Rourke
An Incentives Approach To Patent Settlements: A Commentary On Hovenkamp, Janis & Lemley, Maureen A. O'Rourke
Faculty Scholarship
Professors Hovenkamp, Janis, and Lemley have attempted to clarify one of the most vexing issues facing antitrust and intellectual property law today: What analytical framework should antitrust authorities and courts use in considering whether patent settlement agreements in infringement cases violate the antitrust laws? The issue is complex because many ostensibly anticompetitive restraints in settlement agreements are perfectly legal if the underlying patent right is valid. Unfortunately, in some cases, the relevant patents are either invalid or not infringed. Thus, the antitrust analysis hinges on resolution of an intellectual property question.