Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Ex parte Quirin (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Military tribunals (2)
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (2)
- Abortion (1)
-
- Adverse employment action (1)
- Article Five (1)
- Balance of forces (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Disparate treatment (1)
- Empire of liberty (1)
- Executive (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Louisiana Treaty (1)
- Presidential (1)
- Retaliation (1)
- Roe v. Wade (1)
- Sexual harassment (1)
- States' rights (1)
- Stenberg v. Carhart (1)
- Thomas Jefferson (1)
- Title VII (1)
- Treaty power (1)
- U.S. Constitution (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Detentions, Military Commissions, Terrorism And Domestic Case Precedent, Carl W. Tobias
Detentions, Military Commissions, Terrorism And Domestic Case Precedent, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Laura Dickinson's recent article in this journal substantially improves appreciation of how the United States has detained suspects and instituted military commissions as well as of the roles played by the controversial procedure and tribunals when fighting terrorism. She meticulously traces how detentions and the commissions evolved, trenchantly criticizes them, and persuasively shows international tribunals' comparative advantage. Dickinson accords relevant domestic case precedent a somewhat laconic analysis, however. For example, she briefly mentions separation-of-powers concerns and Supreme Court opinions that detentions and military commissions implicate while rather tersely assessing Ex parte Quirin, the Second World War decision on which …
Location And Life: How Stenberg V. Carhart Undercut Roe V. Wade, Richard Stith
Location And Life: How Stenberg V. Carhart Undercut Roe V. Wade, Richard Stith
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Balance Of Forces And The Empire Of Liberty: States' Rights And The Louisiana Purchase, Robert Knowles
The Balance Of Forces And The Empire Of Liberty: States' Rights And The Louisiana Purchase, Robert Knowles
Law Faculty Publications
This Article challenges the conventional wisdom about the Louisiana Treaty and argues that it was unconstitutional. As many students of history know, President Jefferson had serious misgivings about its constitutionality, which scholars have dismissed as driven by an overly strict construction of the Constitution. The Article concludes that Jefferson's concerns were in fact motivated primarily by respect for federalism principles.
This Article identifies and discusses the underlying conflict between two radically different visions of federalism. While Jefferson s Republicans believed that the incorporation of new states in the West would merely expand the Constitutions form of government to more territory, …
Parsing The Meaning Of "Adverse Employment Action" In Title Vii Disparate Treatment, Sexual Harassment, And Retaliation Claims: What Should Be Actionable Wrongdoing?, Rosalie Berger Levinson
Parsing The Meaning Of "Adverse Employment Action" In Title Vii Disparate Treatment, Sexual Harassment, And Retaliation Claims: What Should Be Actionable Wrongdoing?, Rosalie Berger Levinson
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Unmasking Federalism, Carl W. Tobias
Unmasking Federalism, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Judge John Noonan has astutely chronicled law and society over a half century. He was a professor for twenty-five years, authoring such classics as Persons and Masks of the Law, and has rendered distinguished service since 1985 on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.Thus, the publication of Narrowing the Nation's Power: The Supreme Court Sides with the States ("Narrowing') would be important, even if the monograph were only a venerated scholar's reflections on his long, rich experience. This book, however, is a provocative critique that meticulously and incisively exposes the Court's new federalism and separation of …
Quirin Revisited, Carl W. Tobias
Quirin Revisited, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Six decades ago, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Ex parte Quirin, in which the Justices determined that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt possessed the requisite constitutional authority to institute and use a military commission.
On November 13, 2001, President George W. Bush promulgated an Executive Order (Bush Order) that authorized the establishment and application of military commissions as well as purported to eliminate whatever jurisdiction federal courts might have by statute and to deny federal court access to individuals prosecuted or detained for terrorism. The Bush administration substantially premised that the Order and jurisdiction-stripping proviso on Ex parte Quirin. It has …