Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- European Union (2)
- Human rights (2)
- Sovereignty (2)
- Treaties (2)
- Accession law (1)
-
- Applicant Countries (1)
- Article 15 (1)
- Brannigan & McBride v. United Kingdom (1)
- Brogan and Others v. United Kingdom (1)
- Channel Islands (1)
- Committee of Twenty Four (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional Council (1)
- Customary Law (1)
- Decolonization (1)
- Derogation (1)
- Derogation clause (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Doctrine of State Necessity (1)
- Domestic power (1)
- ECHR (1)
- European Convention on Human Right (1)
- European Court of Human Rights (1)
- France (1)
- Gender Identity (1)
- Gibraltar (1)
- Hierarchy (1)
- Hierarchy of norms (1)
- Historic title (1)
- Homosexuals (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judicial Review And International Law, Michel Troper
Judicial Review And International Law, Michel Troper
San Diego International Law Journal
According to common doctrine, the courts, once established, apply the constitution, the principles expressed in the constitution, and also some principles not always expressed but that are thought to be inherent to any legal system, as for example the principle that the State is sovereign. Like the hierarchy of norms, these principles precede the institution of the courts and their jurisprudence, so that they can be used to evaluate them. True, the principles can be vague, but it is considered one of the tasks of constitutional theory to determine their substance before analyzing case law in their light.
The Echr And States Of Emergency: Article 15 - A Domestic Power Of Derogation From Human Rights Obligations, Mohamed M. El Zeidy
The Echr And States Of Emergency: Article 15 - A Domestic Power Of Derogation From Human Rights Obligations, Mohamed M. El Zeidy
San Diego International Law Journal
This study is divided into two sections. The first section is further divided into two subsections. The first subsection examines the problems in defining emergencies; in the second subsection, we will examine the preconditions required for a valid derogation. The second section determines the Strasbourg machinery for the protection of human rights. This section is also divided into four subsections. Each subsection examines separate case laws from the European Court of Human Rights. Finally, a conclusion will be deduced in the light of the former reviews.
Two Case Studies In Self-Determination: The Rock And The Bailiwick, Inge V. Porter
Two Case Studies In Self-Determination: The Rock And The Bailiwick, Inge V. Porter
San Diego International Law Journal
After looking at the concept of self-determination, its history, meaning, and possible future development in Part II, this Paper will develop two case studies. Part III examines the right of self-determination for the people of Gibraltar, analyzing the relevant U.N. resolutions, agreements, treaties, and legislation that have defined the dispute between Great Britain and Spain. For example, Great Britain has ruled the Rock of Gibraltar for 280 years, primarily using it as a military base; but, today, Spain insists that it did not relinquish absolute sovereignty over Gibraltar to the British by the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713. Part IV …
Finding Fundamental Fairness: Protecting The Rights Of Homosexuals Under European Union Accession Law, Travis J. Langenkamp
Finding Fundamental Fairness: Protecting The Rights Of Homosexuals Under European Union Accession Law, Travis J. Langenkamp
San Diego International Law Journal
In tackling the issue of sexual orientation discrimination, the European Union must make significant efforts to conform or, perhaps, eradicate incongruous legislation within Applicant Countries. The difficulty of this endeavor is two-fold: first, in terms of the number and complexity of the laws of each Applicant Country; and, second, in the absence of any detailed and systematic documentation of sexual orientation discrimination within those same Applicant Countries. Compounding, if not confounding, such legitimate endeavors are the inconsistent anti-gay legislation prevalent within the present Member States. The stakes are high for Member States and Applicant Countries alike. Thus, the European Union's …