Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Bar Exam (4)
- Law School (4)
- Legal Education (4)
- Comparative law (2)
- Counterterrorism (2)
-
- "Westside Mothers" (1)
- Assassination (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Corporate fiduciaries (1)
- Damages (1)
- Daubert Trilogy (1)
- Deficits of state control (1)
- Education of judges in expert testimony (1)
- Estate tax (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Executives' liability (1)
- Expert evidence (1)
- Family limited partnerships (1)
- Federal entitlement program (1)
- Federal estate tax laws (1)
- Federal sentencing guidelines (1)
- Federalization of Medicaid (1)
- Gender disparity (1)
- Harmless error (law) (1)
- Health care industry (1)
- Helath care industry (1)
- Immigration (1)
- International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 (1)
- International criminal law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Law
How Many Terrorists Are There? The Escalation In So-Called Terrorism Prosecutions, Nora V. Demleitner
How Many Terrorists Are There? The Escalation In So-Called Terrorism Prosecutions, Nora V. Demleitner
Scholarly Articles
Not available.
Revisiting Byrum, Brant J. Hellwig
Revisiting Byrum, Brant J. Hellwig
Scholarly Articles
In the landmark case of United States v. Byrum, the Supreme Court determined that a majority shareholder's retention of voting rights over stock transferred in trust did not cause the stock to be included in his gross estate under Section 2036(a)(1) or (a)(2). The Court grounded its decision in the fiduciary duty owed by the board of directors and the majority shareholder to exercise their discretion over corporate distributions to promote the best interests of the entity. Despite legislative action quickly reversing the Court's holding in Byrum, the case continued to influence decisions concerning the estate tax consequences of a …
Virginia Bar Exam, July 2003, Section 1
Virginia Bar Exam, July 2003, Section 1
Virginia Bar Exam Archive
No abstract provided.
Virginia Bar Exam, July 2003, Section 2
Virginia Bar Exam, July 2003, Section 2
Virginia Bar Exam Archive
No abstract provided.
Speaking Outdoors, Lewis H. Larue
Post-Trilogy Science In The Courtroom, Part Ii: What Are The Judges Still Doing?, David S. Caudill, Lewis H. Larue
Post-Trilogy Science In The Courtroom, Part Ii: What Are The Judges Still Doing?, David S. Caudill, Lewis H. Larue
Scholarly Articles
Not available.
Kimbell: Is The Party Over For Family Limited Partnerships, Brant J. Hellwig
Kimbell: Is The Party Over For Family Limited Partnerships, Brant J. Hellwig
Scholarly Articles
Professor Brant J. Hellwig of the University of South Carolina School of Law examines the impact of the recent Kimbell decision on the future use of family limited partnerships for estate planning purposes.
Assassination, The War On Terrorism, And The Constitution, Rodney A. Smolla
Assassination, The War On Terrorism, And The Constitution, Rodney A. Smolla
Scholarly Articles
Not available.
Virginia Bar Exam, February 2003, Section 2
Virginia Bar Exam, February 2003, Section 2
Virginia Bar Exam Archive
No abstract provided.
Virginia Bar Exam, February 2003, Section 1
Virginia Bar Exam, February 2003, Section 1
Virginia Bar Exam Archive
No abstract provided.
Fifteen Years Of Federal Guidelines Reviewed At The Yale Conference: What Would Success Mean?, Nora V. Demleitner
Fifteen Years Of Federal Guidelines Reviewed At The Yale Conference: What Would Success Mean?, Nora V. Demleitner
Scholarly Articles
Not available.
Comparative And International Health Law, Timothy Stoltzfus Jost
Comparative And International Health Law, Timothy Stoltzfus Jost
Scholarly Articles
No abstract provided.
When Is Enrichment Unjust? Restitution Visits An Onyx Bathroom, Doug Rendleman
When Is Enrichment Unjust? Restitution Visits An Onyx Bathroom, Doug Rendleman
Scholarly Articles
Not available.
Looking Up, Down And Across: The Icty's Place In The International Legal Order, Mark A. Drumbl
Looking Up, Down And Across: The Icty's Place In The International Legal Order, Mark A. Drumbl
Scholarly Articles
Not available.
After Enron: Remembering Loyalty Discourse In Corporate Law, Lyman P.Q. Johnson
After Enron: Remembering Loyalty Discourse In Corporate Law, Lyman P.Q. Johnson
Scholarly Articles
The demise of monetary damages as a remedy for breach of the corporate director duty of due care means that only a breach of the duty of loyalty or good faith affords the possibility of holding corporate directors personally liable for wrongdoing. The author argues that the fiduciary duty of loyalty contains both a widely appreciated, but rather minimal, "non-betrayal" aspect and a less appreciated, but more affirmative, "devotion" dimension. The affirmative. thrust of loyalty, grounded in widely-shared cultural norms and finding expression in myriad literary and religious stories, offers a doctrinal avenue for addressing a potentially broader range of …
A Comparative Study Of The Law Of Palliative Care And End-Of-Life Treatment, Denuta Mendelson, Timothy Stoltzfus Jost
A Comparative Study Of The Law Of Palliative Care And End-Of-Life Treatment, Denuta Mendelson, Timothy Stoltzfus Jost
Scholarly Articles
No abstract provided.
Abusing State Power Or Controlling Risk?: Sex Offender Commitment And Sicherungverwahrung, Nora V. Demleitner
Abusing State Power Or Controlling Risk?: Sex Offender Commitment And Sicherungverwahrung, Nora V. Demleitner
Scholarly Articles
This article addresses a paradigmatic risk-based collateral sanction, the so-called civil confinement. In contrast to many other collateral sanctions, it does not follow automatically but is judicially imposed following a hearing. In Hendricks v. Kansas (1997) the Supreme Court specifically upheld involuntary confinement following a criminal justice sentence for a sexually violent predator. The Kansas statute mandated confinement based on an assessment of dangerousness which had to result from a mental abnormality. Once it characterized the sanction as civil, the Court concluded that procedural protections traditional in the criminal context, such as double jeopardy, do not apply. The narrow majority …
How Much Do Western Democracies Value Famiily And Marriage? : Immigration Law's Conflicted Answers, Nora V. Demleitner
How Much Do Western Democracies Value Famiily And Marriage? : Immigration Law's Conflicted Answers, Nora V. Demleitner
Scholarly Articles
None available.
Self-Defence In An Age Of Terrorism: Introductory Remarks, Mark A. Drumbl
Self-Defence In An Age Of Terrorism: Introductory Remarks, Mark A. Drumbl
Scholarly Articles
None available.
Why Judges Applying The Daubert Trilogy Need To Know About The Social, Institutional, And Rhetorical -- And Not Just The Methodological Aspects Of Science, Lewis H. Larue, David S. Caudill
Why Judges Applying The Daubert Trilogy Need To Know About The Social, Institutional, And Rhetorical -- And Not Just The Methodological Aspects Of Science, Lewis H. Larue, David S. Caudill
Scholarly Articles
In response to the claim that many judges are deficient in their understanding of scientific methodology, this Article identifies in recent cases (i) a pragmatic perspective on the part of federal appellate judges when they reverse trial judges who tend to idealize science (i.e., who do not appreciate the local and practical goals and limitations of science), and (ii) an educational model of judicial gatekeeping that results in reversal of trial judges who defer to the social authority of science (i.e., who mistake authority for reliability). Next, this Article observes that courts (in the cases it analyzes) are not interested …
To Err Is Human: The Judicial Conundrum Of Curing Apprendi Error, Joshua A.T. Fairfield
To Err Is Human: The Judicial Conundrum Of Curing Apprendi Error, Joshua A.T. Fairfield
Scholarly Articles
Not available.
The Tenuous Nature Of The Medicaid Entitlement, Timothy Stoltzfus Jost
The Tenuous Nature Of The Medicaid Entitlement, Timothy Stoltzfus Jost
Scholarly Articles
Though Medicare was from the outset an entitlement under federal law, the status of Medicaid has always been less certain. Arguably, it was the Supreme Court, rather than Congress that first recognized that Medicaid recipients (and providers) could sue the states in federal court to enforce federal Medicaid requirements. A recent widely reported federal court decision, however, called radically into question the continuing existence of a federal Medicaid entitlement. Though this decision has now been reversed, and rejected by other courts, it illustrates the tenuous nature of the Medicaid entitlement, and the need to reconstitute Medicaid as an exclusively federal …