Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- New York Law School (10)
- SelectedWorks (7)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (5)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- BLR (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Selected Works (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Chapman University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (16)
- Courts (7)
- Judicial independence (7)
- Judicial review (7)
- Judge (6)
-
- Corte Suprema de la República Argentina (5)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- United States Supreme Court (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Empiricism (3)
- Formalism (3)
- Judge Henry Woods; (3)
- Judicial accountability (3)
- Judicial elections (3)
- Judicial opinions (3)
- Judiciary (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Roger J Miner (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Administration Law (2)
- Appointment (2)
- Article III (2)
- Blackstone (William) (2)
- Campaign (2)
- Campaign funds (2)
- Candidate (2)
- Common law (2)
- Confirmation (2)
- Congress (2)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Michigan Law Review (8)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (7)
- NYLS Law Review (6)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (5)
-
- Horacio M. LYNCH (5)
- Nevada Law Journal (5)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (4)
- Articles (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (2)
- ExpressO (2)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Popular Media (2)
- Publications and Research (2)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles About GGU Law (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Donald J. Kochan (1)
- Edward Ivan Cueva (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Hou Meng (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 91 - 109 of 109
Full-Text Articles in Law
Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue-Centered Theory Of Judging, Lawrence B. Solum
Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue-Centered Theory Of Judging, Lawrence B. Solum
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
"Virtue jurisprudence" is a normative and explanatory theory of law that utilizes the resources of virtue ethics to answer the central questions of legal theory. The main focus of the essay is the development of a virtue-centered theory of judging. The exposition of the theory begins with exploration of defects in judicial character such as corruption and incompetence. Next, an account of judicial virtue is introduced. This includes judicial wisdom, a form of phronesis, or sound practical judgment. A virtue-centered account of justice is defended against the argument that theories of fairness are prior to theories of justice. The …
"Sir, Yes, Sir!": The Courts, Congress And Structural Injunctions, Mark V. Tushnet
"Sir, Yes, Sir!": The Courts, Congress And Structural Injunctions, Mark V. Tushnet
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This is a deeply confused book. Not that the authors' stance is unclear: They have seen federal courts in action, and they don't like what they see. Their subject is federal judicial supervision of state and local governments through injunctive decrees. The authors' position wouldn't be confused - or at least would be confused in a different way - if they dealt with injunctive decrees aimed at enforcing what the judges took to be constitutional requirements. In such cases there's at least something coherent that can be said about judges displacing democratic decision-making. Sandler and Schoenbrod, though, don't deal with …
An Incentives Approach To Patent Settlements: A Commentary On Hovenkamp, Janis & Lemley, Maureen A. O'Rourke
An Incentives Approach To Patent Settlements: A Commentary On Hovenkamp, Janis & Lemley, Maureen A. O'Rourke
Faculty Scholarship
Professors Hovenkamp, Janis, and Lemley have attempted to clarify one of the most vexing issues facing antitrust and intellectual property law today: What analytical framework should antitrust authorities and courts use in considering whether patent settlement agreements in infringement cases violate the antitrust laws? The issue is complex because many ostensibly anticompetitive restraints in settlement agreements are perfectly legal if the underlying patent right is valid. Unfortunately, in some cases, the relevant patents are either invalid or not infringed. Thus, the antitrust analysis hinges on resolution of an intellectual property question.
Who Was William Marbury?, David F. Forte
Who Was William Marbury?, David F. Forte
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Of all the disappointed office seekers in American history, only William Marbury has been so honored as to have his portrait hung in the chambers of the United States Supreme Court alongside that of James Madison. The two titular protagonists to the Marbury v. Madison dispute had no idea that their original contretemps would ever find its way to litigation, let alone eventual mythic significance as the foundation stone of judicial review.
Why Theories Of Law Have Little Or Nothing To Do With Judicial Restraint, Philip E. Soper
Why Theories Of Law Have Little Or Nothing To Do With Judicial Restraint, Philip E. Soper
Articles
The question I explore here, stated in its broadest form, is this: What is the connection between theory and practice between academic claims about how judges should decide cases and the actual behavior of judges as revealed in the opinions they write? More particularly, do theories about the nature of law have any implications for the question whether a judge should adopt an "activist" or a "restrained" approach to deciding cases? As you might infer from my title, I defend here what I call "the skeptical thesis" in answer to both the general and particular questions. Judges pay little or …
Augustus Van Wyck (1850-1922), Janet Butler Munch
Augustus Van Wyck (1850-1922), Janet Butler Munch
Publications and Research
Augustus Van Wyck (1850-1922) was a judge and NY gubernatorial candidate.
Robert Anderson Van Wyck (1847-1918), Janet Butler Munch
Robert Anderson Van Wyck (1847-1918), Janet Butler Munch
Publications and Research
Robert Anderson Van Wyck (1847-1918). was a judge and NYC mayor.
Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr. And The Counterrevolution In The Federal Securities Laws, Adam C. Pritchard
Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr. And The Counterrevolution In The Federal Securities Laws, Adam C. Pritchard
Articles
The confirmation of Lewis F. Powell, Jr., to the Supreme Court coincided with a dramatic shift in the Court's approach to securities law. This Article documents Powell's influence in changing the Court's direction in securities law. Powell's influence was the product of his extensive experience with the securities laws as a corporate lawyer, which gave him much greater familiarity with that body of law than his fellow Justices had. That experience also made him skeptical of civil liability, particularly class and derivative actions. Powell's skepticism led him to interpret the securities law in a consistently narrow fashion to reduce liability …
Constitutional Sunsetting?: Justice O'Connor's Closing Comments On Grutter, Vikram David Amar, Evan H. Caminker
Constitutional Sunsetting?: Justice O'Connor's Closing Comments On Grutter, Vikram David Amar, Evan H. Caminker
Articles
Most Supreme Court watchers were unsurprised that Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's vote proved pivotal in resolving the University of Michigan affirmative action cases; indeed, Justice O'Connor has been in the majority in almost every case involving race over the past decade, and was in the majority in each and every one of the 5-4 decisions the Court handed down across a broad range of difficult issues last Term. Some smaller number of observers were unsurprised that Justice O'Connor decided (along with the four Justices who in the past have voted to allow latitude with regard to race-based affirmative action programs) …
The Politics Of Crime And The Threat To Judicial Independence, Jeannine Bell
The Politics Of Crime And The Threat To Judicial Independence, Jeannine Bell
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Proposed Legislation On Judicial Election Campaign Finance, Roy A. Schotland
Proposed Legislation On Judicial Election Campaign Finance, Roy A. Schotland
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In light of the recent extraordinary rise in judicial campaign spending, illustrated in Ohio's 2000 judicial elections (and elsewhere, and in Ohio again in 2002), we must consider improving the Model Code of Judicial Conduct. The 1999 amendments to the Code addressed campaign finance, but did not address two major problems. The first one is the absence of limits on aggregate contributions from law firms; only Texas has such limits. This gap allows large contributions from law firms to go to judges presiding in cases in which those firms participate, circumventing the recusal and disqualification triggers. The second problem is …
Why Judicial Elections Stink, Charles G. Geyh
Why Judicial Elections Stink, Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Those who are concerned about judicial independence and accountability in the United States quite rightly focus their attention on state judicial election campaigns. It is there that the most sustained and successful efforts to threaten judicial tenure in response to isolated, unpopular judicial decisions have occurred; and it is there that escalating campaign spending has created a public perception that judges are influenced by the contributions they receive. Attempts to address these problems have been undermined by four political realities that the author refers to as "the Axiom of 80 ": Eighty percent of the public favors electing their judges; …
The Invention Of Health Law, Maxwell Gregg Bloche
The Invention Of Health Law, Maxwell Gregg Bloche
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
By default, the courts are inventing health law. The law governing the American health system arises from an unruly mix of statutes, regulations, and judge-crafted doctrines conceived, in the main, without medical care in mind. Courts are ill-equipped to put order to this chaos, and until recently they have been disinclined to try. But political gridlock and popular ire over managed care have pushed them into the breach, and the Supreme Court has become a proactive health policy player. How might judges make sense of health law's disparate doctrinal strands? Scholars from diverse ideological starting points have converged toward a …
Law And Judicial Duty, Philip A. Hamburger
Law And Judicial Duty, Philip A. Hamburger
Faculty Scholarship
Two hundred years ago, in Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice Marshall delivered an opinion that has come to dominate modern discussions of constitutional law. Faced with a conflict between an act of Congress and the U.S. Constitution, he explained what today is known as "judicial review." Marshall described judicial review in terms of a particular type of "superior law" and a particular type of "judicial duty." Rather than speak generally about the hierarchy within law, he focused on "written constitutions."
He declared that the U.S. Constitution is "a superior, paramount law" and that if "the constitution is superior to any …
Judicial Mediation And Signaling, Edward J. Brunet
Judicial Mediation And Signaling, Edward J. Brunet
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
John Noonan On Marriage And The Family: Continuity And Change In Doctrine, William J. Wagner
John Noonan On Marriage And The Family: Continuity And Change In Doctrine, William J. Wagner
Scholarly Articles
In support of its critique, this article first analyzes Judge Noonan's general methodological vantage and shows how he proceeds, within that vantage, to formulate general moral norms. Next, it compares Judge Noonan's work with trends in the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court between 1965 and the present to suggest that some of Noonan's assumptions about the longer-term consequences of his own methodology for stability and continuity in moral theology may be unwarranted. Finally, it argues that Noonan is not justified in assuming that adjudicative reasoning, without more, suffices for the formulation of general moral norms, or that transcendent …
Pay No Attention To That Man Behind The Robe: Judicial Elections, The First Amendment, And Judges As Politicians, Michael R. Dimino
Pay No Attention To That Man Behind The Robe: Judicial Elections, The First Amendment, And Judges As Politicians, Michael R. Dimino
Michael R Dimino
The Propriety Of Poetry In Judicial Opinions, Mary Kate Kearney
The Propriety Of Poetry In Judicial Opinions, Mary Kate Kearney
Mary Kate Kearney
No abstract provided.
State Laws And The Independent Judiciary: An Analysis Of The Effects Of The Seventeenth Amendment On The Number Of Supreme Court Cases Holding State Laws Unconstitutional, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
In recent years, the Seventeenth Amendment has been the subject of legal scholarship, congressional hearings and debate, Supreme Court opinions, popular press articles and commentary, state legislative efforts aimed at repeal, and activist repeal movements. To date, the literature on the effects of the Seventeenth Amendment has focused almost exclusively on the effects on the political production of legislation and competition between legislative bodies. Very little attention has been given to the potential adverse effects of the Seventeenth Amendment on the relationship between state legislatures and the federal courts. This Article seeks to fill part of that literature gap, applying …