Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (22)
- University of Michigan Law School (15)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (12)
- The University of Maine (5)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
-
- UIC School of Law (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- 1891-1974 (9)
- Earl Warren (9)
- United States/Supreme Court (9)
- Expedited appeals (5)
- Federalism (4)
-
- Maine justice system (4)
- Constitutional interpretation (3)
- Expedited review (3)
- Administrative discretion (2)
- Article III (2)
- Capital punishment (2)
- Civil rights (2)
- Civil rights/Constitutional history (2)
- Death penalty (2)
- Drug courts (2)
- Enforcement (2)
- Equality (2)
- Patent law (2)
- Standard of review (2)
- Stare decisis (2)
- Supreme Court of Canada (2)
- 3JX docket (1)
- Abrams v. Johnson (1)
- Abstention doctrine (1)
- Acevedo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1)
- Adan v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (1)
- Administration of criminal justice (1)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Adoption of minor children (1)
- Advisory Committee Note (1)
- Publication
-
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (18)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (12)
- Michigan Law Review (7)
- Maine Policy Review (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (4)
-
- UIC Law Review (4)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (4)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (3)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (3)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (1)
- San Diego International Law Journal (1)
- Tennessee Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 82
Full-Text Articles in Law
An Outcomes Analysis Of Scope Of Review Standards, Paul R. Verkuil
An Outcomes Analysis Of Scope Of Review Standards, Paul R. Verkuil
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Medicaid And The Unconstitutional Dimensions Of Prior Authorization, Jagan Nicholas Ranjan
Medicaid And The Unconstitutional Dimensions Of Prior Authorization, Jagan Nicholas Ranjan
Michigan Law Review
The political outcry over prescription drug costs has been one of the most vociferous in recent memory. From tales depicting renegade seniors sneaking cheap prescriptions of Vioxx out of Tijuana across the border, to the promises of reduced prices made by front-runners during the 2000 Presidential election, the calls for lower drug prices have been forceful and demanding. This war for lower-priced pharmaceuticals fought by consumers, interest groups and politicians against the pharmaceutical industry itself has recently developed yet another front. The latest battle is over Medicaid. The new victims are the poor. Presently, federal statutory provisions in the Medicaid …
Towards Tribal Sovereignty And Judicial Efficiency: Ordering The Defenses Of Tribal Sovereign Immunity And Exhaustion Of Tribal Remedies, Kirsten Matoy Carlson
Towards Tribal Sovereignty And Judicial Efficiency: Ordering The Defenses Of Tribal Sovereign Immunity And Exhaustion Of Tribal Remedies, Kirsten Matoy Carlson
Michigan Law Review
In 1985, the Narragansett Indian Tribe ("Tribe") created the Narragansett Indian Wetuornuck Housing Authority ("Authority"). The Authority, which acts on the Tribe's behalf in its housing development and operations, entered into a contract with the Ninigret Development Corporation for the construction of a low-income housing development. After construction began, disputes developed over how to proceed with the construction. When conciliation efforts failed, the Authority cancelled the contract. The Narragansett Tribal Council, the governing body of the Tribe, followed the forum selection clause in the contract and notified the disputants that it would hold a hearing to resolve the dispute. Ninigret …
Business Method Patents And Their Limits: Justifications, History, And The Emergence Of A Claim Construction Jurisprudence, Nicholas A. Smith
Business Method Patents And Their Limits: Justifications, History, And The Emergence Of A Claim Construction Jurisprudence, Nicholas A. Smith
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Scholars, practitioners, and even popular media spilled much ink over business method patents in the late 1990s, eager to discuss the shift in jurisprudence that enabled patent holders to enforce business method patents for the first time. Since that initial period of excitement--during which businesses filed record numbers of applications for business method patents, and numerous articles tracing the doctrinal shift were published--commentators have written little on the topic. Various patent holders, however, have since litigated business method patent claims. During these first few years after judicial endorsement of business method patents, such litigation has focused on the scope of …
Best Mode: A Plea To Repair Or Sacrifice This Broken Requirement Of United States Patent Law, Steven B. Walmsley
Best Mode: A Plea To Repair Or Sacrifice This Broken Requirement Of United States Patent Law, Steven B. Walmsley
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
An inventor's obligation to disclose the best mode of her invention is strong consideration in the U.S. patent bargain, but the courts paradoxically define the scope of that obligation, thus rendering the enforcement of U.S. patents unreasonably unpredictable. If an inventor cannot reasonably foresee the scope of her obligation to disclose invention details, then she is subjected to the costs and risks of either overcompliance or undercompliance with the best mode requirement. The scope of the best mode requirement should either be reliably defined by an en banc ruling of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, or the …
Seeing The Appellate Horizon: Civil Trial Strategy And Standards Of Review In The Eighth Circuit, R. Christopher Lawson
Seeing The Appellate Horizon: Civil Trial Strategy And Standards Of Review In The Eighth Circuit, R. Christopher Lawson
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
An Argument For Reviving The Actual Futility Exception To The Supreme Court's Procedural Default Doctrine, Brent E. Newton
An Argument For Reviving The Actual Futility Exception To The Supreme Court's Procedural Default Doctrine, Brent E. Newton
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
After The Revolution: Being Pragmatic And Functional In Canada's Trial Courts And Courts Of Appeal, William Lahey, Diana Ginn
After The Revolution: Being Pragmatic And Functional In Canada's Trial Courts And Courts Of Appeal, William Lahey, Diana Ginn
Dalhousie Law Journal
In a 1998 decision, Pushpanathan v Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada synthesized and revised the previous jurisprudence on "pragmatic and functional analysis" - the approach used since the late 1980's to determine the appropriate standard of deference in substantive review of administrative decision making. The next year, in Baker v. Canada, the Court expanded the reach of the pragmatic and functional analysis by applying it to the exercise of administrative discretion. This paper examines approximately 275 lower court decisions to determine how courts across Canada are responding to and implementing the doctrinal change initiated by the Supreme Court. Patterns …
Suspecting The States: Supreme Court Review Of State-Court State-Law Judgments, Laura S. Fitzgerald
Suspecting The States: Supreme Court Review Of State-Court State-Law Judgments, Laura S. Fitzgerald
Michigan Law Review
At the Supreme Court these days, it is unfashionable to second-guess states' fealty to federal law without real proof that they are ignoring it. As the Court declared in Alden v. Maine: "We are unwilling to assume the States will refuse to honor the Constitution or obey the binding laws of the United States. The good faith of the States thus provides an important assurance that 'this Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof ... shall be the supreme Law of the Land.'" Accordingly, without proof that a state has "systematic[ally]" …
The Fourth Amendment In The Hallway: Do Tenants Have A Constitutionally Protected Privacy Interest In The Locked Common Areas Of Their Apartment Buildings?, Sean M. Lewis
Michigan Law Review
One afternoon, a police officer spots a man driving a Cadillac through a run·down neighborhood. His interest piqued, the officer decides to follow the vehicle. The Cadillac soon comes to rest in front of an apartment building, and the driver, Jimmy Barrios-Moriera, removes a shopping bag from the trunk and enters the building. The moment Barrios-Moriera disappears within the doorway, the officer sprints after him because he knows that the door to the apartment building will automatically lock when it closes. He manages to catch the door just in time and rushes in. Barrios-Moriera is already halfway up a flight …
How The Supreme Court Delivers Fire And Ice To State Criminal Justice, Ronald F. Wright
How The Supreme Court Delivers Fire And Ice To State Criminal Justice, Ronald F. Wright
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law Of The Case In Nevada: Confusing Relatives, Scott Doney
Law Of The Case In Nevada: Confusing Relatives, Scott Doney
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Subversive Strand Of The Warren Court, Gary Peller
A Subversive Strand Of The Warren Court, Gary Peller
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Causation, Constitutional Principles, And The Jurisprudential Legacy Of The Warren Court, Michelle Adams
Causation, Constitutional Principles, And The Jurisprudential Legacy Of The Warren Court, Michelle Adams
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Remembrance Of Things Past?: Reflections On The Warren Court And The Struggle For Civil Rights, Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr.
A Remembrance Of Things Past?: Reflections On The Warren Court And The Struggle For Civil Rights, Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr.
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Intersection And Divergence: Some Reflections On The Warren Court, Civil Rights, And The First Amendment, Lillian R. Bevier
Intersection And Divergence: Some Reflections On The Warren Court, Civil Rights, And The First Amendment, Lillian R. Bevier
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Law And Culture-Shift: Race And The Warren Court Legacy, John O. Calmore
The Law And Culture-Shift: Race And The Warren Court Legacy, John O. Calmore
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Come Back To The Nickel And Five:* Tracing The Warren Court's Pursuit Of Equal Justice Under Law, Jim Chen
Come Back To The Nickel And Five:* Tracing The Warren Court's Pursuit Of Equal Justice Under Law, Jim Chen
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Warren Court, Criminal Procedure Reform, And Retributive Punishment, Darryl K. Brown
The Warren Court, Criminal Procedure Reform, And Retributive Punishment, Darryl K. Brown
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Irreparability Resurrected?: Does A Recalibrated Irreparable Injury Rule Threaten The Warren Court's Establishment Clause Legacy?, Doug Rendleman
Irreparability Resurrected?: Does A Recalibrated Irreparable Injury Rule Threaten The Warren Court's Establishment Clause Legacy?, Doug Rendleman
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proposed Amendments To Fed. R. Crim. P. 26: An Exchange: Remote Testimony - A Prosecutor's Perspective, Lynn Helland
Proposed Amendments To Fed. R. Crim. P. 26: An Exchange: Remote Testimony - A Prosecutor's Perspective, Lynn Helland
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Although the Supreme Court has declined, for now, to endorse the Judicial Conference proposal to add a Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to permit live video testimony under limited circumstances, I agree with Professor Friedman that the matter is far from over. This is both because the potential benefits to be realized from the use of remote video testimony are too large to ignore and because, on closer inspection, any Confrontation Clause concerns that might underlie the Court's hesitation to adopt the proposal are not warranted. My purpose in writing is to summarize some of the …
Judicial Minimalism And The National Dialogue On Immigration: The Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine In Zadvydas V. Davis, Sanford G. Hooper
Judicial Minimalism And The National Dialogue On Immigration: The Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine In Zadvydas V. Davis, Sanford G. Hooper
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marbury Ascendant: The Rehnquist Court And The Power To "Say What The Law Is", Timothy Zick
Marbury Ascendant: The Rehnquist Court And The Power To "Say What The Law Is", Timothy Zick
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Privileges And Immunities Of The International Criminal Court: Are They Sufficient For The Proper Functioning Of The Court Or Is There Still Room For Improvement, Stuart Beresford
San Diego International Law Journal
[T]o determine whether the ICC has the privileges and immunities necessary to ensure the proper functioning of the organization, this Article will first discuss the historical development of privileges and immunities for international organizations, including the legal foundation of the privileges and immunities of the Court. It will then examine the privileges and immunities of the organization as a legal entity, before turning to the privileges and immunities accorded to the various categories of individuals who have to attend the institution in an official capacity. Lastly, because a number of other categories of individuals play an essential role in the …
The Digital Divide And Courtroom Technology: Can David Keep Up With Goliath?, Michael E. Heintz
The Digital Divide And Courtroom Technology: Can David Keep Up With Goliath?, Michael E. Heintz
Federal Communications Law Journal
The federal judiciary recently embraced the technological revolution. Select courts are now equipped with state-of-the-art technology to aid in trial presentations. Before the judiciary made the improvements, litigants had to keep pace with the technological advancements themselves, often at a great cost. One might think that the recent technological improvements made to federal courtrooms would have widened the gap between large and small firms where the available resources are vastly different, but that is not the case. In fact, the installation of new technology into courtrooms serves to equalize what would otherwise be a "digital divide."
Part II of this …
How Is Constitutional Law Made?, Tracey E. George, Robert J. Pushaw Jr.
How Is Constitutional Law Made?, Tracey E. George, Robert J. Pushaw Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Bismarck famously remarked: "Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made." This witticism applies with peculiar force to constitutional law. Judges and commentators examine the sausage (the Supreme Court's doctrine), but ignore the messy details of its production. Maxwell Stearns has demonstrated, with brilliant originality, that the Court fashions constitutional law through process-based rules of decision such as outcome voting, stare decisis, and justiciability. Employing "social choice" economic theory, Professor Stearns argues that the Court, like all multimember decisionmaking bodies, strives to formulate rules that promote both rationality and fairness (p. 4). Viewed through the lens …
Preface: Expedited Appeals In Selected State Appellate Courts, Coleen M. Barger
Preface: Expedited Appeals In Selected State Appellate Courts, Coleen M. Barger
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
New Hampshire's Three-Judge Expedited Docket, Joseph P. Nadeau
New Hampshire's Three-Judge Expedited Docket, Joseph P. Nadeau
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Appellate Mediation In New Mexico: An Evaluation, Roger A. Hanson, Richard Becker
Appellate Mediation In New Mexico: An Evaluation, Roger A. Hanson, Richard Becker
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Objective Analysis Of Advocacy Preferences And Prevalent Mythologies In One California Appellate Court, Charles A. Bird, Webster Burke Kinnaird
Objective Analysis Of Advocacy Preferences And Prevalent Mythologies In One California Appellate Court, Charles A. Bird, Webster Burke Kinnaird
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.