Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2001

State and Local Government Law

Ohio

Articles 1 - 13 of 13

Full-Text Articles in Law

Appeal No. 0774: Stonebridge Operating Co. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Jun 2001

Appeal No. 0774: Stonebridge Operating Co. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2006-98 & 2006-121

Go to article

Appeal No. 0687: Sandbar Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Mar 2001

Appeal No. 0687: Sandbar Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2000-51 & 2000-52

Go to article

Appeal No. 0688: Sandbar Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Mar 2001

Appeal No. 0688: Sandbar Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2000-51 & 2000-52

Go to article

Appeal No. 0697: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Mar 2001

Appeal No. 0697: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2000-153

Go to article

Appeal No. 0685: G-R Contracting, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Mar 2001

Appeal No. 0685: G-R Contracting, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 3000-22

Go to article

Appeal No. 0698: Bt Energy Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Mar 2001

Appeal No. 0698: Bt Energy Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2000-154

Go to article

Appeal No. 0692: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Jan 2001

Appeal No. 0692: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Letter, re: Han No. 1

Go to article

Appeal No. 0691: B T Energy Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Jan 2001

Appeal No. 0691: B T Energy Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2000-88 & Chief's Order 2000-90

Go to article

Appeal No. 0696: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Jan 2001

Appeal No. 0696: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2000-125

Go to article

Appeal No. 0690: B T Energy Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Jan 2001

Appeal No. 0690: B T Energy Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2000-88 & Chief's Order 2000-90

Go to article

Appeal No. 0673: H & D Drilling V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Jan 2001

Appeal No. 0673: H & D Drilling V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 99-115 & 99-116

Go to article

Appeal No. 0672: H & D Drilling V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Jan 2001

Appeal No. 0672: H & D Drilling V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 99-115 & 99-116

Go to article

Maintaining The Status Quo: Electricity Utility Deregulation Difficulties In Ohio , Todd A. Snitchler Jan 2001

Maintaining The Status Quo: Electricity Utility Deregulation Difficulties In Ohio , Todd A. Snitchler

Cleveland State Law Review

In this Article, I seek to review the state of affairs under the Ohio deregulation plan by identifying first the present circumstances in the Ohio electricity utility marketplace and second options that other states, which have not yet deregulated, should consider in developing their plans. In Part I, I examine the current state of electricity utilities in Ohio and the pressures on the legislature that led to calls for deregulation. In Part II, I briefly consider the existing regulatory framework on the state and federal levels. In Part III, I analyze the Ohio deregulation plan with a focus on whether …

Go to article