Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Capital punishment sentencing (36)
- Miranda v. Arizona (10)
- Dickerson v. United States (9)
- Fifth Amendment (7)
- Police (6)
-
- Custodial interrogation (5)
- Due Process Clause (5)
- African Americans (4)
- Capital punishment of offenders with mental disabilities (4)
- Discrimination (4)
- Confession (3)
- Kamisar (Yale) (3)
- Michigan v. Tucker (3)
- New York v. Quarles (3)
- Police interrogation (3)
- Race and law (3)
- Racial profiling (3)
- Racism (3)
- Self-Incrimination Clause (3)
- Canada (2)
- City of Boerne v. Flores (2)
- Compulsion (2)
- Due process (2)
- Edwards v. Arizona (2)
- Empirical studies (2)
- Exclusionary rule (2)
- False confession (2)
- Harris v. New York (2)
- Interrogation (2)
- Mandatory sentences (2)
- Publication
-
- Capital Defense Journal (39)
- Michigan Law Review (12)
- UIC Law Review (5)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (4)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (3)
-
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (3)
- Human Rights Brief (2)
- Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal (1)
- Buffalo Women's Law Journal (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest (1)
- Richmond Public Interest Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 74
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Pathological Politics Of Criminal Law, William J. Stuntz
The Pathological Politics Of Criminal Law, William J. Stuntz
Michigan Law Review
Substantive criminal law defines the conduct that the state punishes. Or does it? If the answer is yes, it should be possible, by reading criminal codes (perhaps with a few case annotations thrown in), to tell what conduct will land you in prison. Most discussions of criminal law, whether in law reviews, law school classrooms, or the popular press, proceed on the premise that the answer is yes. Law reform movements regularly seek to broaden or narrow the scope of some set of criminal liability rules, always on the assumption that by doing so they will broaden or narrow the …
The Limits Of Localism, Richard C. Schragger
The Limits Of Localism, Richard C. Schragger
Michigan Law Review
In Chicago v. Morales, the Supreme Court struck down Chicago's Gang Congregation Ordinance, which barred "criminal street gang members from loitering with one another or with other persons in any public place." The stated purpose of the ordinance was to wrest control of public areas from gang members who, simply by their presence, intimidated the public and established control over identifiable areas of the city, namely certain inner-city streets, sidewalks, and corners. The ordinance required that police officers determine whether at least one of two or more persons present in a public place were members of a criminal street gang …
Capital Punishment: 21st Century Lynching, Serena L. Hargrove
Capital Punishment: 21st Century Lynching, Serena L. Hargrove
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mandatory Minimum Sentences Coupled With Multi-Facet Interventions: An Effective Response To Domestic Violence, Angela M. Killian
Mandatory Minimum Sentences Coupled With Multi-Facet Interventions: An Effective Response To Domestic Violence, Angela M. Killian
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Discrimination And Drug Policy In Excessive Incarceration In The United States, Steven J. Boretos
The Role Of Discrimination And Drug Policy In Excessive Incarceration In The United States, Steven J. Boretos
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cuffed Love: Do Prison Babies Ever Smile?, Leda M. Pojman
Cuffed Love: Do Prison Babies Ever Smile?, Leda M. Pojman
Buffalo Women's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Claim For Third Party Standing In America's Prisons, N. Jeremi Duru
A Claim For Third Party Standing In America's Prisons, N. Jeremi Duru
Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal
No abstract provided.
In Re Braxton 258 F.3d 250 (4th Cir. 2001)
In Re Braxton 258 F.3d 250 (4th Cir. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Shafer V. South Carolina 121 S. Ct. 1263 (2001)
Shafer V. South Carolina 121 S. Ct. 1263 (2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Green V. Commonwealth 546 S.E.2d 446 (Va. 2001)
Green V. Commonwealth 546 S.E.2d 446 (Va. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Patterson V. Commonwealth 551 S.E. 2d 332 (Va. 2001) Zirkle V. Commonwealth 551 S.E.2d 601 (Va. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Schmitt V. Commonwealth 547 S.E.2d 186 (Va. 200[ 1])
Schmitt V. Commonwealth 547 S.E.2d 186 (Va. 200[ 1])
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Yarbrough V. Commonwealth 551 S.E.2d 306 (Va. 2001)
Yarbrough V. Commonwealth 551 S.E.2d 306 (Va. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Inconsistencies In Virginia Capital Jurisprudence, Sarah M. Braugh
Inconsistencies In Virginia Capital Jurisprudence, Sarah M. Braugh
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Consular Assistance For Foreign Defendants: Avoiding Default And Fortifying A Defense, Amanda E. Burks
Consular Assistance For Foreign Defendants: Avoiding Default And Fortifying A Defense, Amanda E. Burks
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
The Lawyer's Role When The Defendant Seeks Death, Ross E. Eisenberg
The Lawyer's Role When The Defendant Seeks Death, Ross E. Eisenberg
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Duncan V. Walker 121 S. Ct. 2120 (2001)
Penry V. Johnson 121 S. Ct. 1910 (2001)
Rose V. Lee 252 F.3d 676 (4th Cir. 2001)
Rose V. Lee 252 F.3d 676 (4th Cir. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
United States V. Boone 245 F.3d 352 (4th Cir. 2001)
United States V. Boone 245 F.3d 352 (4th Cir. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Beck V. Angelone 261 F.3d 377 (4th Cir. 2001)
Beck V. Angelone 261 F.3d 377 (4th Cir. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Burlile V. Commonwealth 544 S.E.2d 360 (Va. 2001)
Burlile V. Commonwealth 544 S.E.2d 360 (Va. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Bums V. Commonwealth 541 S.E.2d 872 (Va. 2001)
Bums V. Commonwealth 541 S.E.2d 872 (Va. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Lenz V. Commonwealth 544 S.E.2d 299 (Va. 2001) Remington V. Commonwealth 551 S.E.2d 620 (Va. 2001)
Lenz V. Commonwealth 544 S.E.2d 299 (Va. 2001) Remington V. Commonwealth 551 S.E.2d 620 (Va. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Powell V. Commonwealth 552 S.E.2d 344 (Va. 2001)
Powell V. Commonwealth 552 S.E.2d 344 (Va. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Gregory V. Commonwealth No. 1671-99-2, 2001 Wl 242227, At *1 (Va. Ct. App. March 13, 2001)
Gregory V. Commonwealth No. 1671-99-2, 2001 Wl 242227, At *1 (Va. Ct. App. March 13, 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Smith V. Commonwealth 542 S.E.2d 803 (Va. Ct. App. 2001)
Smith V. Commonwealth 542 S.E.2d 803 (Va. Ct. App. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Va. Code Ann. S 19.2-270.4:1 (Michie Supp. 2001) Va. Code Ann. Ss 19.2-237.1 To 19.2-237.6 (Michie Supp. 2001)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Tyler V. Cain 121 S. Ct. 2478 (2001)
Virginia Capital Case Clearinghouse Verdict Forms, Second Edition
Virginia Capital Case Clearinghouse Verdict Forms, Second Edition
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.