Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Law (2)
- American legal philosophy (1)
- Atonement (1)
- Cities (1)
- Deborah Post (1)
-
- Environmentalists (1)
- Faculty of color (1)
- Female (1)
- Forgiveness (1)
- Gore (1)
- Jewish law (1)
- Jewish legal philosophy (1)
- Law faculty of color (1)
- Law school (1)
- Levine (1)
- Loss of population (1)
- Marina Angel (1)
- Michael Lewyn (1)
- Minority law professor (1)
- Post (1)
- Professor Garvey (1)
- Professor Stephen Garvey (1)
- Punishment (1)
- Race (1)
- Remorse (1)
- SALT (1)
- Samuel Levine (1)
- Stephen Garvey (1)
- Suburban Sprawl: Not Just An Environmental Issue (1)
- Tenure (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Salience Of Race, Deborah W. Post
Seeing Through "The Glass Ceiling": A Response To Professor Angel, Dan Subotnik
Seeing Through "The Glass Ceiling": A Response To Professor Angel, Dan Subotnik
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Teshuva: A Look At Repentance, Forgiveness And Atonement In Jewish Law And Philosophy And American Legal Thought, Samuel J. Levine
Teshuva: A Look At Repentance, Forgiveness And Atonement In Jewish Law And Philosophy And American Legal Thought, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
Professor Levine examines the atonement model and its relevance to American law. He outlines and explains the necessary steps by the wrongdoer for atonement: repentance, apology, reparation and penance. The wronged party then has the obligation of reconciliation for the process to be complete. Despite the prominent position it has held for millennia in religious thinking, the atonement model is relatively new to American legal theory. Professor Stephen Garvey's attempt to offer a systematic depiction and analysis of the process of atonement and its possible relevance to American law appears to represent the most extensive effort to date. Any application …
Suburban Sprawl: Not Just An Environmental Issue, Michael Lewyn
Suburban Sprawl: Not Just An Environmental Issue, Michael Lewyn
Scholarly Works
Many conservatives believe that (1) sprawl is merely the result of the free market at work; (2) even if sprawl has negative effects, it cannot be limited without implementation of the liberal/environmentalist agenda of larger and more intrusive government; therefore, (3) conservatives should do nothing to fight sprawl. This article rejects all three propositions. Specifically, I argue that: (1) sprawl is in large part a result of runaway statism rather than the free market; (2) sprawl threatens conservative values such as consumer choice, the work ethic, and social stability, and (3) free-market, anti-spending solutions can limit sprawl and revitalize cities.