Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Allen Chair Symposium (3)
- Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. (2)
- Desnick v. American Broadcasting Cos. (2)
- Dietemann v. Time Inc. (2)
- Sanders v. American Broadcasting Cos. (2)
-
- Shulman v. Group W Productions Inc. (2)
- AIDS (1)
- Aggressive Newsgathering and the First Amendment (1)
- Barnes v. Glen Theatre (1)
- Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth (1)
- Branzburg v. Hayes (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Buckley v. Valeo (1)
- Food Lion Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC Inc. (1)
- Frisby v. Schultz (1)
- Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada (1)
- Gertz v. Robert Welch Inc. (1)
- Griswold v. Connecticut (1)
- HIV (1)
- Herbert v. Land (1)
- Houchins v. KQED (1)
- Hustler (1)
- I Spy: The Newsgatherer Under Cover (1)
- Index (1)
- Jury Trials and First Amendment Values in "Cyber World" (1)
- Le Mistral (1)
- Le Mistral Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System (1)
- Le Monde (1)
- Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart (1)
- New York Daily News (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Protect The Press: A First Amendment Standard For Safeguarding Aggressive Newsgathering, Erwin Chemerinsky
Protect The Press: A First Amendment Standard For Safeguarding Aggressive Newsgathering, Erwin Chemerinsky
University of Richmond Law Review
Few occu.pations or professions rank lower than reporters in public esteem. In July 1999, Justice Stephen Breyer participated as a panelist at the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference and was challenged by Associated Press reporter Linda Deutsch about the absence of cameras in the Supreme Court. Justice Breyer explained that the Court did not want to risk its relatively high level of public esteem by placing itself on television. Justice Breyer noted the lack of respect for the media and said that the Court did not want to see its esteem ratings lowered to that of the press.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword, L. Katherine Murray
Foreword, L. Katherine Murray
University of Richmond Law Review
The University ofRichmond Law Review is pleased to present the seventh annual Allen ChairSymposium issue. Through the generous support of the friends and family of George E. Allen, the annual symposium series provides a forum for discussion of legal issues of national and international significance. This issue ofthe Law Review is the literary complement to the symposium presentations.
Privacy And Celebrity: An Essay On The Nationalization Of Intimacy, Robert F. Nagel
Privacy And Celebrity: An Essay On The Nationalization Of Intimacy, Robert F. Nagel
University of Richmond Law Review
I start from the rather obvious proposition that in recent years the American public has placed a high value on the right of privacy. This general commitment to privacy was what kept Robert Bork, despite his qualifications, off the Supreme Court, and more recently it was what kept William Clinton, despite his behavior, in the White House. Bork's nomination was a threat to the constitutional right to use contraceptives and to choose abortion, while the impeachment charges against Clinton were a threat to the moral distinction between public political life and private sexual behavior. The power that the idea of …
Ride-Alongs, Paparazzi, And Other Media Threats To Privacy, Robert M. O'Neil
Ride-Alongs, Paparazzi, And Other Media Threats To Privacy, Robert M. O'Neil
University of Richmond Law Review
When the Supreme Court first addressed the status of "ride- alongs" in late May of this year, the role of the news media could have been treated in any of several ways. The law enforcement officers, who were sued for invasion of privacy because they invited reporters to accompany them while serving an arrest warrant in a private home, offered several extenuations. The presence of journalists, they argued, would provide direct information to the general public about important news events. Moreover, reporters who took part in the arrest could, in a sense, keep the police honest, or at least make …
Qualified Intimacy, Celebrity, And The Case For A Newsgathering Privilege, Rodney A. Smolla
Qualified Intimacy, Celebrity, And The Case For A Newsgathering Privilege, Rodney A. Smolla
University of Richmond Law Review
In this symposium issue Robert Nagel, Diane Zimmerman, Robert O'Neil, and Erwin Chemerinsky explore the intersection of privacy and freedom of the press. In his fascinating inquiry into privacy and celebrity in modern American life, Robert Nagel demonstrates the connection between the American public's strong commitment to privacy and its simultaneous passion for robust protection of freedom of speech. Among his most important insights is the exposure of "pseudo-intimacy" as a principal currency of contemporary celebrity status. Diane Zimmerman, Robert O'Neil, and Erwin Chemerinsky all investigate the legal principles that ought to surround aggressive and surreptitious newsgathering techniques, each in …
I Spy: The Newsgatherer Under Cover, Diane Leenheer Zimmerman
I Spy: The Newsgatherer Under Cover, Diane Leenheer Zimmerman
University of Richmond Law Review
Hysteria about the press, like the flu, breaks out periodically, and when it does, few of us are better off for having lived through the experience. We are currently on what I sincerely hope will prove to be the receding edge of the latest epidemic ofpublic outrage about the press, and, as usual, the frenzied state has not brought out the best in either the media or its critics.
What Passes For Policy And Proof In First Amendment Litigation?, Rodney A. Smolla
What Passes For Policy And Proof In First Amendment Litigation?, Rodney A. Smolla
University of Richmond Law Review
In this Allen Chair Symposium issue of the University of Richmond Law Review, three outstanding scholars have written provocative pieces on the First Amendment. Professor John Nowak engages in an exercise of constitutional futurism, "'remembering the future" to propose a number of relatively radical alterations of First Amendment doctrine to achieve what he argues should be the appropriate balance between freedom of speech and fair trials in "cyber world." Professor Paul Carrington, arguing that a communitarian right of citizens to self-government is the principal that ought to animate our politics and law, has launched a broadside indictment against contemporary First …
Our Imperial First Amendment, Paul D. Carrington
Our Imperial First Amendment, Paul D. Carrington
University of Richmond Law Review
I come to the First Amendment not as a member of the cogno- scenti, but as an observer of the secondary effects on judicial institutions of some interpretations of the Amendment made over the last thirty-five years or so. I deplore those specific effects and I will be direct in saying so. But in considering them, I have been struck by the extent of the federal courts' progress in subordinating to their own governance a wide range of other issues of great concern to citizens, all in the name of the First Amendment, a text intended to foster democratic institutions.