Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Congress (2)
- Commandeering (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Day trading (1)
- Empirical studies (1)
-
- Federalism (1)
- Gregory v. Ashcroft (1)
- In Re Silicon Graphics Inc. Securities Litigation (1)
- Individuals (1)
- Intent (1)
- Interstate commerce (1)
- Investors (1)
- Judicial interpretation (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Liberty (1)
- New York v. United States (1)
- Ninth Circuit (1)
- Pleadings (1)
- Preemption (1)
- Printz v. United States (1)
- Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (1)
- Recklessness (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Regulation of securities market (1)
- Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (1)
- Securities fraud (1)
- Securities litigation (1)
- Shareholder (1)
- Sovereign immunity (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Disorderly Conduct: Day Traders And The Ideology Of "Fair And Orderly Markets", Caroline Bradley
Disorderly Conduct: Day Traders And The Ideology Of "Fair And Orderly Markets", Caroline Bradley
Articles
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Federalism, Individual Liberty, And The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act Of 1998, Adam C. Pritchard
Constitutional Federalism, Individual Liberty, And The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act Of 1998, Adam C. Pritchard
Articles
This Article proceeds in four parts. Part I provides background on the historical development of constitutional federalism, the Supreme Court's decisions in this area, and the apparent demise of constitutional limits on federal power. Part II then reviews the Court's revival of constitutional federalism over the last decade. Based on this review, I argue that the Supreme Court's current federalism doctrine can be understood as a "constrained libertarianism" that attempts to use constitutional structure as a check on government interference with individual liberty. In this model, states are respected in our constitutional system because of the counterbalance that they provide …
In Re Silicon Graphics Inc.: Shareholder Wealth Effects Resulting From The Interpretation Of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act's Pleading Standard, Marilyn F. Johnson, Karen K. Nelson, Adam C. Pritchard
In Re Silicon Graphics Inc.: Shareholder Wealth Effects Resulting From The Interpretation Of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act's Pleading Standard, Marilyn F. Johnson, Karen K. Nelson, Adam C. Pritchard
Articles
This Article presents an empirical study of changes in shareholder wealth resulting from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in In re Silicon Graphics Inc. Securities Litigation, which interpreted the pleading provision established in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Reform Act"). Congress passed the Reform Act as part of an ongoing effort to protect corporations from abusive suits alleging "fraud by hindsight." In such suits, plaintiffs claimed that a sudden drop in a company's stock price was evidence that the issuer and its management covered up the bad news that led to the price drop. …