Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (69)
- William & Mary Law School (28)
- UC Law SF (25)
- Seattle University School of Law (22)
- University of Michigan Law School (18)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (13)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (10)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (8)
- University of the Pacific (7)
- Campbell University School of Law (6)
- UIC School of Law (6)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (6)
- Brigham Young University Law School (5)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (5)
- University of Richmond (5)
- Cleveland State University (4)
- Florida State University College of Law (4)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (4)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- West Virginia University (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (2)
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- United states constitution (49)
- New york state constitution (30)
- Supreme Court (30)
- Article I section 6 (24)
- Fifth amendment (22)
-
- New york constitution (21)
- Appellate Division (19)
- City of Boerne v. Flores (117 S. Ct. 2157 (1997)) (14)
- Constitutional Interpretation (14)
- Reflections on City of Boerne v. Flores Symposium (14)
- Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (14)
- Court of Appeals (13)
- Supreme court (12)
- Due process (11)
- Separation of Powers (11)
- Sixth amendment (11)
- Constitutional law (10)
- First Amendment (10)
- Fourteenth amendment (10)
- Murder (9)
- Equal protection (8)
- Federalism (8)
- Search and Seizure (8)
- Article I section 12 (7)
- Constitutional Law casebooks (7)
- Fourth amendment (7)
- Freedom of Religion (7)
- Right to Counsel (7)
- Third Department (7)
- United States Congress (7)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (69)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (25)
- Seattle University Law Review (22)
- William & Mary Law Review (18)
- Michigan Law Review (12)
-
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (10)
- American University Law Review (9)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (9)
- McGeorge Law Review (7)
- Campbell Law Review (6)
- UIC Law Review (6)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (5)
- University of Richmond Law Review (5)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (4)
- Cleveland State Law Review (4)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (4)
- Florida State University Law Review (4)
- Oklahoma Law Review (4)
- Villanova Law Review (4)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (4)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Buffalo Law Review (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Kentucky Law Journal (3)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (3)
- West Virginia Law Review (3)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2)
Articles 1 - 30 of 271
Full-Text Articles in Law
Suspicionless Drug Testing And Chandler V. Miller: Is The Supreme Court Making The Right Decisions, Ross H. Parr
Suspicionless Drug Testing And Chandler V. Miller: Is The Supreme Court Making The Right Decisions, Ross H. Parr
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
During the last decade, the United States Supreme Court has rendered four major decisions regarding the validity of suspicionless drug testing policies. Such drug testing policies have become a common way for employers and other interested parties-including the government-both to deter the use of drugs and to determine who is acting under the influence of illegal narcotics. Because government officials often randomly select individuals for drug testing, some of these individuals have charged that a governmental drug testing policy violates the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court found this argument unconvincing in three cases decided between 1989 and 1997, but in …
Protecting The Fetus: The Criminalization Of Prenatal Drug Use, Kellam T. Parks
Protecting The Fetus: The Criminalization Of Prenatal Drug Use, Kellam T. Parks
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Lincoln, Vallandingham, And Anti-War Speech In The Civil War, Michael Kent Curtis
Lincoln, Vallandingham, And Anti-War Speech In The Civil War, Michael Kent Curtis
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
In the early morning hours of May 5, 1863, Union soldiers forcibly arrested Clement L. Vallandigham, a prominent Democratic politician and former congressman, for an anti-war speech which he had given a few days earlier in Mount Vernon, Ohio. Vallandigham's arrest ignited debate about freedom of speech in a democracy during a time of war and the First Amendment rights of critics of an administration. This Article is one in a series by Professor Curtis which examines episodes in the history of free speech before and during the Civil War.
In this Article, Professor Curtis explores the First Amendment's guarantee …
State Sales & Use Tax On Internet Transactions, Sandi Owen
State Sales & Use Tax On Internet Transactions, Sandi Owen
Federal Communications Law Journal
The explosive growth of electronic commerce raises serious questions about the viability of the current state sales and use tax system. Sales via the Internet and other electronic means are changing both the form and substance of consumer transactions, and such sales often do not satisfy the traditional nexus requirement for state taxation because on-line vendors frequently lack physical presence in the purchaser’s home state. The inability to collect taxes on this growing segment of the retail sales market will impair states’ efforts to raise revenues and cause economically similar transactions to be treated differently. Consequently, Congress must act pursuant …
Overcoming Overbreadth: Facial Challenges And The Valid Rule Requirement , Marc E. Isserles
Overcoming Overbreadth: Facial Challenges And The Valid Rule Requirement , Marc E. Isserles
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remarks By U.S. Senator Robert C. Byrd The Constitution In Peril, Robert C. Byrd
Remarks By U.S. Senator Robert C. Byrd The Constitution In Peril, Robert C. Byrd
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law And Human Dignity: The Judicial Soul Of Justice Brennan, Stephen J. Wermiel
Law And Human Dignity: The Judicial Soul Of Justice Brennan, Stephen J. Wermiel
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The concept of human dignity has emerged in the United States in recent decades as an important theoretical and sometimes practical source of individual rights and liberties. Human dignity is cited in jurisprudential writings and discussed in some court opinions as a means of enhancing the broad phrases of the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment. This Essay examines the pivotal role that the late Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., played on the United States Supreme Court in making concepts of human dignity a valued and essential part of rights formulation. This essay explores Justice Brennan 's vision of …
Physician-Assisted Suicide: State Legislation Teetering At The Pinnacle Of A Slippery Slope, Eunice Park
Physician-Assisted Suicide: State Legislation Teetering At The Pinnacle Of A Slippery Slope, Eunice Park
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Physician-assisted suicide has become the subject of a hotly contested legal and political debate, both in the United States and abroad. In 1997, the United States Supreme Court rendered two decisions concerning physician-assisted suicide, and two states recently enacted legislation on this issue: Oregon in 1997 and Virginia in 1998. Nevertheless, the legality of physician-assisted suicide remains unclear as doctors, pharmacists, legal commentators, and a growing segment of the general population continue to argue over the line between "letting die" and "killing." This Note analyzes both the constitutional and political aspects of the right-to-die debate, focusing primarily on the political …
An Original Model Of The Independent Counsel Statute, Ken Gormley
An Original Model Of The Independent Counsel Statute, Ken Gormley
Michigan Law Review
On Friday, October 19, 1973, President Richard M. Nixon took a risky step to de-fang the Watergate investigation that had become a "viper in the bosom" of his Presidency. The U.S. Court of Appeals had just directed him to tum over tape-recordings subpoenaed by Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox; these taperecordings might prove or disprove White House involvement in the Watergate cover-up. Rather than challenge this ruling, the President conceived a new plan. The White House would prepare summaries of the nine tape-recordings in question, which would be verified by Senator John Stennis, a seventy-two-year-old Democrat from Mississippi, working alone …
Equal Rights, Special Rights, And The Nature Of Antidiscrimination Law, Peter J. Rubin
Equal Rights, Special Rights, And The Nature Of Antidiscrimination Law, Peter J. Rubin
Michigan Law Review
Despite the continued belief held by most Americans that certain characteristics should not form the basis for adverse decisions about individuals in employment, housing, public accommodations, and the provision of a wide range of governmental and private services and opportunities, antidiscrimination laws have increasingly come under attack on the ground that they provide members of the group against whom discrimination is forbidden with "special rights." The "special rights" objection has been voiced most strongly, but not exclusively, against laws that seek to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. This line of attack has not always been effective, but …
The Treaty Power And American Federalism, Curtis A. Bradley
The Treaty Power And American Federalism, Curtis A. Bradley
Michigan Law Review
For much of this century, American foreign affairs law has assumed that there is a sharp distinction between what is foreign and what is domestic, between what is external and what is internal. This assumption underlies a dual regime of constitutional law, in which federal regulation of foreign affairs is subject to a different, and generally more relaxed, set of constitutional restraints than federal regulation of domestic affairs. In what is perhaps its most famous endorsement of this proposition, the Supreme Court stated in 1936 that "the federal power over external affairs [is] in origin and essential character different from …
The New American Caste System: The Supreme Court And Discrimination Among Civil Rights Plaintiffs, Melissa L. Koehn
The New American Caste System: The Supreme Court And Discrimination Among Civil Rights Plaintiffs, Melissa L. Koehn
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Fifteen percent of the decisions issued by the Supreme Court during its 1996-97 Term centered around section 1983. Section 1983 provides civil rights plaintiffs with a procedural mechanism for vindicating their federally protected rights, including those enshrined in the Constitution. The Court's decisions from its 1996-97 Term reflect a continuation of the alarming trend that has permeated section 1983 for the last two decades-a movement to decrease the scope of section 1983, regardless of the impact on constitutional rights. The Supreme Court appears to be creating a hierarchy both of constitutional rights and of plaintiffs: free speech and takings claims …
Choppy Waters Are Forecast For Academic Free Speech, Rachel E. Fugate
Choppy Waters Are Forecast For Academic Free Speech, Rachel E. Fugate
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rethinking The Clear And Present Danger Test, David R. Dow, R. Scott Shieldes
Rethinking The Clear And Present Danger Test, David R. Dow, R. Scott Shieldes
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The "Dirty Little Secret": Why Class Actions Have Emerged As The Only Viable Option For Women Inmates Attempting To Satisfy The Subjective Prong Of The Eighth Amendment In Suits For Custodial Sexual Abuse, Amy Laderberg
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ultra Vires Takings, Matthew D. Zinn
Ultra Vires Takings, Matthew D. Zinn
Michigan Law Review
When does legislative or administrative regulatory action "go[] too far" and effectively amount to an .appropriation of private property for which the Fifth Amendment requires just compensation? This question has turned out to be one of the thorniest in American constitutional law. The Supreme Court has identified several circumstances in which one can expect to find a regulatory taking, but its numerous pronouncements on the subject give no clear rule to distinguish compensable takings from noncompensable interference with property rights. Notwithstanding its volume, the commentary on the Takings Clause by and large addresses only proper governmental action that rises to …
Rights Against Rules: The Moral Structure Of American Constitutional Law, Matthew D. Adler
Rights Against Rules: The Moral Structure Of American Constitutional Law, Matthew D. Adler
Michigan Law Review
The Bill of Rights, by means of open-ended terms such as "freedom of speech," "equal protection," or "due process," refers to moral criteria, which take on constitutional status by virtue of being thus referenced. We can disagree about whether the proper methodology for judicial application of these criteria is originalist or nonoriginalist. The originalist looks, not to the true content of the moral criteria named by the Constitution, but to the framers' beliefs about that content; the nonoriginalist tries to determine what the criteria truly require, and ignores or gives less weight to the framers' views. Bracketing this disagreement, however, …
The Commerce Clause Meets The Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly, John Copeland Nagle
The Commerce Clause Meets The Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly, John Copeland Nagle
Michigan Law Review
The protagonist in our story has six legs, is one inch long, and dies two weeks after it emerges from the ground. To the untrained eye, the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly looks like, well, a big fly. Entomologists know better. This particular fly can hover like a hummingbird as it uses its long tubular nose to extract nectar from flowers. It can only live in particular fine soils - the Delhi sands - that appear in patches over a forty square mile stretch from Colton to Ontario, California. Today only a few hundred Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Flies survive in less …
The Shifting Preemption Paradigm: Conceptual And Interpretive Issues, Karen A. Jordan
The Shifting Preemption Paradigm: Conceptual And Interpretive Issues, Karen A. Jordan
Vanderbilt Law Review
Recent decisions have signaled a subtle shift away from the Supreme Court's categorical approach to the issue of federal preemption of state law, and toward a preemption continuum in which the implied preemption theories may inform an express preemption analysis. Yet, the Court as a whole has avoided addressing the issues arising from the integration of the doctrines. In this Article, Professor Jordan explores some of these difficult issues. The conceptual issues concern when and how the implied theories should be used in an analysis involving an express preemption clause. She analyzes the Court's recent use of the implied theories …
Trends. Clinton/Lewinsky, Star Chambers, The Starr Report: E Pluribus Unum Or E Uno Plures?, Ibpp Editor
Trends. Clinton/Lewinsky, Star Chambers, The Starr Report: E Pluribus Unum Or E Uno Plures?, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
The author discusses the effect of lying on the presidency and impeachment.
The Supreme Court As An Enforcement Agency, Harold J. Krent
The Supreme Court As An Enforcement Agency, Harold J. Krent
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Scope Of Eleventh Amendment Immunity From Suits Arising Under Patent Law After Seminole Tribe V. Florida , Kristen Healey
The Scope Of Eleventh Amendment Immunity From Suits Arising Under Patent Law After Seminole Tribe V. Florida , Kristen Healey
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Endangered Species Act: Standing To Sue. Bennett V. Spear, 117 S. Ct. 1154 (1997)., R. Margaret Dobson
Endangered Species Act: Standing To Sue. Bennett V. Spear, 117 S. Ct. 1154 (1997)., R. Margaret Dobson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
L'Indépendance Judiciaire Et La Cour Suprême: Reconstruction Historique Douteuse Et Théorie Constitutionnelle De Complaisance, Jean Leclair, Yves-Marie Morissette
L'Indépendance Judiciaire Et La Cour Suprême: Reconstruction Historique Douteuse Et Théorie Constitutionnelle De Complaisance, Jean Leclair, Yves-Marie Morissette
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Reference re: Remuneration of Judges in the Provincial Court of Prince Edward Island has given judicial independence a surprising interpretation. A majority of the Court stated that this principle requires legislative bodies to establish independent procedures for setting judicial salaries. The Court maintained that the basis of judicial independence is to be found in the preamble of the Constitution Act, 1867, rather than the express provisions of the constitutional text. The authors argue in Part I of this article that the Court transformed fundamentally and without reason traditional conceptions …
Seeley V. State: The Need For Definitional Balancing In Washington Substantive Due Process Law, Kristiana L. Farris
Seeley V. State: The Need For Definitional Balancing In Washington Substantive Due Process Law, Kristiana L. Farris
Washington Law Review
Seeley v. State, concerning the medical use of marijuana, underscored yet again the fundamental tensions and flaws in federal substantive due process analysis. The U.S. Supreme Court has increasingly restricted the definition of fundamental rights, leaving many important interests exposed to the highly deferential rational relationship standard for state regulation. Under the bifurcated federal substantive due process test, the initial classification of an individual interest as fundamental or non-fundamental is highly outcome determinative, leading to contorted definitions of individual rights before the test for the validity of a regulation is even applied. Washington has generally followed federal constitutional law …
Constitutional Law, Robin Jean Davis, Louis J. Palmer Jr.
Constitutional Law, Robin Jean Davis, Louis J. Palmer Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Continuing Validity Of Disparate Impact Analysis For Federal-Sector Age Discrimination Claims , Keith R. Fentonmiller
The Continuing Validity Of Disparate Impact Analysis For Federal-Sector Age Discrimination Claims , Keith R. Fentonmiller
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sex-Based Discrimination In U.S. Immigration Law: The High Court's Lost Opportunity To Bridge The Gap Between What We Say And What We Do , Debra L. Satinoff
Sex-Based Discrimination In U.S. Immigration Law: The High Court's Lost Opportunity To Bridge The Gap Between What We Say And What We Do , Debra L. Satinoff
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
From George Carlin To Matt Drudge: The Constitutional Implications Of Bringing The Paparazzi To America , Lyle Denniston
From George Carlin To Matt Drudge: The Constitutional Implications Of Bringing The Paparazzi To America , Lyle Denniston
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Unnecessary Demise Of The Line Item Veto Act: The Clinton Administration's Costly Failure To Seek Acknowledgement Of "National Security Rescission" , Roy E. Brownell_Ii
The Unnecessary Demise Of The Line Item Veto Act: The Clinton Administration's Costly Failure To Seek Acknowledgement Of "National Security Rescission" , Roy E. Brownell_Ii
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.