Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Order Granting Motion For Extension, Harold H. Greene
Order Granting Motion For Extension, Harold H. Greene
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
Plaintiff's Reply To Intervenor-Defendants' Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment, And Plaintiff's Response To Intervenor-Defendants' Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Peter T. Grossi Jr.
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
Plaintiff's Response To Bernalillo County's Proposed Uncontroverted Facts, Peter T. Grossi Jr.
Plaintiff's Response To Bernalillo County's Proposed Uncontroverted Facts, Peter T. Grossi Jr.
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
Bernalillo's County's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Thomas R. Bartman, Carol E. Dinkins
Bernalillo's County's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Thomas R. Bartman, Carol E. Dinkins
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
Defendant-Intervenor Bernalillo County, New Mexico adopts this cross-motion in support of the Federal Defendants' Cross-motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support (filed June 27, 1997). As set out in the Federal Defendants Memorandum in Support, the administrative record demonstrates that Secretary Hodel's decision not to grant the Pueblo's claim was fully supported by the record and was neither arbitrary nor capricious, and that Secretary Babbitt's inaction on the Pueblo's claim does not constitute reviewable final agency action and/or was not arbitrary and capricious.
Intervenor-Defendant Bernalillo County's Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment And In Support Of County's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Thomas R. Bartman, Carol E. Dinkins
Intervenor-Defendant Bernalillo County's Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment And In Support Of County's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Thomas R. Bartman, Carol E. Dinkins
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
Intervenor-defendant Bernalillo County, New Mexico states its opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiff Pueblo of Sandia (filed June 26, 1996) and joins in with and adopts the United States' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (filed June 27, 1997). Further, Defendant Bernalillo County moves the Court to grant it summary judgment on the same grounds on which it opposes Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion.
Plaintiff's Reply To Defendants' Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment, And Plaintiff's Response To Defendants' Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Peter T. Grossi Jr.
Plaintiff's Reply To Defendants' Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment, And Plaintiff's Response To Defendants' Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Peter T. Grossi Jr.
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
Federal Defendants' Statement Of Genuine Issues In Response To Plaintiff's Statement Of Undisputed Facts, Andrew M. Eschen
Federal Defendants' Statement Of Genuine Issues In Response To Plaintiff's Statement Of Undisputed Facts, Andrew M. Eschen
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
Order Granting Motion To Intervene, Harold H. Greene
Order Granting Motion To Intervene, Harold H. Greene
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.
Stipulation For Enlargement Of Time To Answer Complaint, Andrew M. Eschen
Stipulation For Enlargement Of Time To Answer Complaint, Andrew M. Eschen
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
No abstract provided.