Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1997

State and Local Government Law

Seattle University School of Law

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Prosecuting Pregnant Women: Should Washington Take The Next Step?, Amanda E. Vedrich Jan 1997

Prosecuting Pregnant Women: Should Washington Take The Next Step?, Amanda E. Vedrich

Seattle University Law Review

The first section of this Comment will analyze the case against Deborah Zimmerman and the court's reasons for refusing to dismiss the charges against her. The second section will examine current Washington law and why similar charges could not be brought in this state. The third section will look at the policy rationales for changing Washington law to allow charges to be filed against women for attempting to intentionally endanger the life of a viable fetus. This Comment argues that Washington law should be so amended in order to achieve these policy goals.


Every Category Of Provider: Hindsight Is 20/20 Vision, Melanie K. Curtice Jan 1997

Every Category Of Provider: Hindsight Is 20/20 Vision, Melanie K. Curtice

Seattle University Law Review

This Comment contends that if the "Every Category of Provider" statute had been properly limited, as intended and not as interpreted, it would not have met its ultimate fate of ERISA preemption. In order to show how this public interest legislation could remain in effect and provide at least minimal statutory support for consumer choice, an overview of Washington state health care reform, ERISA preemption, and the federal district court decision preempting the statute is necessary. In Part I, this Comment provides a brief history of the "Every Category of Provider" statute and the Bulletin. Part II contains a summary …