Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Society (3)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Sociology (2)
-
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Community Health and Preventive Medicine (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Disability Law (1)
- Disability Studies (1)
- Disability and Equity in Education (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Education (1)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (1)
- Family, Life Course, and Society (1)
- Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (1)
- Gender Equity in Education (1)
- Gender and Sexuality (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Medical Biotechnology (1)
- Medical Genetics (1)
- Medical Sciences (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Keyword
-
- Assisted reproductive technology (1)
- Bioethics (1)
- Disability (1)
- Electronic archives (1)
- Equal protection (1)
-
- Gender discrimination (1)
- Infertility (1)
- Intermediate scrutiny (1)
- Internet (1)
- Law reviews (1)
- Legal publishing (1)
- Multifetal pregnancy reduction (1)
- Personhood (1)
- Prenatal genetic testing (1)
- Reproductive technologies (1)
- Scholarly publishing (1)
- Selective reduction (1)
- Selective termination (1)
- Self-publishing (1)
- Sex discrimination (1)
- Strict scrutiny (1)
- Suspect class (1)
- Women's rights (1)
- World Wide Web (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Helmelt V U.S., Westlaw
Callahan V Aev Inc, Westlaw
Dotson V Us, Westlaw
Pittsburgh Stadium Concessions, Inc. V. Com., Pennsylvania Liquor Control Bd., Westlaw
Pittsburgh Stadium Concessions, Inc. V. Com., Pennsylvania Liquor Control Bd., Westlaw
Cases
No abstract provided.
Red Sky, Inc. V. Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau Of Liquor Control Enforcemnet, Westlaw
Red Sky, Inc. V. Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau Of Liquor Control Enforcemnet, Westlaw
Cases
No abstract provided.
People In The News, The Legal Intelligencer
Sex As A Suspect Class: An Argument For Applying Strict Scrutiny To Gender Discrimination, Deborah Brake
Sex As A Suspect Class: An Argument For Applying Strict Scrutiny To Gender Discrimination, Deborah Brake
Articles
In United States v. Commonwealth of Virginia' ("VMI"), the Supreme Court has a landmark opportunity to revisit the legal standard courts should use to review classifications which treat men and women differently. The VMI case involves an equal protection challenge to the state's exclusion of women from VMI and its establishment of an alternative, sex-stereotyped women's leadership program as a remedy to that exclusion. The United States, which brought the case against VMI, has asked the Supreme Court to rule that sex-based classifications, like classifications based on race, must be subjected to the highest level of constitutional scrutiny, or "strict …
Choice, Conscience, And Context, Mary Crossley
Choice, Conscience, And Context, Mary Crossley
Articles
Building on Professor Michael H. Shapiro's critique of arguments that some uses of new reproductive technologies devalue and use persons inappropriately (which is part of a Symposium on New Reproductive Technologies), this work considers two specific practices that increasingly are becoming part of the new reproductive landscape: selective reduction of multiple pregnancy and prenatal genetic testing to enable selective abortion. Professor Shapiro does not directly address either practice, but each may raise troubling questions that sound suspiciously like the arguments that Professor Shapiro sought to discredit. The concerns that selective reduction and prenatal genetic screening raise, however, relate not to …
Last Writes? Re-Assessing The Law Review In The Age Of Cyberspace, Bernard J. Hibbitts
Last Writes? Re-Assessing The Law Review In The Age Of Cyberspace, Bernard J. Hibbitts
Articles
This article - the original version of which was published on the author’s website in February 1996, possibly making it the first scholarly article posted online by a law professor before print publication - undertakes a comprehensive re-assessment of the law review from the perspective of the present age of cyberspace. In Part I, I investigate the conditions that initially joined to generate the form, showing how the law review emerged in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries as the product of the fortuitous interaction of academic circumstances and improvements in publishing technology. In Part II, I trace the …