Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1996

Labor and Employment Law

Washington Law Review

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Crafting A New Means Of Analysis For Wrongful Discharge Claims Based On Promises In Employee Handbooks, Gabriel S. Rosenthal Oct 1996

Crafting A New Means Of Analysis For Wrongful Discharge Claims Based On Promises In Employee Handbooks, Gabriel S. Rosenthal

Washington Law Review

Over the past twenty years, the concept of employment at will has been eroded through exceptions permitting employees to sue employers for wrongful discharge under various theories. One such theory, implied-in-fact contract, grants employees the ability to sue based on promises made in employee handbooks. Although forty-seven states allow such claims, their legal analyses have been murky and varied. The reasons for this ambiguity are twofold. First, courts still feel compelled by the looming presence of employment at will to base exceptions on traditional theories of contract law. Second, the role of disclaimers has not been precisely defined. This Comment …


"Overpaid" Older Workers And The Age Discrimination In Employment Act, Stacey Crawshaw-Lewis Jul 1996

"Overpaid" Older Workers And The Age Discrimination In Employment Act, Stacey Crawshaw-Lewis

Washington Law Review

Congress passed the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) to prohibit discrimination against older workers. The legislative history of the ADEA shows that Congress recognized that this discrimination most commonly stemmed from inaccurate stereotypes about the older worker. A review of ADEA cases decided between 1984 and 1995 demonstrates the frequent incidence of cases in which older workers allegedly were fired or not hired because of the higher salaries typically earned by these relatively experienced workers. This review also reveals that, applying an unduly mechanical version of the McDonnell Douglas/Burdine test, courts did not effectively identify (1) employment actions purportedly …