Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Safire), Innis Christie Dec 1996

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Safire), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

This is a Union grievance in which it is asserted that the Employer continued to employ a Part-time Mail Service Courier although he refused to become a member of the Union. The Employer has checked off and remitted his dues to the Union. The Union's position is that in continuing to employ him under those circumstances, the Employer is in breach of the Collective Agreement and requests an order that the Employer terminate this employee if he does not become a member.


Faculty Association Of The University Of St Thomas V St Thomas University, Innis Christie Sep 1996

Faculty Association Of The University Of St Thomas V St Thomas University, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Employee grievance alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties for the period July 1, 1994 to June 30, 1997, which counsel agreed governs this matter, in that the University refused to acknowledge that the Grievor was on sick leave for the period in issue. The grievance requested a declaration mat the Grievor was on sick leave for that period. At the start of the hearing the parties agreed that I am properly seized of this matter, that I should remain seized after the issue of this award to deal with all issues arising directly from its application and …


Farris V Merks Farms Ltd, Innis Christie Jun 1996

Farris V Merks Farms Ltd, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Complainant, David Farris, alleges that he was dismissed unjustly by the Employer, Merks Farms Ltd., with whom he had been employed since July 1, 1986, as a truck driver. The Employer, a family owned corporation, which operates a trucking company and a variety of farming operations, employing, in all, about seventy people, responds that he was justly dismissed for incapacity to work due to a bad back, after the exhaustion of his short term disability entitlements. There was little dispute about most of the relevant facts, although there were differences about how much contact the Complainant had maintained with …