Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1996

Criminal Law

Series

Georgetown University Law Center

Articles 1 - 1 of 1

Full-Text Articles in Law

Getting Even: Restitution, Preventive Detention, And The Tort/Crime Distinction, Randy E. Barnett Jan 1996

Getting Even: Restitution, Preventive Detention, And The Tort/Crime Distinction, Randy E. Barnett

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Preventive detention is in conflict with the standard account because it appears to justify the imprisonment of persons who have committed no crime, and who are therefore blameless, on the strength of a prediction that they will commit a crime in the future, thus undermining the legitimating conditions of the criminal law. The same objection can be made against imprisoning an offender longer than he "deserves" to be imprisoned on the basis of his "culpability" for the offense, solely on the ground that he may commit another offense in the future.