Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (50)
- American University Washington College of Law (22)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (13)
- University of Michigan Law School (9)
- Brigham Young University Law School (5)
-
- Mercer University School of Law (5)
- UIC School of Law (5)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (5)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- New York (41)
- Supreme Court (39)
- Federal (36)
- 1994) (35)
- Constitutions (33)
-
- Appellate Division (17)
- Defendant (13)
- § 6 (13)
- L. Ralph Mecham (12)
- Jury (11)
- Violated (11)
- § 1 (11)
- Capital Jury Project (8)
- Equal protection (8)
- N.Y. Constitutional Art. I (7)
- Second Department (7)
- U.S. Constitutional amendment XIV (7)
- § II (7)
- Constitutional (6)
- Federal courts (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- N.Y. Constitutional Article I (6)
- Statutory (6)
- U.S. Constitutional amendment V (6)
- Unconstitutional (6)
- Violation (6)
- Capital punishment (5)
- Court of Appeals (5)
- Due process (5)
- Fifth Amendment (5)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (50)
- American University Law Review (22)
- Indiana Law Journal (13)
- BYU Law Review (5)
- Mercer Law Review (5)
-
- UIC Law Review (5)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (5)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (4)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (3)
- Circles: Buffalo Women's Journal of Law and Social Policy (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Tennessee Law Review (1)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 129
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Foreign Amici Dilemma, Stephen A. Plass
Taking Capital Jurors Seriously, Craig Haney
Taking Capital Jurors Seriously, Craig Haney
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
How Juries Decide Death: The Contributions Of The Capital Jury Project, Valerie P. Hans
How Juries Decide Death: The Contributions Of The Capital Jury Project, Valerie P. Hans
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Should Juries And The Death Penalty Mix?: A Prediction About The Supreme Court's Answer, Christopher Slobogin
Should Juries And The Death Penalty Mix?: A Prediction About The Supreme Court's Answer, Christopher Slobogin
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
The Capital Jury Project: The Role Of Responsibility And How Psychology Can Inform The Law, Steven J. Sherman
The Capital Jury Project: The Role Of Responsibility And How Psychology Can Inform The Law, Steven J. Sherman
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Cross-Overs-Capital Jurors Who Change Their Minds About The Punishment: A Litmus Test For Sentencing Guidelines, Marla Sandys
Cross-Overs-Capital Jurors Who Change Their Minds About The Punishment: A Litmus Test For Sentencing Guidelines, Marla Sandys
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
The Capital Jury Project: Rationale, Design, And Preview Of Early Findings, William J. Bowers
The Capital Jury Project: Rationale, Design, And Preview Of Early Findings, William J. Bowers
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Where's The Buck?: Juror Misperception Of Sentencing Responsibility In Death Penalty Cases, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Where's The Buck?: Juror Misperception Of Sentencing Responsibility In Death Penalty Cases, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Violence, Representation, And Responsibility In Capital Trials: The View From The Jury, Austin Sarat
Violence, Representation, And Responsibility In Capital Trials: The View From The Jury, Austin Sarat
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Discretion In Capital Sentencing Instructions: Guided Or Misguided?, James Luginbuhl, Julie Howe
Discretion In Capital Sentencing Instructions: Guided Or Misguided?, James Luginbuhl, Julie Howe
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: The Capital Jury Project
Clear And Convincing Evidence: The Standard Required To Support Pretrial Detention Of Juveniles Pursuant To D.C. Code Section 16-2310, Julia Colton-Bell, Robert J. Levant
Clear And Convincing Evidence: The Standard Required To Support Pretrial Detention Of Juveniles Pursuant To D.C. Code Section 16-2310, Julia Colton-Bell, Robert J. Levant
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
This Note examines the appropriate evidentiary standard for pretrial detention decisions in Juvenile Court in the District of Columbia. Currently, there is no authority mandating the standard of proof that is to be applied to the pretrial detention of juveniles. To ensure that all juveniles receive the same protections, one evidentiary standard must be applied at all pretrial detention hearings. Based upon adult and juvenile pretrial detention statutes, the case law construing those statutes, and the standard courts employ in adult civil commitment procedures, the appropriate standard is the "clear and convincing evidence" standard of proof. In order to afford …
Pre-Initial Hearing Detention: Are The Police Department And Social Services Intake Following The Law?, Henry A. Escoto
Pre-Initial Hearing Detention: Are The Police Department And Social Services Intake Following The Law?, Henry A. Escoto
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appendix B: February-March, 1995 Court Monitoring Report, University Of The District Of Columbia Law Review
Appendix B: February-March, 1995 Court Monitoring Report, University Of The District Of Columbia Law Review
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substituting Secure Detention For Shelter Care: An Illegal Deprivation Of Liberty, Susan M. Johlie
Substituting Secure Detention For Shelter Care: An Illegal Deprivation Of Liberty, Susan M. Johlie
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Judges sitting on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia routinely order children into secure detention who require no more restrictive confinement than that provided by shelter care. Despite a statutory presumption against detention, and a superior court rule that prohibits substituting secure detention for shelter care,' the District inappropriately places children into secure detention simply because there is a lack of bed space in youth shelter houses. The deprivation of liberty that occurs when a juvenile is placed in secure detention rather than shelter care is required neither for the protection of the community nor for the welfare …
The Sky Is Falling-The Ali's Efficient Response To Courts In Crisis?, Christine Gail Clark
The Sky Is Falling-The Ali's Efficient Response To Courts In Crisis?, Christine Gail Clark
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Power Of Congress Over Courts In N Onfederal Cases, Louise Weinberg
The Power Of Congress Over Courts In N Onfederal Cases, Louise Weinberg
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arthur Miller's Death Of A Doctrine Or Will The Federal Courts Abstain From Abstaining? The Complex Litigation Recommendations' Impact On The Abstention Doctrine, William A. Calhoun Ii
Arthur Miller's Death Of A Doctrine Or Will The Federal Courts Abstain From Abstaining? The Complex Litigation Recommendations' Impact On The Abstention Doctrine, William A. Calhoun Ii
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
History, Jurisdiction, And The Federal Courts: Changing Contexts, Selective Memories, And Limited Imagination, Judith Resnik
History, Jurisdiction, And The Federal Courts: Changing Contexts, Selective Memories, And Limited Imagination, Judith Resnik
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Ali's Complex Litigation Project And Federal-To-State Consolidation: A Due Process Analysis Of Granting To State Courts Nationwide Personal Jurisdiction, Deborah Dunn
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court Cites The Supreme Court: Follow-Up Citation On The Supreme Court Of Canada, 1989-1993, Peter Mccormick
The Supreme Court Cites The Supreme Court: Follow-Up Citation On The Supreme Court Of Canada, 1989-1993, Peter Mccormick
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
Judges do not simply declare outcomes but also give reasons; in Canada, these reasons are typically organized around citations of judicial authority. Each citation acknowledges a contribution to the immediate decision; therefore, a statistical analysis of citation patterns is also a measure of judicial influence. This study considers follow-up citations of the Supreme Court of Canada over a five-year period to assess the influence of past and current members of the Court, developing appropriate discounts for the recency of the citation and for its nature and extent. The sui generis impact of the Charter suggests that these inferences cannot be …
Thinking Clearly About Guilt, Juries, And Jeopardy, Stanton D. Krauss
Thinking Clearly About Guilt, Juries, And Jeopardy, Stanton D. Krauss
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Rethinking Feminist Judging, Michael E. Solimine, Susan E. Wheatley
Rethinking Feminist Judging, Michael E. Solimine, Susan E. Wheatley
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Theory Of Compulsory Process Clause Discovery Rights, Jean Montoya
A Theory Of Compulsory Process Clause Discovery Rights, Jean Montoya
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Fictions, Fault, And Forgiveness: Jury Nullification In A New Context, David N. Dorfman, Chris K. Iijima
Fictions, Fault, And Forgiveness: Jury Nullification In A New Context, David N. Dorfman, Chris K. Iijima
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Recently, critics of the Anglo-American jury system have complained that juries in criminal trials have been ignoring the law, in favor of defendants who claim that they lack criminal responsibility because they are afflicted by the various victimization syndromes now popularized in the mass media. In this Article, Professors Dorfman and Iijima counter this characterization of the "runaway" jury and argue that juries are not ignoring the law, but rather, are exercising a primary power of the jury, to nullify the application of the law when such application to a particular defendant is unjust. The Authors trace the development of …
The Case For Appellate Court Revision, Joseph F. Weis Jr.
The Case For Appellate Court Revision, Joseph F. Weis Jr.
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Rationing Justice on Appeal: The Problems of the U.S. Courts of Appeals by Thomas E. Baker
The Jury: Trial And Error In The American Courtroom, John C. Blattner
The Jury: Trial And Error In The American Courtroom, John C. Blattner
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Jury: Trial and Error in the American Courtroom by Stephen J. Adler
Applying The Break: Religion And The Peremptory Challenge, J. Suzanne Bell Chambers
Applying The Break: Religion And The Peremptory Challenge, J. Suzanne Bell Chambers
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Intramural Reforms: How The U.S. Courts Of Appeals Have Helped Themselves, Thomas E. Baker
Intramural Reforms: How The U.S. Courts Of Appeals Have Helped Themselves, Thomas E. Baker
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Opening The Door To The Grand Jury: Abandoning Secrecy For Secrecy's Sake, George Edward Dazzo
Opening The Door To The Grand Jury: Abandoning Secrecy For Secrecy's Sake, George Edward Dazzo
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
The grand jury in the United States is hailed by its proponents as an indispensable buffer of protection from malicious and unfounded prosecution by the State. Critics, however, liken the investigatory body to a rubber stamp of the prosecutor, analogous to early English grand jurors who were subject to the influences of the Monarch. Criticism of the grand jury often focuses on the grand jury's potential for oppression rather than protection of the individual.' In particular, it is the secrecy of the grand jury that sparks the most debate.'
Unemployment Compensation For Employees Of Educational Institutions: How State Courts Have Created Variations On Federally Mandated Statutory Language, Maribeth Wilt-Seibert
Unemployment Compensation For Employees Of Educational Institutions: How State Courts Have Created Variations On Federally Mandated Statutory Language, Maribeth Wilt-Seibert
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Abstract for a piece in the 1995 Unemployment Compensation: Continuity and Change symposium presented by the Advisory Council on Unemployment Compensation and the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform.