Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Courts (2)
- Attempt (1)
- Causation (1)
- Codes (1)
- Commercial speech (1)
-
- Community values (1)
- Complicity (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminalization (1)
- Culpability (1)
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Excuse (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Futility principle (1)
- Internet (1)
- Justification (1)
- Lay intuitions (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Media (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Public information (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Closing The Barn Door After The Genie Is Out Of The Bag: Recognizing A "Futility Principle" In First Amendment Jurisprudence, Eric Easton
All Faculty Scholarship
This article argues for a simple proposition: the First Amendment imposes a presumption against the suppression of speech when suppression would be futile. Suppression is futile when the speech is available to the same audience through some other medium or at some other place. The government can overcome this presumption of futility only when it asserts an important interest that is unrelated to the content of the speech in question, and only when the suppression directly advances that interest.
In Part I, the article explores the role that this unarticulated "futility principle" has played in Supreme Court and other decisions …
The Creation Of A Usable Judicial Past: Max Lerner, Class Conflict, And The Propagation Of Judicial Titans, Sarah Barringer Gordon
The Creation Of A Usable Judicial Past: Max Lerner, Class Conflict, And The Propagation Of Judicial Titans, Sarah Barringer Gordon
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Beyond Gender: Peremptory Challenges And The Roles Of The Jury, Nancy S. Marder
Beyond Gender: Peremptory Challenges And The Roles Of The Jury, Nancy S. Marder
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Justice, Liability, And Blame: Community Views And The Criminal Law, Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley
Justice, Liability, And Blame: Community Views And The Criminal Law, Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley
All Faculty Scholarship
This book reports empirical studies on 18 different areas of substantive criminal law in which the study results showing ordinary people’s judgments of justice are compared to the governing legal doctrine to highlight points of agreement and disagreement. The book also identifies trends and patterns in agreement and disagreement and discusses the implications for the formulation of criminal law. The chapters include:
Chapter 1. Community Views and the Criminal Law (Introduction; An Overview; Why Community Views Should Matter; Research Methods)
Chapter 2. Doctrines of Criminalization: What Conduct Should Be Criminal? (Objective Requirements of Attempt (Study 1); Creating a Criminal Risk …