Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appellants' Reply Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellee-Plantiff Tribes
Brief Of Appellee-Plantiff Tribes
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Appellants Washington Harvest Divers Association
Reply Brief Of Appellants Washington Harvest Divers Association
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
State's Response Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Plaintiff/Appellee Tribes
Brief Of Plaintiff/Appellee Tribes
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Appellant's Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Appellants
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief For Appellants
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of The Appellee Lummi Indian Nation
Brief Of The Appellee Lummi Indian Nation
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee United States Of America
Brief For Appellee United States Of America
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee Indian Tribes
Brief For Appellee Indian Tribes
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Appellee Lummi Indian Nation Brief
Appellee Lummi Indian Nation Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee State Of Washington
Brief For Appellee State Of Washington
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellants
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
The Sea Of Okhotsk Peanut Hole: How The United Nations Draft Agreement On Straddling Stocks Might Preserve The Pollack Fishery, Jon K. Goltz
The Sea Of Okhotsk Peanut Hole: How The United Nations Draft Agreement On Straddling Stocks Might Preserve The Pollack Fishery, Jon K. Goltz
Washington International Law Journal
The enclave of international waters in the central Sea of Okhotsk, called the "peanut hole," is surrounded by the 200 mile Exclusive Economic Zone ("EEZ") of the Russian Federation. Since 1991, distant water fishing nations ("DWFNs") have been fishing in the peanut hole in a manner that Russia claims is detrimental to the straddling pollack fish stock that exists both in Russia's EEZ and in the enclave. To prevent destruction of the pollack fishery, Russia imposed a moratorium on all fishing in the enclave; the moratorium is not universally observed. The United Nations Conference on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly …