Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1995

Evidence

Mercer Law Review

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Evidence, Marc T. Treadwell Dec 1995

Evidence, Marc T. Treadwell

Mercer Law Review

  1. Objections
  2. Relevancy
  3. Privilege
  4. Witnesses
  5. Opinion Testimony
  6. Hearsay
  7. Authentication


Evidence, Marc T. Treadwell Jul 1995

Evidence, Marc T. Treadwell

Mercer Law Review

In recent past evidence surveys, the author has suggested, perhaps presumptuously, that the Eleventh Circuit has markedly decreased its level of scrutiny of district court evidentiary decisions. It appears that in most cases, the Eleventh Circuit is willing to defer broadly to the discretion afforded district judges in evidentiary rulings. As a result, the number of Eleventh Circuit decisions in which evidentiary issues played a predominant part has decreased. Decisions rendered by the Eleventh Circuit during the current survey period suggest that the court is allocating its resources to evidentiary issues in which appellate guidance is broadly needed rather than …


Hewitt V. Kalish: Qualifying As An "Expert Competent To Testify" Under O.C.G.A Section 9-11-9.1, Richard T. Hills Jul 1995

Hewitt V. Kalish: Qualifying As An "Expert Competent To Testify" Under O.C.G.A Section 9-11-9.1, Richard T. Hills

Mercer Law Review

In Hewett v. Kalish, plaintiff, Hewett, sued Kalish, a podiatrist, for the negligent treatment of her tarsal tunnel syndrome condition. As required by Official Code of Georgia Annotated section 9-11-9.1, plaintiff filed with her complaint the affidavit of an orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Alan D. Davis. The affidavit set forth Dr. Davis' professional credentials, his hospital affiliations, and his curriculum vitae. The relevant portion of the affidavit provided:

I am... competent to testify as an expert on behalf of [plaintiff] in an action for professional malpractice arising out of the diagnosis, care and treatment of [plaintiff] from January 1988 through …