Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Enablement In Biotechnology Cases After In Re Goodman, John C. Todaro
Enablement In Biotechnology Cases After In Re Goodman, John C. Todaro
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Product-By-Process Patent Claims: Majority Of The Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit Forgets Purpose Of The Patent Act, Mark D. Passler
Product-By-Process Patent Claims: Majority Of The Court Of Appeals For The Federal Circuit Forgets Purpose Of The Patent Act, Mark D. Passler
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Environmentally Dependent Inventions And The "On Sale" And "Public Use" Bars Of § 102(B): A Proffered Solution To A Statutory Dichotomy, James A. Jorgensen
Environmentally Dependent Inventions And The "On Sale" And "Public Use" Bars Of § 102(B): A Proffered Solution To A Statutory Dichotomy, James A. Jorgensen
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Commentary: Authority Of The Commissioner Over The Board Of Patent Appeals And Interferences, R. Carl Moy
Commentary: Authority Of The Commissioner Over The Board Of Patent Appeals And Interferences, R. Carl Moy
Faculty Scholarship
On August 3, 1992, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published a notice in the Federal Register requesting public comments on the PTO's appeal procedures. Taken in context, then, the notice can be fairly said to raise the issue whether, under the existing statute, the Board is subservient to the Commissioner. It also raises the broader question of whether such a subservient arrangement is desirable or, alternatively, whether the statute should be modified if necessary to give the Board decisional independence from the Commissioner. This Commentary is directed primarily to this latter point. In summary, it concludes that the …