Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (6)
- Constitution (5)
- Standards of review (5)
- Cable (4)
- FCC (4)
-
- Free speech (4)
- Regulation (4)
- Antitrust law (3)
- Competition (3)
- Censorship (2)
- Common carriage (2)
- Freedom of expression (2)
- O'Brien test (2)
- Telecommunications (2)
- "first-to-file" system (1)
- "grace period" provisions (1)
- "must carry" provisions (1)
- "must carry" provisions, cable, Cable Television Consumer and Competition Act of 1992, FCC, First Amendment, free speech, competition, constitution, regulation, standards of review, substantial interest, freedom of religion, antitrust law (1)
- 1984 Cable Franchise Policy & Communications Act (1)
- Amgen v. Chugai (1)
- Attorney General's Commission on Pornography (1)
- Bengoshi (1)
- Benrishi (1)
- Berne Convention (1)
- Biotechnology (1)
- Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (1)
- Cable Television Consumer and Competition Act of 1992 (1)
- Cable, telecommunications, constitution, regulation, First Amendment, common carriage, FCC, 1984 Cable Franchise Policy & Communications Act, free speech, cross-ownership, standards of review, competition, cross-subsidization, information services, O'Brien test, rational basis test, antitrust law (1)
- Censorship, cable, public access, First Amendment, indecency standard, regulation, Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, FCC, freedom of expression, hate speech, constitution, obscenity, equal protection, standards of review (1)
- Child Protection Act of 1984 (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Law
Enablement In Biotechnology Cases After In Re Goodman, John C. Todaro
Enablement In Biotechnology Cases After In Re Goodman, John C. Todaro
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Enforcement Of Intellectual Property Protection Between Mexico And The United States: A Precursor Of Criminal Enforcement For Western Hemispheric Integration?, Bruce Zagaris, Alvaro J. Aguilar
Enforcement Of Intellectual Property Protection Between Mexico And The United States: A Precursor Of Criminal Enforcement For Western Hemispheric Integration?, Bruce Zagaris, Alvaro J. Aguilar
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Holding Producers And Distributors Liable For The Harms Of Sexually Violent Pornography Through Tort Law, Elizabeth K. Fuller
Holding Producers And Distributors Liable For The Harms Of Sexually Violent Pornography Through Tort Law, Elizabeth K. Fuller
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
United States V. Knox: Protecting Children From Sexual Exploitation Through The Federal Child Portonography Laws, Annemarie J. Mazzone
United States V. Knox: Protecting Children From Sexual Exploitation Through The Federal Child Portonography Laws, Annemarie J. Mazzone
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel Iii: Cable Versus The Telephone Companies: Can Telephone Companies Be Constitutionally Barred From Delivering Video Programming? , David E. Bronston, James J. Gilligan, Mark C. Hansen, Joseph A. Post
Panel Iii: Cable Versus The Telephone Companies: Can Telephone Companies Be Constitutionally Barred From Delivering Video Programming? , David E. Bronston, James J. Gilligan, Mark C. Hansen, Joseph A. Post
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of Current Crime Victimization Statutes: A Survey , Debra A. Shields
The Constitutionality Of Current Crime Victimization Statutes: A Survey , Debra A. Shields
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel I: The Changing Landscape Of First Amendment Jurisprudence In Light Of The New Communications And Media Alliances, J. Richard Devlin, Theodore C. Hirt, Andrew A. Merdek
Panel I: The Changing Landscape Of First Amendment Jurisprudence In Light Of The New Communications And Media Alliances, J. Richard Devlin, Theodore C. Hirt, Andrew A. Merdek
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel Ii: Cable Versus Broadcast Tv: The “Must Carry” Provisions Of The Cable Television Consumer And Competition Act Of 1992, Marc Apfelbaum, Gregory Buscarino, Steven J. Hyman, Robert D. Joffe
Panel Ii: Cable Versus Broadcast Tv: The “Must Carry” Provisions Of The Cable Television Consumer And Competition Act Of 1992, Marc Apfelbaum, Gregory Buscarino, Steven J. Hyman, Robert D. Joffe
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel Iv: Censorship Of Cable Television’S Leased And Public Access Channels, Majorie Heins, James N. Horwood, Robert T. Perry, Michael Sitcov
Panel Iv: Censorship Of Cable Television’S Leased And Public Access Channels, Majorie Heins, James N. Horwood, Robert T. Perry, Michael Sitcov
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Japanese Patent Law And The Wipo Patent Law Harmonization Treaty: A Comparative Analysis, Mark S. Cohen
Japanese Patent Law And The Wipo Patent Law Harmonization Treaty: A Comparative Analysis, Mark S. Cohen
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Restricting The Right Of Correspondence In The Prison Context: Thornburgh V. Abbott And Its Progeny, Samuel J. Levine
Restricting The Right Of Correspondence In The Prison Context: Thornburgh V. Abbott And Its Progeny, Samuel J. Levine
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Product Definition, Product Information, And Market Power: Kodak In Perspective, Mark R. Patterson
Product Definition, Product Information, And Market Power: Kodak In Perspective, Mark R. Patterson
Faculty Scholarship
In Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., product information, market costs, market information the United States Supreme Court held that market power sufficient to impose an illegal tying arrangement can, at least in theory, derive from buyers' uncertainty regarding a product's costs and quality. Although commentators disagree on the implications of the Kodak decision, all seem to agree that the opinion's emphasis on product information costs is a departure from previously accepted economic analysis of antitrust law. In this Article, Mark R. Patterson argues that the Kodak decision is, in fact, economically reasonable, incorporating into antitrust law previously …