Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- APA (1)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. Norris (1)
- Bazemore v. Friday (1)
-
- Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital (1)
- Boyd v. United States (1)
- Bradley v. School Board of Richmond (1)
- Brown v. Mississippi (1)
- Chevron USA Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1)
- Civil Rights Act (1)
- Discrimination against disabled persons (1)
- EEOC (1)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1)
- Escobedo v. Illinois (1)
- Florida v. Long (1)
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co. (1)
- Labor unions (1)
- Landgraf v. USI Film Products (1)
- Laws (1)
- Lorance v. AT&T Technologies (1)
- Los Angeles Department of Water & Power v. Manhart (1)
- Mallory v. Hogan (1)
- Mapp v. Ohio (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Mozee v. American Commercial Marine Service Co. (1)
- Patterson v. McLean Credit Union (1)
- Regulations and rules (1)
- Rivers v. Roadway Express (1)
- Stone v. Powell (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Withrow V. Williams And Collateral Review Of Miranda Violations: The Supreme Court Rejects The Rule Of Stone V. Powell Under A Revised View Of Applicable Prudential Concerns, John K. Byrum Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
More than fifty years before ratification of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution, Lord Camden observed: [I]t is very certain, that the law obligeth no man to accuse himself; because the necessary means of compelling self-accusation, falling upon the innocent as well as the guilty, would be both cruel and unjust; and it should seem, that search for evidence is disallowed upon the same principle. There, too, the innocent would be confounded with the guilty. Over one hundred years later, in Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court affirmed this relationship between Fourth and Fifth Amendment liberties, holding that …
The Civil Rights Act Of 1991, Retroactivity, And Continuing Violations: The Effect Of Landgraf V. Usi Film Products And Rivers V. Roadway, Leonard Charles Presberg
The Civil Rights Act Of 1991, Retroactivity, And Continuing Violations: The Effect Of Landgraf V. Usi Film Products And Rivers V. Roadway, Leonard Charles Presberg
University of Richmond Law Review
The Civil Rights Act of 1991 (the Act) made significant changes to the major employment discrimination statutes. In addition to restoring the law that was in effect prior to a number of Supreme Court decisions which eroded the civil rights statutes, the Act also added remedies that were omitted from previous legislation. One important area that was unclear at the time of the Act's passage was the issue of retroactivity. In light of the Act's unclear legislative history, ambiguous statutory language, and seemingly contradictory Supreme Court precedent, the Act's retroactive nature has been widely litigated and discussed.
The Americans With Disabilities Act In The Unionized Workplace, Ann C. Hodges
The Americans With Disabilities Act In The Unionized Workplace, Ann C. Hodges
Law Faculty Publications
This Article explores the issues raised by application of the ADA in the organized employment setting. The Article begins with an overview of the statute and then analyzes its applicability in the unionized workplace. In addition to recommending changes in the statute and regulations to clarify the obligations of employers and unions under the ADA, the Article makes recommendations with respect to judicial interpretation of the statute in three major areas. In Sections III C through E, the Article analyzes the circumstances under which the union should be held liable for discrimination, recommending that courts assess liability based on the …