Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (3)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (2)
- Science and Technology Policy (2)
-
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Agency (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- International Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Taking Fact Analysis Seriously, Bernard Robertson, G. A. Vignaux
Taking Fact Analysis Seriously, Bernard Robertson, G. A. Vignaux
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Analysis of Evidence: How To Do Things with Facts Based on Wigmore's Science of Judicial Proof by Terence Anderson and William Twining
Elitism Vs. Checks And Balances In Communicating Scientific Information To The Public, Arthur Kantrowitz
Elitism Vs. Checks And Balances In Communicating Scientific Information To The Public, Arthur Kantrowitz
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
The "father of the Science Court" describes his objective in proposing the institution as it has come to be known, his efforts to get a major public test of the concept, and insights gained since the initial proposal was made in 1967.
Procedural Choices In Regulatory Science, Sheila Jasanoff
Procedural Choices In Regulatory Science, Sheila Jasanoff
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
This paper compares four approaches to using science in regulatory decision making - one very similar to the Science Court proposal. Professor Jasanoff argues generally that that proposal would be less useful than procedures more sensitive to the distinctive characteristics of regulatory science.
Burdens Of Proof, Jose E. Alvarez
Burdens Of Proof, Jose E. Alvarez
Michigan Journal of International Law
Review of the book Fact-Finding Before International Tribunals edited by Richard B. Lillich
Cornerstones Of The Judicial Process, Jerold H. Israel
Cornerstones Of The Judicial Process, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
Under our federated system of government, each state and the federal government have their own criminal justice processes. The federal system must comply with the constitutional prerequisites set forth in the Bill of Rights, and the state systems must comply with those Bill of Rights' provisions made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment,1 but those constitutional prerequisites allow considerable room for variation from one jurisdiction to another. In many respects, the fifty states and the federal government have used that leeway to produce considerable diversity in their respective criminal justice processes. At the same time, however, one can …