Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1993

Mercer Law Review

Litigation

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Appellate Practice And Procedure, William M. Droze, Cynthia Honssinger Frank Jul 1993

Appellate Practice And Procedure, William M. Droze, Cynthia Honssinger Frank

Mercer Law Review

Appellate practice and procedure in the Eleventh Circuit during 1992, consistent with previous years, has produced a number of interesting cases and is often a reflection of the attitudes of the panel considering the appeal. In one instance, despite lacking appellate jurisdiction due to the absence of a final order, the panel invited the parties to obtain the required certification from the district court in order to perfect the appeal. In another, the panel delivered stinging criticism to the district court for creating a policy that restricted the ability of parties to file summary judgment motions.

The court expanded its …


Trial Practice And Procedure, Steven A. Miller, Kristen K. Duggan Jul 1993

Trial Practice And Procedure, Steven A. Miller, Kristen K. Duggan

Mercer Law Review

This Article surveys the 1992 decisions of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals that have significant impact upon the area of trial practice and procedure.

  • Subject Matter Jurisdiction
  • Personal Jurisdicition
  • Pleading
  • Issues at Trial
  • Judgment
  • Local Rules
  • Sanctions


Farrar V. Hobby: When Moral Victories Will Not Feed The Attorney, Seán W. Conley Jul 1993

Farrar V. Hobby: When Moral Victories Will Not Feed The Attorney, Seán W. Conley

Mercer Law Review

In Farrar v. Hobby, the Supreme Court granted "prevailing party" status, as required by 42 U.S.C § 1988, to those plaintiffs who are awarded only nominal damages. The Court rejected the Fifth Circuit's rationale that an award of nominal damages is a "technical" or "insignificant" victory and insufficient to allow prevailing party status.

Although the Court unanimously found that a party who is awarded nominal damages is a prevailing party, the Court split five to four as to what reasonable attorney fees would be in this case. Writing for the Court, Justice Thomas compared the relief sought to the …