Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Reverse Removal, Joan E. Steinman
Reverse Removal, Joan E. Steinman
All Faculty Scholarship
Over the past several years, the legal community has given a great deal of thought to the problems created by multiparty, multiclaim, multiforum litigation. A flurry of activity and an outpouring of writing have resulted, including proposals for substantial changes in both substantive and procedural law. Congress legislated a number of the recommendations made by the Federal Courts Study Committee when it passed the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990. Additional legislation concerning the handling of complex cases is pending, and further action by Congress over the next several years is probable, in view of the burden that complex litigation imposes …
Explaining One-Way Fee Shifting, Harold J. Krent
Explaining One-Way Fee Shifting, Harold J. Krent
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Fee Shifting Under The Equal Access To Justice Act -- A Qualified Success, Harold J. Krent
Fee Shifting Under The Equal Access To Justice Act -- A Qualified Success, Harold J. Krent
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Of Citizen Suits And Citizen Sunstein (With E. Shenkman), Harold J. Krent
Of Citizen Suits And Citizen Sunstein (With E. Shenkman), Harold J. Krent
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Supplemental Jurisdiction In § 1441 Removed Cases: An Unsurveyed Frontier Of Congress’ Handiwork, Joan E. Steinman
Supplemental Jurisdiction In § 1441 Removed Cases: An Unsurveyed Frontier Of Congress’ Handiwork, Joan E. Steinman
All Faculty Scholarship
Late in 1990, Congress passed a statute that confers on the district courts “supplemental jurisdiction” over a universe of claims that the courts otherwise would, or might, be unable to hear. Essentially, 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) authorizes the courts to exercise jurisdiction over claims that are part of the same case or controversy, under Article III of the Constitution, as a claim within the court's original jurisdiction. It explicitly grants jurisdiction over claims that involve the joinder or intervention of additional parties, thereby authorizing what had been dubbed pendent party jurisdiction and some forms of ancillary jurisdiction. It also codifies …