Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- American press (1)
- Communications industry (1)
- Conservatism (1)
- Cultural relativism (1)
- Equality (1)
-
- First amendment (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Freedom of the press (1)
- Higher Education (1)
- Higher Education--Research (1)
- Humanistic education (1)
- Hutchins Commission Report (1)
- Mass communication (1)
- Political coercion (1)
- Political correctness (1)
- Political principles (1)
- Principle of restraint (1)
- Public affairs (1)
- Religious conviction (1)
- Religious liberty (1)
- San Diego Law Review (1)
- University of Chicago Legal Forum (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Pc Harangue, James Boyle
Why There Should Be An Independent Decennial Commission On The Press, Lee C. Bollinger
Why There Should Be An Independent Decennial Commission On The Press, Lee C. Bollinger
Faculty Scholarship
In 1947, the Commission on Freedom of the Press chaired by Robert M. Hutchins, published its report entitled "A Free and Responsible Press:" Sharply criticized by the media when published, the Hutchins Commission Report (as it has come to be known) seems to have assumed only minor status within the history of freedom of the press in this century, as well as among reports on social problems generally. In this article, I will consider whether the Hutchins Commission Report deserves a different fate. Given the media's usually astounding self-preoccupation, the fact that the Report was about the "press" would lead …
Grounds For Political Judgment: The Status Of Personal Experience And The Autonomy And Generality Of Principles Of Restraint, Kent Greenawalt
Grounds For Political Judgment: The Status Of Personal Experience And The Autonomy And Generality Of Principles Of Restraint, Kent Greenawalt
Faculty Scholarship
This Article addresses three perplexing problems about proposed principles of self-restraint for political decision and advocacy within liberal democracies. It considers the nature of convictions that are based on highly personal experiences and asks what their political status should be. It explores the subtle relationship between proposed principles of restraint and overarching religious and other comprehensive views. It argues that a plausible principle of restraint must appeal to people with various religious and other comprehensive views and must be suited to the particular conditions of a given society.