Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (11)
- University of Colorado Law School (8)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- University of Richmond (6)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (5)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- UIC School of Law (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Mercer University School of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (13)
- 1992) (10)
- Federal (10)
- Constitution (9)
- N.Y. Constitutional Article I (9)
-
- New York State (9)
- Supreme Court (9)
- Court of Appeals (8)
- Defendant (7)
- Judicial selection (6)
- U.S. Const. amend. IV (5)
- § 12 (5)
- Discretion (4)
- Judicial review (4)
- Search & Seizure (4)
- Testimony (4)
- Violated (4)
- § 6 (4)
- Appellate Division (3)
- Constitutional interpretation (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Evidence (3)
- Judge (3)
- Judiciary (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Police (3)
- Trial (3)
- American criminal justice system (2)
- Attorney (2)
- Civil Justice Reform Act (2)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (11)
- Publications (8)
- Law Faculty Publications (6)
- Cardozo Law Review (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
-
- Scholarly Works (5)
- UIC Law Review (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Mercer Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles & Book Chapters (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty and Staff Scholarship (1)
- Horacio M. LYNCH (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Richard L. Aynes (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 84
Full-Text Articles in Law
Rethinking Federal Judicial Selection
Parading Ourselves: Freedom Of Speech At The Feast Of St. Patrick, Larry Yackle
Parading Ourselves: Freedom Of Speech At The Feast Of St. Patrick, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
Three things are true. First, American society is now absorbed in yet another great civil rights movement, this one on behalf of gay, lesbian, and ambisexual citizens, which will lead ineluctably to the elimination of legal burdens on the basis of sexual orientation.' Change will come slowly, with much backing and filling, and at an awful price measured in human pain. Intolerance for the homosexualities that exist among us, and the homosexual behavior in which many of us engage, will persist in quarters where the law cannot reach.2 Yet private homophobia, deprived of legal sanction, will ultimately be discredited and …
Perspective: The Limits Of Judicial Independence, Owen M. Fiss
Perspective: The Limits Of Judicial Independence, Owen M. Fiss
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
No abstract provided.
Motley Is Distinguished Jurist In Residence, Lauren K. Robel
Motley Is Distinguished Jurist In Residence, Lauren K. Robel
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Judge-Jury Communications: Improving Communications And Understanding Bias, Ladoris Hazzard Cordell, Robert Rosenthal, Charles F.C. Ruff, Steven J. Adler
Judge-Jury Communications: Improving Communications And Understanding Bias, Ladoris Hazzard Cordell, Robert Rosenthal, Charles F.C. Ruff, Steven J. Adler
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Improving Communications in the Courtroom
Science And Ethics In Conducting, Analyzing, And Reporting Social Science Research: Implications For Social Scientists, Judges, And Lawyers, Robert Rosenthal, Peter David Blanck
Science And Ethics In Conducting, Analyzing, And Reporting Social Science Research: Implications For Social Scientists, Judges, And Lawyers, Robert Rosenthal, Peter David Blanck
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Improving Communications In The Courtroom Symposium (Welcoming Remarks And Statement Of The Issues), Newton N. Minow, Peter David Blanck
Improving Communications In The Courtroom Symposium (Welcoming Remarks And Statement Of The Issues), Newton N. Minow, Peter David Blanck
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Improving Communications in the Courtroom
Did She Mention My Name?: Citation Of Academic Authority By The Supreme Court Of Canada, 1985-1990, Vaughan Black, Nicholas Richter
Did She Mention My Name?: Citation Of Academic Authority By The Supreme Court Of Canada, 1985-1990, Vaughan Black, Nicholas Richter
Dalhousie Law Journal
Readers of court judgments will have observed that in the course of expressing reasons for the decisions they reach, judges commonly refer to books and articles written by academics. This is not surprising. Many scholarly publications contain information, arguments and opinions pertinent to the choices that judges must make, and lawyers commonly refer to such works in the written and oral arguments they present to courts. We would therefore expect the judges who must assess and respond to such arguments to make mention of that scholarly material. Moreover a certain portion of academic writing-in particular, a preponderance of law review …
The Georgia Jury And Negligence: The View From The Trenches, R. Perry Sentell Jr.
The Georgia Jury And Negligence: The View From The Trenches, R. Perry Sentell Jr.
Scholarly Works
This is the third part of a project devoted to analyzing the Georgia negligence jury. The project employed as its original point of departure the extensive Chicago Jury Study of the 1960s, directed by Chicago Law Professor Harry Kalven, Jr. That Study's immortality derives principally from its famous first premise: Meaningful evaluation of the jury system must originate from within the system itself. That premise propelled Professor Kalven through a massive national survey of trial judges. The judges' responses, under Kalven's insightful analysis, yielded an unprecedented profile of the American jury. In foundational fashion, those responses indelibly etched into legal …
The D.C. Circuit As A National Court, Carl Tobias
The D.C. Circuit As A National Court, Carl Tobias
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Clerks In The Maze, Pierre Schlag
Clerks In The Maze, Pierre Schlag
Michigan Law Review
It must be very difficult to be a judge - particularly an appellate judge. Not only must appellate judges reconcile often incommensurable visions of what law is, what it commands, or what it strives to achieve, but judges must do this largely alone. What little help they have in terms of actual human contact, apart from their clerks, typically takes the form of two or more advocates whose entire raison d'être is to persuade, coax, and manipulate the judge into reaching a predetermined outcome - one which often instantiates or exemplifies only the most tenuous positive connection to the rhetoric …
In Re Grabill Corporation; Appeal Of Ncnb National Bank Of North Carolina: Four To One Against Jury Trials In Bankruptcy Courts, Merritt Mcgarrah
In Re Grabill Corporation; Appeal Of Ncnb National Bank Of North Carolina: Four To One Against Jury Trials In Bankruptcy Courts, Merritt Mcgarrah
Mercer Law Review
In In re Grabill Corporation; Appeal of NCNB National Bank of North Carolina, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals joined the majority of the federal circuits in holding that bankruptcy judges do not have the express or implied authority to conduct jury trials. When the Seventh Amendment grants the right to a jury trial, the district court must conduct the trial.
The Tension Between Rules And Discretion In Family Law: A Report And Reflection, Carl E. Schneider
The Tension Between Rules And Discretion In Family Law: A Report And Reflection, Carl E. Schneider
Articles
The history of law is many things. But one of them is the story of an unremitting struggle between rules and discretion. The tension between these two approaches to legal problems continues to pervade and perplex the law today. Perhaps nowhere is that tension more pronounced and more troubling than in family law. It is probably impossible to practice family law without wrestling with the imponderable choice between rules and discretion. Consider, for example, how many areas of family law are now being fought over in-just those terms. For decades we have lived with an abundantly discretionary way of resolving …
Thomas's Supreme Unfitness--A Letter To The Senate On Advise And Consent, Gary J. Simson
Thomas's Supreme Unfitness--A Letter To The Senate On Advise And Consent, Gary J. Simson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Biography Of The Second Justice Harlan, Louis R. Cohen
A Biography Of The Second Justice Harlan, Louis R. Cohen
Michigan Law Review
A Review of John Marshall: Great Dissenter of the Warren Court by Tinsley E. Yarbrough
Would Vince Lombardi Have Been Right If He Had Said: “When It Comes To Redistricting, Race Isn’T Everything, It’S The Only Thing”?, Bernard Grofman
Would Vince Lombardi Have Been Right If He Had Said: “When It Comes To Redistricting, Race Isn’T Everything, It’S The Only Thing”?, Bernard Grofman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Blackmun, Federalism, And Separation Of Powers, Dan T. Coenen
Justice Blackmun, Federalism, And Separation Of Powers, Dan T. Coenen
Scholarly Works
On June 8, 1970, Harry A. Blackmun took his seat on the Supreme Court bench. Few then foresaw that, in the ensuing twenty-three terms of the Court, Justice Blackmun would make contributions to American law that rank no less than monumental. Justice Blackmun has become best known for his landmark opinion in Roe v. Wade and his increasingly pointed defense of libertarian and egalitarian values. During his long tenure on the Court, however, Justice Blackmun also quietly has shaped the law of constitutional federalism and separation of powers.
This reality first came to my attention in 1987, when I received …
The Myth Of The Impartial Judge, Jane C. Murphy
The Myth Of The Impartial Judge, Jane C. Murphy
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Democracy In The Age Of Television, Theodore Y. Blumoff
Democracy In The Age Of Television, Theodore Y. Blumoff
Mercer Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Ambiguity Of Legal Dreams: A Communitarian Defense Of Judicial Restraint, James A. Gardner
The Ambiguity Of Legal Dreams: A Communitarian Defense Of Judicial Restraint, James A. Gardner
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
New York Law School Reporter, V. 10, No. 4, February 25, 1993, New York Law School
New York Law School Reporter, V. 10, No. 4, February 25, 1993, New York Law School
Student Newspapers
No abstract provided.
Retirement Dinner: Chief U.S. Probation Officer Howard G. Munson, Roger J. Miner '56
Retirement Dinner: Chief U.S. Probation Officer Howard G. Munson, Roger J. Miner '56
Tributes & Testimonials
No abstract provided.
The Impeachment And Removal Of Tennessee Judge West Humphreys: John Bingham's Prologue To The Johnson Impeachment Trial, Richard Aynes
The Impeachment And Removal Of Tennessee Judge West Humphreys: John Bingham's Prologue To The Johnson Impeachment Trial, Richard Aynes
Akron Law Faculty Publications
At the beginning of the Civil War many individuals who held positions under the United States government submitted resignations which, in their minds, allowed them to assume positions with the so-called government of the Confederate States of America. One of the few individuals who did not do so, but nevertheless assumed a position under the Confederate States of America was U.S. District Judge West H. Humphreys. After the Confederacy was formed, he continued to hold court in the same courtroom but under the guise of a Confederate States Judge.
This presented two problems for President Lincoln and the Unionists. First, …
Medición De La Seguridad Jurídica, Horacio M. Lynch
Medición De La Seguridad Jurídica, Horacio M. Lynch
Horacio M. LYNCH
Concurso Asociación de Bancos de la República Argentina (ADEBA).
President Clinton's Covenant And The Federal Courts, Carl W. Tobias
President Clinton's Covenant And The Federal Courts, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
President Bill Clinton has eloquently invoked the concept of a new covenant with the American people. Claiming that the populace elected him with a mandate for change, the President has appointed individuals to high-level positions, particularly in the Cabinet, who have made the new government look like America. In no branch of the federal government are these ideas more apposite than the Third Branch.
The Impeachment And Removal Of Tennessee Judge West Humphreys: John Bingham's Prologue To The Johnson Impeachment Trial, Richard Aynes
The Impeachment And Removal Of Tennessee Judge West Humphreys: John Bingham's Prologue To The Johnson Impeachment Trial, Richard Aynes
Richard L. Aynes
At the beginning of the Civil War many individuals who held positions under the United States government submitted resignations which, in their minds, allowed them to assume positions with the so-called government of the Confederate States of America. One of the few individuals who did not do so, but nevertheless assumed a position under the Confederate States of America was U.S. District Judge West H. Humphreys. After the Confederacy was formed, he continued to hold court in the same courtroom but under the guise of a Confederate States Judge. This presented two problems for President Lincoln and the Unionists. First, …
Jaws Xvi: The Exceptions That Ate Rule 220, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 189 (1993), Charles W. Chapman
Jaws Xvi: The Exceptions That Ate Rule 220, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 189 (1993), Charles W. Chapman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Praetorianism & Common Law In Post-Colonial Settings: Judicial Responses To Constitutional Breakdowns In Pakistan, Tayyab Mahmud
Praetorianism & Common Law In Post-Colonial Settings: Judicial Responses To Constitutional Breakdowns In Pakistan, Tayyab Mahmud
Faculty Articles
The successive constitutional crises that confronted the Pakistani courts were not of their own making. But the doctrinally inconsistent, judicially inappropriate, and politically timid responses fashioned by these courts ultimately undermined constitutional governance. When confronted with the question of the validity and scope of extra constitutional power, the courts vacillated between Hans Kelsen's theory of revolutionary validity, Hugo Grotius's theory of implied mandate, and an expansive construction of the doctrine of state necessity. A more principled and realistic response would have been to declare the validity of extra constitutional regimes a nonjusticiable political question. Besides ensuring doctrinal consistency, a refusal …
In Re Holtzman: Free Speech Or Professional Misconduct?, David W. Wright
In Re Holtzman: Free Speech Or Professional Misconduct?, David W. Wright
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Social Restraint Or Implicit Collusion?: Toward A Game Theoretic Analysis Of Stare Decisis, Erin O'Hara O'Connor
Social Restraint Or Implicit Collusion?: Toward A Game Theoretic Analysis Of Stare Decisis, Erin O'Hara O'Connor
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.