Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
1992 Virginia Legislative Summary, Editors Of The William & Mary Environmental Law And Policy Review
1992 Virginia Legislative Summary, Editors Of The William & Mary Environmental Law And Policy Review
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review
The following are synopses of forty-four pieces of important legislation concerning Virginia's natural environment that the General Assembly enacted and the Governor signed into law in 1992, as of April 6, 1992.
A Decade's Experience In Implementing A Land-Use Environmental Impact Assessment System In Israel In View Of The American And European Experience, Ruth Rotenberg, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
A Decade's Experience In Implementing A Land-Use Environmental Impact Assessment System In Israel In View Of The American And European Experience, Ruth Rotenberg, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Books, Reports, and Studies
ii, 38 p. ; 28 cm
The Natural Resources Law Center: Our First Decade: Informing Natural Resources Decisions, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
The Natural Resources Law Center: Our First Decade: Informing Natural Resources Decisions, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Books, Reports, and Studies
[20] p. : ill. ; 28 cm
Environmental Reforms In Post-Communist Central Europe: From High Hopes To Hard Reality, David Hunter, Margaret Bowman
Environmental Reforms In Post-Communist Central Europe: From High Hopes To Hard Reality, David Hunter, Margaret Bowman
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Capital Punishment: A Critique Of The Political And Philosophical Thought Supporting The Justices' Positions., Samuel J.M. Donnelly
Capital Punishment: A Critique Of The Political And Philosophical Thought Supporting The Justices' Positions., Samuel J.M. Donnelly
St. Mary's Law Journal
Since Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court has developed what could be described as a subparadigm for capital punishment. This subparadigm is now at a point of crisis for two enduring and mutually supporting reasons. The dissents by Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall represent the convergence of the better modern thought in regard to capital punishment. Even with the retirement of both Justices, the criticism found in their dissenting opinions presents a continuing challenge to the plurality’s position. Those using the plurality’s rhetoric are now split into two groups. Justices Blackmun and Stevens regularly vote against capital punishment, while focusing …