Law Commons^™

How The Proxy Rules Discourage Constructive Engagement: Regulatory Barriers To Electing A Minority Of Directors, Ronald J. Gilson, Lilli A. Gordon, John Pound

Faculty Scholarship

During the 1980s, both sides of the hostile takeover controversy viewed proxy contests in terms that bordered on the mythical. Those made uneasy by the takeover phenomenon, especially management, held out proxy contests as an alternative, almost utopian mechanism through which a civilized debate about corporate strategy and structure could be held. As the Delaware Supreme Court put it, "[if the stockholders are displeased with the actions of their elected representatives [in blocking a hostile takeover], the powers of corporate democracy are at their disposal to turn the board out.” In contrast, those who believed that takeovers were necessary to …