Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Educational malpractice (4)
- Proximate cause (4)
- Administrative remedies (2)
- Basic educational skill instruction (2)
- Contract (2)
-
- Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment (2)
- Due process rights (2)
- Duty (2)
- Duty of care (2)
- Educational policy making (2)
- Failure to provide basic educational skills (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Malpractice claims (2)
- Miseducation (2)
- Misrepresentation (2)
- Monroe v. Pape (2)
- Negligence (2)
- Parratt v. Taylor (2)
- Public policy (2)
- Section 1983 (2)
- Standard of care (2)
- The Parratt Doctrine (2)
- Tort law (2)
- Tort of educational malpractice (2)
- Torts (2)
- Zinermon case (2)
- Zinermon v. Burch (2)
- Agency by estoppel (1)
- Albain v. Flower Hospital (1)
- Alternative liability (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Educational Malpractice: A Tort En Ventre, Frank D. Aquila
Educational Malpractice: A Tort En Ventre, Frank D. Aquila
Cleveland State Law Review
This article explores the policy reasons which courts have adopted to deny a private cause of action holding educators legally liable for deficiencies in a student's education. The introductory section provides the background on the basic issue of malpractice in education. Section two examines educational malpractice case law focusing first on cases involving negligence in basic academic skill instruction, then looking at negligence in special education. Section three explores the various duty of care arguments while section four discusses three alternate theories for recovery. Section five analyzes the policy reasons for denial of the tort of educational malpractice. New directions …
Section 1983 And The Parratt Doctrine After Zinermon V. Burch: Ensuring Due Process Rights Or Turning The Fourteenth Amendment Into A Font Of Tort Law, Paul F. Wingenfeld
Section 1983 And The Parratt Doctrine After Zinermon V. Burch: Ensuring Due Process Rights Or Turning The Fourteenth Amendment Into A Font Of Tort Law, Paul F. Wingenfeld
Cleveland State Law Review
Over the last thirty years, the Court has decided a number of cases which illustrate an on-going struggle to find the proper place for section 1983 in the federal court system and, consequently, what ultimately qualifies as adequate procedural due process within the context of the statute. This note will examine the history of Court decisions involving section 1983 in order to provide the proper background for examining the Court's most recent decision in Zinermon v. Burch, a case which itself has added to an already confusing field of legal study. Within this historical background, however, the Court has actually …
Educational Malpractice: A Tort Is Born, Johnny C. Parker
Educational Malpractice: A Tort Is Born, Johnny C. Parker
Cleveland State Law Review
This article examines the judicial justification for the nonrecognition of educational malpractice as a theory of tort liability. Section I focuses on the various factual contexts in which educational malpractice claims have arisen and analyzes the concept of duty and proximate cause in the different factual contexts. Section II discusses the common law principles which demonstrate that the analytical problems associated with educational malpractice are not new to the law. Section III examines public policy as a distinct component of the duty-proximate cause inquiry. Section IV also focuses on public policy as expressed by various state legislatures regarding the teaching …
The Indeterminate Defendant In Products Liability Litigation And A Suggested Approach For Ohio, Rebecca J. Greenberg
The Indeterminate Defendant In Products Liability Litigation And A Suggested Approach For Ohio, Rebecca J. Greenberg
Cleveland State Law Review
The problems created by mass marketing, unequal bargaining power, and hidden product hazards have necessitated major changes in products liability law during the past thirty years. Correspondingly, considerations of cost reduction, injury avoidance, and fair risk distribution are generally advanced as the policies behind the widespread acceptance gained by strict liability in the 1960's. A decade later, these considerations were applied to the problem of proof of causation faced by plaintiffs who could not identify the specific defendant who caused their injuries. A limited version of this problem had been considered earlier in the seminal case of Summers v. Tice, …
Educational Malpractice: A Tort Is Born, Johnny C. Parker
Educational Malpractice: A Tort Is Born, Johnny C. Parker
Cleveland State Law Review
This article examines the judicial justification for the nonrecognition of educational malpractice as a theory of tort liability. Section I focuses on the various factual contexts in which educational malpractice claims have arisen and analyzes the concept of duty and proximate cause in the different factual contexts. Section II discusses the common law principles which demonstrate that the analytical problems associated with educational malpractice are not new to the law. Section III examines public policy as a distinct component of the duty-proximate cause inquiry. Section IV also focuses on public policy as expressed by various state legislatures regarding the teaching …
Educational Malpractice: A Tort En Ventre, Frank D. Aquila
Educational Malpractice: A Tort En Ventre, Frank D. Aquila
Cleveland State Law Review
This article explores the policy reasons which courts have adopted to deny a private cause of action holding educators legally liable for deficiencies in a student's education. The introductory section provides the background on the basic issue of malpractice in education. Section two examines educational malpractice case law focusing first on cases involving negligence in basic academic skill instruction, then looking at negligence in special education. Section three explores the various duty of care arguments while section four discusses three alternate theories for recovery. Section five analyzes the policy reasons for denial of the tort of educational malpractice. New directions …
Section 1983 And The Parratt Doctrine After Zinermon V. Burch: Ensuring Due Process Rights Or Turning The Fourteenth Amendment Into A Font Of Tort Law, Paul F. Wingenfeld
Section 1983 And The Parratt Doctrine After Zinermon V. Burch: Ensuring Due Process Rights Or Turning The Fourteenth Amendment Into A Font Of Tort Law, Paul F. Wingenfeld
Cleveland State Law Review
Over the last thirty years, the Court has decided a number of cases which illustrate an on-going struggle to find the proper place for section 1983 in the federal court system and, consequently, what ultimately qualifies as adequate procedural due process within the context of the statute. This note will examine the history of Court decisions involving section 1983 in order to provide the proper background for examining the Court's most recent decision in Zinermon v. Burch, a case which itself has added to an already confusing field of legal study. Within this historical background, however, the Court has actually …
At What Cost Will The Court Impose A Duty To Preserve The Life A Child, David S. Lockemeyer
At What Cost Will The Court Impose A Duty To Preserve The Life A Child, David S. Lockemeyer
Cleveland State Law Review
The purpose of this Note is to explore the issues surrounding parental consent for a surgical invasion of one child to save the life of a sibling. This Note focuses on the courts role in permitting organ transplantation. In addition, it will discuss the new developments in medical science regarding living donors and the concept of transplantation of regenerative organs and the possible impact on the court. Next, this Note analyzes the elements of duty to rescue, best interest and substituted judgment and the court's use of the various tests to justify invasion of a child's body. This Note examines …
From Hannola To Albain: The Rise And Fall Of Ohio's Hospital Agency By Estoppel Doctrine, David J. Wigham
From Hannola To Albain: The Rise And Fall Of Ohio's Hospital Agency By Estoppel Doctrine, David J. Wigham
Cleveland State Law Review
The role of the hospital in the field of medicine has evolved significantly in recent decades. Now hospitals privately distance themselves as far as possible from the acts of the negligent physician. Courts have intervened in recent years and expanded the scope of vicarious hospital liability. This Note will begin with a brief history of vicarious hospital liability. Next, it will examine the elements of two doctrines which are being used to impute such liability to hospitals - agency by estoppel and ostensible agency - and determine how each has been applied by courts across the nation to the hospital …