Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Arrington v. Commonwealth (1)
- Barber v. Commonwealth (1)
- Barrette v. Commonwealth (1)
- Bellfield v. Commonwealth (1)
-
- Bolden v. Commonwealth (1)
- Books Received (1)
- Bryant v. Commonwealth (1)
- Carter v. Commonwealth (1)
- Cheng v. Commonwealth (1)
- Cherricks v. Commonwealth (1)
- Commonwealth v. Rafferty (1)
- Conway v. Commonwealth (1)
- Curtis v. Commonwealth (1)
- Delacruz v. Commonwealth (1)
- Dixon v. Commonwealth (1)
- Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth (1)
- Foote v. Commonwealth (1)
- Foreword (1)
- Franklin v. Lynaugh (1)
- Frye v. Commonwealth (1)
- Gladden v. Commonwealth (1)
- Goodwin v. Commonwealth (1)
- Grady v. Corbin (1)
- Grover v. Commonwealth (1)
- Hardy v. Commonwealth (1)
- Hargrove v. Commonwealth (1)
- Harrell v. Commonwealth (1)
- Harris v. Commonwealth (1)
- History (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Limits Of Litigation - The Dalkon Shield Controversy, J. R. Zepkin
The Limits Of Litigation - The Dalkon Shield Controversy, J. R. Zepkin
University of Richmond Law Review
The Limits of Litigation-The Dalkon Shield Controversy is a tightly written, interesting book. It takes the reader from the beginning of the litigation concerning the contraceptive device to the bankruptcy settlement for the claimants. Professor Ronald J. Bacigal provides insight into the competing perspectives of the litigants as these cases crawled through the courts. The book reveals how the physical and emotional injuries that were suffered by so many women placed great pressure on the trial judges to force a resolution.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Steven D. Benjamin
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Criminal Law And Procedure, Steven D. Benjamin
University of Richmond Law Review
During the past year, the Virginia Court of Appeals continued in its role as the most significant contributor to criminal case law. The court ruled on a myriad of issues; the recurring topics involved arrest and investigatory detention, self-defense, the execution of search warrants, double jeopardy, the admissibility of eye-witness identification, and the circumstances and admissibility of a police interrogation. Also, the court ruled on numerous trial and procedural questions regularly encountered by the circuit courts and criminal practitioners.