Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- And Good Faith Purchasers (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Apac-Virginia Inc. v. Department of Highways & Transportation (1)
- Business Bank v. Plank (1)
- Buyers (1)
-
- CUNA Mutual Insurance Society v. Norman (1)
- Central Virginia Bank v. Bell (1)
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Fabrizio (1)
- Climatemakers Inc. v. Bryant Heating and Air Conditioning (1)
- Creditors (1)
- Crume v. Ford Motor Co. (1)
- Freedom of contract (1)
- Index (1)
- John Grier Construction Co. v. Jones Welding & Repair (1)
- Luddeke v. Amana Refrigeration (1)
- Money Remedies (1)
- Moore v. First Virginia Bank-Damascus (1)
- Noonan v. First Bank Butte (1)
- Notice of Breach (1)
- P.E.B. (1)
- Reclamation (1)
- Repudiation (1)
- Revocation of Acceptance (1)
- Sales contract (1)
- Sellers (1)
- Statutes of Limitations (1)
- Teel Construction v. Lipper (1)
- Title (1)
- UCC (1)
- Ukrop's Super Markets Inc. v. U.S. Mineral Products Co. (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Buyer's Remedies And Warranty Disclaimers: The Case For Mistake And The Indeterminacy Of U.C.C. Section 1-103, David Frisch
Buyer's Remedies And Warranty Disclaimers: The Case For Mistake And The Indeterminacy Of U.C.C. Section 1-103, David Frisch
Law Faculty Publications
The primary purpose of this article is not to end the longstanding malaise surrounding section 1-103, but to illuminate its existence and encourage a serious reconsideration of the extent to which common law and equitable principles serve as sources of law in resolving cases under the Code. A greater appreciation of the importance of this issue to commercial law development will result in an approach which makes the law more predictable and which better facilitates the essential need to keep the Code responsive to commercial practice. Part II of this article introduces the context within which section 1-103 will be …
U.C.C. Survey: General Provisions, Bulk Transfers, And Documents Of Title, David Frisch
U.C.C. Survey: General Provisions, Bulk Transfers, And Documents Of Title, David Frisch
Law Faculty Publications
This year several cases discussed the preemptive effect of the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act upon state law tort and contract claims arising from the sale of cigarettes to smokers who contracted cancer. This is aptly illustrated by Forster v. R. Reynolds Tobacco Co., which was decided by the Minnesota Supreme Court. In that case, the smoker (Forster) sued a cigarette manufacturer (R.J. Reynolds) in strict products liability, misrepresentation, breach of warranty, and negligence. The cigarette manufacturer moved for summary judgment on the ground that the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act preempted all state tort claims. The trial …
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Commercial Law, Michael J. Herbert
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Commercial Law, Michael J. Herbert
University of Richmond Law Review
This survey of commercial law discusses all Supreme Court of Virginia cases interpreting Virginia's version of the Uniform Commercial Code (the "Code" or the "U.C.C.") during the previous year, as well as statutory changes made to the Code in the most recent session of the General Assembly. It also reviews significant Code cases decided in the Virginia circuit courts and in the various federal courts sitting in Virginia. It is current as of about May 1, 1990.