Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Once Is Enough: A Proposed Bar Of The Injured Employee's Cause Of Action Against A Third Party, Philip D. Oliver
Once Is Enough: A Proposed Bar Of The Injured Employee's Cause Of Action Against A Third Party, Philip D. Oliver
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Rethinking Antitrust Injury, Roger D. Blair, Jeffrey L. Harrison
Rethinking Antitrust Injury, Roger D. Blair, Jeffrey L. Harrison
Vanderbilt Law Review
Substantive changes in antitrust law since 1977 have had a dramatic impact on the vitality of antitrust enforcement.' Recent "procedural" changes now seem likely to have as great an influence. In the procedural area, the emphasis has been on antitrust standing and anti-trust injury. As a result of recent judicial interpretations of these requirements, antitrust plaintiffs face increasingly formidable hurdles. As courts focus on questions of standing and injury, important discussions about whether a practice should be held to a per se or rule of reason standards frequently are immaterial. If there is no qualified plaintiff,the substantive issue need never …
Motor Vehicles And Traffic Serious Injury By Vehicle: Define Crime, J. Bagwell
Motor Vehicles And Traffic Serious Injury By Vehicle: Define Crime, J. Bagwell
Georgia State University Law Review
The Act creates a new felony offense of serious injury by vehicle resulting from reckless driving. Previously, the Code restricted the felony offense of serious injury by vehicle to reckless driving due to impairment of ability by alcohol or drugs. The Act broadens the statute's scope to include reckless driving without such impairment.
The International Law Of State Responsibility: Revolution Or Evolution?, Pierre-Marie Dupuy
The International Law Of State Responsibility: Revolution Or Evolution?, Pierre-Marie Dupuy
Michigan Journal of International Law
After briefly summarizing the classical doctrine of state responsibility, Part One will discuss whether extending compensation to the harmful consequences of certain hazardous activities necessarily involves the recognition of a "liability for lawful conduct" without any link to traditional ideas of state responsibility. Part Two, starting again from responsibility for wrongful acts, will discuss whether raising a new category, the breach of an "essential obligation" or "international crimes," confers not only an obligation to make reparations, but a right, in both the victim state and the non-victim states, to sanction the responsible state.