Law Commons^™

Doctors And Lawyers And Wolves, George J. Annas

Faculty Scholarship

Relations between lawyers and physicians, and therefore between law and medicine, are getting more and more destructive and counterproductive. It used to be a joke, but it's not funny anymore. We can't afford the continuing and escalating acrimony between our professions and it's time that we take constructive steps in the public interest to deal with it.

The Right To Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: Legal Trends And Emerging Issues, Karen H. Rothenberg

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Biotechnology Revolution And Its Regulatory Evolution, Diane E. Hoffmann

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Predicting The Future Of Privacy In Pregnancy: How Medical Technology Affects The Legal Rights Of Pregnant Women, George J. Annas

Faculty Scholarship

The bodies of pregnant women are the battleground on which the campaign to define the right of privacy is fought. The ultimate outcome will likely be shaped at least as much by new medical technologies as by politics or moral persuasion. This is because medical technologies do much more than change what we can do: they can radically alter the way we think about ourselves. Technologies have the power to change "not only the relation of man to nature but of man to man."1 More than that, they can alter our very concept of what it means to be human, …

Equitable Access To Biomedical Advances: Getting Beyond The Rights Impasse, Wendy K. Mariner

Faculty Scholarship

In 1988, gay rights activists and supporters demonstrated outside a Food and Drug Administration building demanding unrestricted access to experimental drugs being tested for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus ("HIV") infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome ("AIDS").² Across the ocean in France, in October of the same year, came an equally insistent demand from women's groups, scientists, and family planning agencies that the pharmaceutical company Groupe Roussel Uclaf put its abortifacient RU 486 back on the market.' Early in 1989, people were outraged when newspapers reported that New Hampshire's Medicaid program would not pay for a life-saving bone marrow …

Aids And Government: A Plan Of Action, Taunya L. Banks

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Feeding The Permanently Unconscious And Terminally Ill Or Dying Is Not Always Compassion, Phebe Saunders Haugen

Faculty Scholarship

A surrogate decision maker may conclude that efforts to mechanically provide liquid nourishment would cause considerable suffering in return for little gain. But such a decision is unquestionably one that can produce great conflict for families and for medical caregivers. Assessment must be made of each patient's situation and of the benefits and burdens that will result if tube feeding is withheld or withdrawn. It may well be, however, that in some cases, the most humane and compassionate treatment for a patient is the withdrawal of all technological interventions, including those that supply nourishment.

The Supreme Court, Privacy, And Abortion, George J. Annas

Faculty Scholarship

Although states can regulate abortions after the point of fetal viability (or, more accurately, can restrict the induction of premature birth), since Roe only 13 states have enacted laws to restrict such abortions.8 Decisions after Roe In more than a dozen major cases over the succeeding 15 years, the Supreme Court applied Roe to specific attempts by some states to limit abortion rights during the first and second trimesters. [...]1989, the Court consistently struck down almost all such limitations. The Court did find it constitutional, however, for the state and federal governments to refuse to fund abortions through the Medicaid …

The Politics Of Transplantation Of Human Fetal Tissue, George J. Annas

Faculty Scholarship

Research involving human fetal tissue has been the subject of intense political debate in this country for almost two decades, and the use of fetal tissues in transplantation continues this controversy in another forum. Since Roe v. Wade ,1 the landmark decision on abortion by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973, the federal government has focused public attention on fetal research by creating panels of experts. "3 This conclusion was accepted on a vote of 15 to 2, and included recommendations that the decision to abort be kept independent of the decision to retrieve and use fetal tissue, that recipients …

Evaluating Child Care Legislation: Program Structures And Political Consequences, Lance Liebman

Faculty Scholarship

The American political system is not good at choosing among worthy goals and then adopting programs well designed to achieve the desired purposes. Scholars and activists continue to debate the success and failure of the last quarter century of efforts to reduce inequality and achieve other social reforms. But we have no well developed methodology for evaluating proposed programs and attempting to predict their likely consequences.

This Article asks what we know about choosing legal structures for programmatic efforts that seek social change. In particular, it asks whether we can predict relationships between different ways of pursuing public ends and …

Who Cares?: The Evolution Of The Legal Duty To Provide Emergency Care, Karen H. Rothenberg

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Amici For Appellees: Brief For Bioethicists For Privacy As Amicus Curiae Supporting Appelles Brief For Bioethicists For Privacy As Amicus Curiae Supporting Appellees, George J. Annas, Leonard H. Glantz, Wendy K. Mariner

Faculty Scholarship

Amicus is an ad hoc group of 57 philosophers, theologians, attorneys and physicians .. .who teach medical ethics to medical students and physicians. The members believe that permitting competent adults to make important, personal medical decisions in consultation with their physician is a fundamental principle of medical ethics, and that the doctor-patient relationship deserves the constitutional protection the Court has afforded it under the right of privacy.

There Is No Archbishop Of Science - A Comment On Elliot's Toward Incentive-Based Procedure: Three Approaches For Regulating Scientific Evidence, Robert L. Schwartz

Faculty Scholarship

As is usual when Professor Elliott writes about turning retrospective judge-oriented procedural rules into prospective attorney-oriented procedural incentives, his proposal for dealing with scientific testimony not accepted within the scientific community is both interesting and provocative. It also serves as an apology for those judges who are so in awe of science that they believe that only they or their peers in the scientific establishment-and not the common folk selected for jury service-are likely to understand the complex truths that science yields. Professor Elliott starts with the assumption that there is a need for some kind of judicial intervention to …

Setting Limits On Autonomy: Saving Money In An Aging Society, Robert L. Schwartz

Faculty Scholarship

In Setting Limits Dr. Daniel Callahan poses a solution: the termination of some kinds of treatment for the very elderly. His solution undercuts autonomy of the individual. This Article describes the values served by autonomy and explains why autonomy is so basic to making health care decisions and why its importance is especially great in the United States. Of course, autonomy is not absolute. This Article will define those classes of cases in which autonomy can be trumped by other interests. The Article will next determine whether the class of cases defined by Dr. Callahan fits within that definition. Finally, …