Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Families (2)
- Best interests advocate (1)
- Bioethics (1)
- Child Protection Law MCLA 722.630 (1)
- Child advocate (1)
-
- Child protection proceedings (1)
- Children (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Discourse (1)
- Euthanasia (1)
- Farms (1)
- Households (1)
- Iceland (1)
- Juvenile Court Rules MCR 5.915 (B)(2) (1)
- Juvenile court (1)
- Kin (1)
- Marriage (1)
- Medical care (1)
- Medieval times (1)
- Michigan Department of Social Services (1)
- Neonatal euthanasia (1)
- Newborns (1)
- Parents (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Property (1)
- Relatives (1)
- Residences (1)
- Sources (1)
- State interests (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Representing Children, Donald N. Duquette
Representing Children, Donald N. Duquette
Articles
The Child Protection Law, MCLA 722.630, and the Juvenile Court Rules, MCR 5.915 (B)(2), require the Juvenile Court to appoint an attorney for the child in child protection proceedings. Although the child protection law identifies some of the expectations of the child's counsel,t many questions remain. What does it mean to be a good child advocate in these cases? How does one identify the best interests of the children? What is the place of the child's wishes in identifying the goals of the advocate? Beyond the letter of the law, what ought to be the proper role of the child's …
Washington's New Quasi-Community Property Act: Protecting The Immigrant Spouse, Thomas R. Andrews
Washington's New Quasi-Community Property Act: Protecting The Immigrant Spouse, Thomas R. Andrews
Articles
In 1986, Washington followed the lead of several other community property jurisdictions by adopting quasi-community property legislation. The act is designed to prevent a spouse who has onerously acquired property during marriage while the couple resided in a common law state from disinheriting his or her surviving spouse as to that property after moving to Washington. It has significant implications not only for married couples contemplating a move to Washington, but also for those who have moved to Washington from common law jurisdictions in the past. This article explains why the risk of disinheritance arises, describes the provisions of Washington's …
State-Interest Analysis In Fourteenth-Amendment "Privacy" Law: An Essay On The Constitutionalization Of Social Issues, Carl E. Schneider
State-Interest Analysis In Fourteenth-Amendment "Privacy" Law: An Essay On The Constitutionalization Of Social Issues, Carl E. Schneider
Articles
Asked to resolve a social issue, Americans today turn readily to rights and to the Constitution that is understood to embody them. Many "vice" issues have long been thought particularly apt for a rights analysis. A constitutional resolution of vice issues is therefore inevitably a possibility, and its wisdom is inevitably a question. In this essay, I want to address that question by investigating an area of the law that has been recently constitutionalized family law. Family law is an example worth studying because rights thinking has won a considerable prominence in it: The Constitution has been used to transform …
Rights Discourse And Neonatal Euthanasia, Carl E. Schneider
Rights Discourse And Neonatal Euthanasia, Carl E. Schneider
Articles
Hard cases, they say, make bad law. Hard cases, we know, can also make revealing law. Hard cases identify the problems we have not found a way of solving. They reveal ways the law's goals conflict. They force us to articulate our assumptions and to examine our modes of discourse and reasoning. If there was ever a hard case for the law, it is the question of whether, how, and by whom it should be decided to allow newborn children who are severely retarded mentally or severely damaged physically to die. For many years, the law has not had to …
Some Aspects Of Householding In The Medieval Icelandic Commonwealth, William I. Miller
Some Aspects Of Householding In The Medieval Icelandic Commonwealth, William I. Miller
Articles
There has been much, mostly inconclusive, discussion about how to define the household in a manner suitable for comparative purposes. Certain conventional criteria are not very useful in the Icelandic context, where it appears that a person could be attached to more than one household, where the laws suggest it was possible for more than one household to be resident in the same uncompartmentalised farmhouse; and where headship might often be shared. Definitions, for example, based on co residence or on commensalism do not jibe all that well with the pastoral transhumance practised by the Icelanders. Sheep were tended and …