Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Administrative Law (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- American Art and Architecture (1)
-
- Animal Law (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Biodiversity (1)
- Business (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Courts (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Earth Sciences (1)
- Economic Policy (1)
- Economics (1)
- English Language and Literature (1)
- Environmental Health and Protection (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Environmental Policy (1)
- Environmental Sciences (1)
- History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology (1)
- Hydrology (1)
- International Business (1)
- International Economics (1)
- International Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Land Use Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Institution
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Agenda: External Development Affecting The National Parks: Preserving "The Best Idea We Ever Had", University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: External Development Affecting The National Parks: Preserving "The Best Idea We Ever Had", University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
External Development Affecting the National Parks: Preserving "The Best Idea We Ever Had" (September 14-16)
Conference organizers and/or faculty included University of Colorado School of Law professors Lawrence J. MacDonnell and Daniel Magraw.
The conference will be held at the Aspen Lodge, adjacent to Rocky Mountain National Park near Estes Park, Colorado.
It was Wallace Stegner who called the national parks "the best idea we ever had." The continuing increases in usage attest to their popularity. National parks are created to preserve areas of special scenic and cultural value for enjoyment and use. Managing the parks in a manner that protects the important values and purposes for which they were created presents important and difficult …
Duties To Offset Competitive Advantages, Richard B. Dagen, Michael S. Knoll
Duties To Offset Competitive Advantages, Richard B. Dagen, Michael S. Knoll
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Congressional Standing To Sue: Whose Vote Is This, Anyway?, R. Lawrence Dessem
Congressional Standing To Sue: Whose Vote Is This, Anyway?, R. Lawrence Dessem
Faculty Publications
The article is divided into three major sections. Section I traces the development of a separate doctrine of “congressional standing.” It examines the doctrine's development from the Supreme Court's initial consideration of legislative standing through the current opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Section II then analyzes three possible theories of congressional injury and standing. Derivative, representative, and third-party standing theories are all rejected as a basis for congressional standing. While rejecting the suggestion that congressmen possess a personal interest in “their” votes sufficient to constitute the “distinct and palpable injury” required …