Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AFDC (1)
- Adderly v. Florida (1)
- Atkins v. Parker (1)
- Board of Regents v. Roth (1)
- Code of Federal Regulations (1)
-
- Edwards v. South Carolina (1)
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation (1)
- GAAA (1)
- General Administrative Agencies Act (1)
- Goldberg v. Kelly (1)
- Greer v. Spock (1)
- Harris v. Lukhard (1)
- Mathews v. Eldridge (1)
- New York Times Co v. United States (1)
- Southeastern Promotions v. Conrad (1)
- Spence v. Washington (1)
- VAPA (1)
- VEPCO v. Board of County Supervisors (1)
- Virginia Administrative Process Act (1)
- Widmar v. Vincent (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Virginia Should Open Its Courthouse Doors To Review Administrative Decisions Involving Public Assistance, Christopher Allen Stump, Jill A. Hanken
Virginia Should Open Its Courthouse Doors To Review Administrative Decisions Involving Public Assistance, Christopher Allen Stump, Jill A. Hanken
University of Richmond Law Review
Virginia's courts interpret the Virginia Administrative Process Act (VAPA) to prohibit judicial review of administrative decisions that grant or deny public assistance funds. Virginia is therefore one of only three states which fail to provide judicial review of such decisions. This article advocates judicial review of public assistance hearing decisions on the basis of principles of statutory construction and constitutional law. The article concludes that Virginia's minority status indicates a failure to meet traditional notions of fairness.
Pigeonholes In The Public Forum, Gary C. Leedes
Pigeonholes In The Public Forum, Gary C. Leedes
University of Richmond Law Review
Streets, parks, and similar places traditionally used for purposes of discussion and assembly are public forums where people have liberty to communicate their thoughts. Persons lacking the status, money or charisma necessary to command coverage by the mass media often desperately seek access to the public forum. Once access is obtained, ideas can be communicated in a cost-effective manner. However, like other first amendment cases, public forum cases are not fungible. The varying weights of competing interests and the instability of ad hoc balancing tests have created a need for doctrinal structure. The Supreme Court's evolving public forum doctrine is …