Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Intentional discrimination (2)
- Selection criterion (2)
- Title VII (2)
- 1947 Taft-Hartley Amendments (1)
- 1965 Restatement (Second) of Torts (1)
-
- 1st Amendment (1)
- Alternative employee section criteria (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Connick v. Myers (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Disparate treatment (1)
- Employees (1)
- Employment at Will (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Government Employees (1)
- Industrial relations (1)
- Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (1)
- Labor laws & legislation (1)
- Liability for emotional distress (1)
- NLRB under the Wagner Act (1)
- Private Sector Employees (1)
- Public officers (1)
- Recent Decisions of the NLRB (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- The Reagan Influence (1)
- United States National Labor Relations Board (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress In The Employment At Will Setting: Limiting The Employer's Manner Of Discharge, James F. Bleeke
Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress In The Employment At Will Setting: Limiting The Employer's Manner Of Discharge, James F. Bleeke
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Connick V. Myers: New Restrictions On The Free Speech Rights Of Government Employees, Peter C. Mccabe Iii
Connick V. Myers: New Restrictions On The Free Speech Rights Of Government Employees, Peter C. Mccabe Iii
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Recent Decisions Of The Nlrb-The Reagan Influence, Terry A. Bethel
Recent Decisions Of The Nlrb-The Reagan Influence, Terry A. Bethel
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Alternatives To Challenged Employee Selection Criteria: The Significance Of Nonstatistical Evidence In Disparate Impact Cases Under Title Vii, Julia C. Lamber
Alternatives To Challenged Employee Selection Criteria: The Significance Of Nonstatistical Evidence In Disparate Impact Cases Under Title Vii, Julia C. Lamber
Articles by Maurer Faculty
In contrast to most recent commentary and a superficial reading of Supreme Court cases, Professor Lamber rehabilitates the concept of a distinct disparate impact theory under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. She examines one important evidentiary question-the significance of alternative employee section criteria-to expose underlying policy questions often buried in technical questions of form. Others have argued that the Supreme Court's apparent analytical and evidentiary alignment of disparate impact and disparate treatment cases shows that Title VII bars only "intentional discrimination" and thus the purpose of alternatives evidence is quite limited. Professor Lamber presents a different view, …
Discretionary Decisionmaking: The Application Of Title Vii's Disparate Impact Theory, Julia C. Lamber
Discretionary Decisionmaking: The Application Of Title Vii's Disparate Impact Theory, Julia C. Lamber
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.