Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

A Critique Of Abortion Rights, Richard Stith Oct 1983

A Critique Of Abortion Rights, Richard Stith

Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Parental Notification And Abortion: A Review And Recommendation To West Virginia's Legislature, David W. Frame West Virginia University College Of Law Jun 1983

Parental Notification And Abortion: A Review And Recommendation To West Virginia's Legislature, David W. Frame West Virginia University College Of Law

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Lawyers And The Abortion Debate: Presenting A Balanced View, Thomas B. Mcaffee Jan 1983

Lawyers And The Abortion Debate: Presenting A Balanced View, Thomas B. Mcaffee

Scholarly Works

The author is pleased to see the publication of A Lawyer Looks at Abortion because legal scholars have much to contribute to the understanding of public questions. Lay readers too often receive distorted impressions of legal issues from the media, and those who understand the system best are frequently too busy writing for the legal community to contribute to popular literature. Yet it is legal scholars who are best equipped to make the intricacies of law accessible to lay persons by defining and explaining legal terms and doctrine and by examining the reasoning found in relevant judicial decisions. Lawyers are …


Kentucky's New Abortion Law: Searching For The Outer Limits Of Permissible Regulation, Keith Moorman Jan 1983

Kentucky's New Abortion Law: Searching For The Outer Limits Of Permissible Regulation, Keith Moorman

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


The Concept Of Person In The Law, Charles Baron Dec 1982

The Concept Of Person In The Law, Charles Baron

Charles H. Baron

The focus of the abortion debate in the United States tends to be on whether and at what stage a fetus is a person. I believe this tendency has been unfortunate and counterproductive. Instead of advancing dialogue between opposing sides, such a focus seems to have stunted it, leaving advocates in the sort of “I did not!” – “You did too!” impasse we remember from childhood. Also reminiscent of that childhood scene has been the vain attempt to break the impasse by appeal to a higher authority. Thus, the pro-choice forces hoped they had proved the pro-life forces “wrong” by …