Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident Commission (1)
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hague (1)
- American Automobile Insurance Co. v. Fulcher (1)
- Bradford Electric Co. v. Clapper (1)
- Busik v. Levine (1)
-
- Carroll v. Lanza (1)
- Clay v. Sun Insurance Office (1)
- Denham v. Bedford (1)
- Guin v. Ha (1)
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Delta & Pine Land Co (1)
- Home Insurance Co. v. Dick (1)
- Michigan Milk Producers Association v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. (1)
- Pa- cific Employers Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission (1)
- Revised Judicature Act (1)
- United Services Automobile Association v. Russom (1)
- Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. (1)
- Wilkerson v. Maryland Casualty Co. (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Impact Of Allstate Insurance Co. V. Hague On Constitutional Limitations On Choice Of Law, W. Clark Williams Jr.
The Impact Of Allstate Insurance Co. V. Hague On Constitutional Limitations On Choice Of Law, W. Clark Williams Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
The development of constitutional limitations on choice of law by the United States Supreme Court has turned primarily on the due process clause and the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution. In theory at least, each constitutional provision rests upon separate grounds. The full faith and credit clause, as it applies to public acts, would compel a forum state under appropriate circumstances to honor the sovereignty of a foreign state in the federal system and to apply the law of the foreign state whose interests are sufficiently compelling. The due process clause limits the power of …
Insurer's Liability For Prejudgment Interest: A Modern Approach, David J. Pierce
Insurer's Liability For Prejudgment Interest: A Modern Approach, David J. Pierce
University of Richmond Law Review
The term "prejudgment interest" denotes the interest on a judgment computed from the time of the actual injury to the date of the final judgment. It is interest on a sum of money which, until the rendering of final judgment, has not been declared to be damages for the plaintiff. Prejudgment interest is not punitive. It is better viewed as compensatory in nature because its purpose is to indemnify a claimant for the loss. of the money which presumably could have been earned had payment of damages not been delayed. Once a cause of action accrues, the injured party becomes …