Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Interlocutory Appeal Of Orders Granting Or Denying Stays Of Arbitration, Michigan Law Review Nov 1981

Interlocutory Appeal Of Orders Granting Or Denying Stays Of Arbitration, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note attempts to resolve the conflict among the courts of appeals by examining the interests affected by orders granting and denying stays of arbitration. Part I considers the appealability of such orders under the collateral order doctrine developed by the Supreme Court in Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. This doctrine permits interlocutory appeal of final orders adjudicating an important right that is collateral to the merits of the case and effectively unreviewable in a final judgment appeal. Part II considers whether orders on motions for stays of arbitration are reviewable as orders granting or refusing injunctions under …


Where Two Worlds Meet: A Time For Reassessment In The Anthropology Of Law, Simon Roberts Mar 1981

Where Two Worlds Meet: A Time For Reassessment In The Anthropology Of Law, Simon Roberts

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective by P.H. Gulliver, and The Disputing Process--Law In ten Societies edited by Laura Nader and Harry F. Todd Jr., and The Imposition of Law edited by Sandra B. Burman and Barbara E. Harrell-Bond


Organizing The Ethnography Of Negotiations, William L.F. Felstiner Mar 1981

Organizing The Ethnography Of Negotiations, William L.F. Felstiner

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective by P.H. Gulliver


Protection Against Unjust Discipline: An Idea Whose Time Has Long Since Come, Theodore J. St. Antoine Jan 1981

Protection Against Unjust Discipline: An Idea Whose Time Has Long Since Come, Theodore J. St. Antoine

Book Chapters

The law seems able to absorb only so many new ideas in a given area at any one time. In 1967 Professor Lawrence Blades of Kansas produced a pioneering article in which he decried the iron grip of the contract doctrine of employment at will, and argued that all employees should be legally protected against abusive discharge. The next dozen years witnessed a remarkable reaction. With a unanimity rare, if not unprecedented, among the contentious tribe of labor academics and labor arbitrators, a veritable Who's Who of those professions stepped forth to embrace Blades' notion, and to refine and elaborate …