Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1980

Washington Law Review

Torts

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Defamation And The First Amendment: Protecting Speech On Public Issues, Bruce J. Borrus Dec 1980

Defamation And The First Amendment: Protecting Speech On Public Issues, Bruce J. Borrus

Washington Law Review

The common law of defamation collided with the United States Constitution in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, and aftershocks from that collision have been rumbling for sixteen years. Ever since the New York Times Court asserted that the first and fourteenth amendments impose restraints on a state's power to afford a civil remedy for wrongful injury to reputation, the Supreme Court has been torn between its concern for personal reputation and its competing concern for free expression. The difficulty of resolving the conflict between these two concerns has forced the Court to decide a long line of cases …


Defamation And The First Amendment: Protecting Speech On Public Issues, Bruce J. Borrus Dec 1980

Defamation And The First Amendment: Protecting Speech On Public Issues, Bruce J. Borrus

Washington Law Review

The common law of defamation collided with the United States Constitution in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, and aftershocks from that collision have been rumbling for sixteen years. Ever since the New York Times Court asserted that the first and fourteenth amendments impose restraints on a state's power to afford a civil remedy for wrongful injury to reputation, the Supreme Court has been torn between its concern for personal reputation and its competing concern for free expression. The difficulty of resolving the conflict between these two concerns has forced the Court to decide a long line of cases in …


Informed Consent In Washington: Expanded Scope Of Material Facts That The Physician Must Disclose To His Patient, Edwin Rauzi Jun 1980

Informed Consent In Washington: Expanded Scope Of Material Facts That The Physician Must Disclose To His Patient, Edwin Rauzi

Washington Law Review

Part I of this comment charts the current contours of the informed consent doctrine and traces the general pro-plaintiff shift which has developed since Washington recognized the tort a decade ago. The model used to illustrate this shift is a continuum, with the poles representing doctrinal and social policy choices favorable either to the plaintiff-patient or to the defendant-physician. Part II examines the expanded scope of the physician's duty to disclose material facts. This comment posits that the material facts which the physician must disclose to his patient are the risks involved in a proposed treatment, the alternatives to the …


Torts—Wrongful Birth—New Jersey Recognizes Emotional Distress Damages In A Wrongful Birth Action Involving A Deformed Child—Berman V. Allan, 80 N.J. 421, 404 A.2d (1979), T. Ryan Durkan Jun 1980

Torts—Wrongful Birth—New Jersey Recognizes Emotional Distress Damages In A Wrongful Birth Action Involving A Deformed Child—Berman V. Allan, 80 N.J. 421, 404 A.2d (1979), T. Ryan Durkan

Washington Law Review

This note begins by reviewing developments that created the legal and social setting for the Berman decision. After analyzing the court's opinion the focus shifts to the issue of damages. A valuation scheme is then proposed to effectuate the conclusion that both pecuniary and emotional damages should be awarded in wrongful birth actions involving impaired children.