Law Commons^™

Tender Offer Developments--Introduction, Case Western Reserve University Law Review

Case Western Reserve Law Review

No abstract provided.

Implied Private Actions For Federal Margin Violations: The Cort V. Ash Factors, William M. Hartnett

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Securities Law - Rule 10b-5 - Oral Executory Contract To Purchase Securities Held To Provide Sufficient Basis For Standing To Bring Private 10b-5 Action, And Fraud Occuring During The Pendency Fo The Executory Contract Held To Be In Connection With The Purchase Of Securities, Lisa S. Hunter

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.

When Is A Note Security, J. Casey Mcglynn

Santa Clara Law Review

No abstract provided.

An Overview Of Promissory Notes Under The Federal Securities Laws, Frederick Green

Fordham Urban Law Journal

Article discusses the intent of the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and their various judicial interpretations. Article notes the judicial trend away from a literal reading where all securities would be covered by the acts but how the Second Circuit has been reluctant to stray from a literal interpretation of the acts despite a rejection from the United States Supreme Court.

Voluntary Recapitalization, Fairness, And Rule 10b-5: Life Along The Trail Of Santa Fe, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

In corporate recapitalizations, the board of directors will sometimes propose a recapitalization plan which substantially alters the “bundle of rights” represented by preferred shares. Although these plans cannot usually be completed without the approval of a majority of the preferred shareholders, the preferred shareholders are at a disadvantage to protect their interests for several reasons. Thus preferred shareholders who are dissatisfied with the change in their rights will sometimes call upon state courts to enjoin the recapitalization on the grounds that it is unfair or fraudulent; state courts, however, have provided only slight protection for preferred shareholders. In this article, …

Santa Fe Industries, Inc. V. Green: An Analysis Two Years Later, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

In 1977, the Supreme Court decided Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green. Although the outcome of that decision should have surprised no one, since the trend of the Court clearly had been to constrict the scope of the federal securities legislation, the case was a major decision that will have a substantial impact on the development of corporate law in this country. Indeed, it may turn out to be one of the most significant corporate cases decided by the Supreme Court in recent years. Since by this point the dust has settled from the case, it seems appropriate to …

The Plight Of Small Issuers Under The Securities Act Of 1933: Practical Foreclosure From The Capital Market, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The thesis of this Article is simple: the Securities Act of 1933 does not work very well for small issuers, a premise which the Securities and Exchange Commission appeared to tacitly recognize in a series of announcements released early this year. Because of a combination of exorbitant costs, unmanageable levels of ambiguity, unworkable resale provisions and contamination caused by prior illegal sales of stock, a small issuer often is unable to comply with the 1933 Act. As a result it may be difficult or even impossible for a small issuer to raise capital by selling stock.

There are obvious pernicious …

Security Interests In Motor Vehicles: A Conflict In Kentucky Law, Henry Lawson

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.